RESUMEN
Pneumonia causes the highest mortality of all infectious diseases worldwide. The most common pathogens are bacteria but there are also epidemic or pandemic lung infections caused by influenza or coronaviruses, such as the current pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In addition to the occurrence of antibiotic resistance and immune pathologies, such as in sepsis, important challenges lie in considering the susceptibility of individual patients. Here, age, medication and comorbidities are considered; however, there is also clear evidence of genetic influences on the individual risk of developing pneumonia or developing a severe course of the disease. This article discusses the genetic influences on pneumonia and the clinical significance.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In COPD, the course of the disease including morbidity and mortality is strongly associated with severe exacerbations. The current GOLD recommendations emphasize blood eosinophil counts as a marker for responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Retrospective analyses from randomized clinical trials indicate a favorable response to systemic corticosteroids in exacerbated COPD patients with blood eosinophils > 2%, however data outside clinical trials are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 1007 cases of patients who were admitted to the University Medical Center Marburg between 01/2013 and 12/2018. All patients had been diagnosed with an acute exacerbation of COPD (ICD-10 J44.0/J44.1). Our analysis was based on a subgroup of 417 patients in whom a full blood cell count was obtained at the day of admission. Patients were predominantly male (63.3%), had a median age of 74 years (IQR 65 years - 83 years) and a median FEV1 of 1.03 l (42.6% predicted). We compared the hospital length of stay and other outcome parameters using established thresholds for the eosinophil blood cell count (100 and 300 eosinophils/µl and 2%). RESULTS: Patients with low eosinophils (< 2%, <100 cells/µl) had a longer median time in hospital (length of hospital stay - LOS) as compared to patients with high eosinophils (< 2%: 9.31 vs. ≥2%:7 days, and < 100/µl: 10 vs. 100-300/µl: 8 vs. > 300/µl: 7 days). The median CRP was higher in patients with low eosinophils as compared to the other groups (< 2%: 22.7 vs. ≥2%: 9 mg/dl and < 100: 25 vs. 100-300: 13.5 vs. > 300: 7.1 mg/dl). Time to re-hospitalization or time to death did not differ between strata of eosinophils. Sensitivity analysis in a subgroup of patients in which pneumonia was excluded by chest x-ray did not significantly alter the results. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that patients with severe COPD exacerbations and elevated blood eosinophil counts respond better to systemic corticosteroid treatment than patients with a non-eosinophilic exacerbation.
Asunto(s)
Eosinófilos/metabolismo , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/sangre , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado/fisiología , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Chronic airflow limitation is the common denominator of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it is not possible to predict morbidity and mortality of individual patients based on the degree of lung function impairment, nor does the degree of airflow limitation allow guidance regarding therapies. Over the last decades, understanding of the factors contributing to the heterogeneity of disease trajectories, clinical presentation, and response to existing therapies has greatly advanced. Indeed, diagnostic assessment and treatment algorithms for COPD have become more personalized. In addition to the pulmonary abnormalities and inhaler therapies, extra-pulmonary features and comorbidities have been studied and are considered essential components of comprehensive disease management, including lifestyle interventions. Despite these advances, predicting and/or modifying the course of the disease remains currently impossible, and selection of patients with a beneficial response to specific interventions is unsatisfactory. Consequently, non-response to pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments is common, and many patients have refractory symptoms. Thus, there is an ongoing urgency for a more targeted and holistic management of the disease, incorporating the basic principles of P4 medicine (predictive, preventive, personalized, and participatory). This review describes the current status and unmet needs regarding personalized medicine for patients with COPD. Also, it proposes a systems medicine approach, integrating genetic, environmental, (micro)biological, and clinical factors in experimental and computational models in order to decipher the multilevel complexity of COPD. Ultimately, the acquired insights will enable the development of clinical decision support systems and advance personalized medicine for patients with COPD.