Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

24-hour esophageal pH-metry is not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system (Restech) may detect LPR better. There is no established correlation between these two techniques as only small case series exist. The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between the two techniques with a large patient cohort. All patients received a complete diagnostic workup for gastroesophageal reflux including symptom evaluation, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry, high resolution manometry, and Restech. Consecutive patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux and disease-related extra-esophageal symptoms were evaluated using 24-hour laryngopharyngeal and concomitant esophageal pH-monitoring. Subsequently, the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated subdividing the different reflux scenarios into four groups. A total of 101 patients from December 2013 to February 2017 were included. All patients presented extra-esophageal symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, asthma symptoms, and globus sensation. Classical reflux symptoms such as heartburn (71%), regurgitation (60%), retrosternal pain (54%), and dysphagia (32%) were also present. Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was positive in 66 patients (65%) with a mean DeMeester Score of 66.7 [15-292]. Four different reflux scenarios were detected (group A-D): in 39% of patients with abnormal esophageal pH-metry, Restech evaluation was normal (group A, n = 26, mean DeMeester-score = 57.9 [15-255], mean Ryan score = 2.6 [2-8]). In 23% of patients with normal pH-metry (n = 8, group B), Restech evaluation was abnormal (mean DeMeester-score 10.5 [5-13], mean Ryan score 63.5 [27-84]). The remaining groups C and D showed corresponding results. Restech evaluation was positive in 48% of cases in this highly selective patient cohort. As demonstrated by four reflux scenarios, esophageal pH-metry and Restech do not necessarily need to correspond. Especially in patients with borderline abnormal 24-hour pH-metry, Restech may help to support the decision for or against laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

Distinct gene expression profiles of proximal and distal colorectal cancer: implications for cytotoxic and targeted therapy.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with genetic profiles and clinical outcomes dependent on the anatomic location of the primary tumor. How location has an impact on the molecular makeup of a tumor and how prognostic and predictive biomarkers differ between proximal versus distal colon cancers is not well established. We investigated the associations between tumor location, KRAS and BRAF mutation status, and the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of proteins involved in major signaling pathways, including tumor growth (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)), DNA repair (excision repair cross complement group 1 (ERCC1)) and fluoropyrimidine metabolism (thymidylate synthase (TS)). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 431 advanced CRC patients were analyzed. The presence of seven different KRAS base substitutions and the BRAF V600E mutation was determined. ERCC1, TS, EGFR and VEGFR2 mRNA expression levels were detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR. BRAF mutations were significantly more common in the proximal colon (P<0.001), whereas KRAS mutations occurred at similar frequencies throughout the colorectum. Rectal cancers had significantly higher ERCC1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels compared with distal and proximal colon tumors (P=0.001), and increased TS levels compared with distal colon cancers (P=0.02). Mutant KRAS status was associated with lower ERCC1, TS, EGFR and VEGFR2 gene expression in multivariate analysis. In a subgroup analysis, this association remained significant for all genes in the proximal colon and for VEGFR2 expression in rectal cancers. The mRNA expression patterns of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, as well as associations with KRAS and BRAF mutation status depend on primary tumor location. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and determine the underlying mechanisms.

KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: implications for EGFR-targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are associated with diverse biologic functions as well as prognostic and predictive impact in non-small cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). In CRC, benefit from monoclonal antibody therapies targeting EGFR is generally limited to patients whose tumors have wild-type (WT) KRAS, whereas data suggest that this association is not present for NSCLC. We hypothesized that the unique tobacco-related carcinogenesis of NSCLC results in a divergence of KRAS MT genotype compared with CRC, contributing to differences in outcomes from EGFR-targeted therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tumor from 2603 patients (838 CRC and 1765 NSCLC) was analyzed for KRAS mutations. DNA was extracted from microdissected formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) and 7 different base substitutions in codons 12 and 13 of KRAS were determined. RESULTS: KRAS mutation genotype differed significantly between NSCLC and CRC in frequency (25% vs. 39%; p<0.001), smoking-associated G>T transversions (73% versus 27%; p<0.001), and ratio of transversions to transitions (3.5 vs. 0.79; p<0.001). In NSCLC GLY12Cys mutations, resulting from a codon 12 GGT>TGT substitution, were observed in 44% compared to 10% for CRC. In contrast, codon 12 or 13 GLY>ASP substitutions (resulting in a G>A transition) were more frequent in CRC (42%) compared with NSCLC (21%). CONCLUSION: In this large dataset, KRAS mutation patterns are quantitatively and qualitatively distinct between NSCLC and CRC, reflecting in part differences in tobacco-related carcinogenesis. In light of differences in predictive value for EGFR-directed monoclonal antibody therapy and prognosis for specific KRAS mutations between NSCLC and CRC, these data provide an underlying biologic rationale.