A multimodal mentorship intervention to improve surgical quality in Tanzania's Lake Zone: a convergent, mixed methods assessment.

BACKGROUND: Safe, high-quality surgical care in many African countries is a critical need. Challenges include availability of surgical providers, improving quality of care, and building workforce capacity. Despite growing evidence that mentoring is effective in African healthcare settings, less is known about its role in surgery. We examined a multimodal approach to mentorship as part of a safe surgery intervention (Safe Surgery 2020) to improve surgical quality. Our goal was to distill lessons for policy makers, intervention designers, and practitioners on key elements of a successful surgical mentorship program. METHODS: We used a convergent, mixed-methods design to examine the experiences of mentees, mentors, and facility leaders with mentorship at 10 health facilities in Tanzania's Lake Zone. A multidisciplinary team of mentors worked with surgical providers over 17 months using in-person mentorship, telementoring, and WhatsApp. We conducted surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups to capture data in four categories: (1) satisfaction with mentorship; (2) perceived impact; (3) elements of a successful mentoring program; and (4) challenges to implementing mentorship. We analyzed quantitative data using frequency analysis and qualitative data using the constant comparison method. Recurrent and unifying concepts were identified through merging the qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS: Overall, 96% of mentees experienced the intervention as positive, 88% were satisfied, and 100% supported continuing the intervention in the future. Mentees, mentors, and facility leaders perceived improvements in surgical practice, the surgical ecosystem, and in reducing postsurgical infections. Several themes related to the intervention's success emerged: (1) the intervention's design, including its multimodality, side-by-side mentorship, and standardization of practices; (2) the mentee-mentor relationship, including a friendly, safe, non-hierarchical, team relationship, as well as mentors' understanding of the local context; and (3) mentorship characteristics, including non-judgmental feedback, experience, and accessibility. Challenges included resistance to change, shortage of providers, mentorship dose, and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a multimodal mentorship approach is promising in building the capacity of surgical providers. By distilling the experiences of the mentees, mentors, and facility leaders, our lessons provide a foundation for future efforts to establish effective surgical mentorship programs that build provider capacity and ultimately improve surgical quality.

Duration on ART, Alcohol Use and HIV Stage May Predict Risky Sexual Behavior in a Resource-limited Environment: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: The intention of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and regular clinic visits are to engender safe sex attitudes among HIV-infected individuals. However, this may not be the case due to the perceived therapeutic benefits of ART and may result in exposure to drug-resistant HIV strains. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the prevalence and predict the factors associated with risky sexual behaviors among ART users in a resource-limited environment. METHODS: Two hundred and ninety-one sexually active ART-users aged 18-50 years and seeking care at the HIV clinic in Dodoma, Tanzania, participated in this study. The outcome variables modeled in a logistic regression were condom use, multiple sex partners, casual sex partners, and payment for sex. The predictors included in the models were the patients' socio-demographic characteristics. In addition, a new variable, sexual risk scores, was generated by culminating all the outcome variables. Finally, a multiple Poisson regression with the socio-demographic variables of the participants was used to model the sexual risk scores. RESULTS: Patients reported inconsistent/no condom use (44%), payment for sex (4%), casual sex encounters (13%), multiple sex partners (21%), and STD symptoms (15%). While having a casual sexual partner was significantly associated with age group in a Pearson Chi-square (p=0.0147), participants ≤35 years old were less likely to have single-sex partners than older participants (AOR: 0.188, 95 C.I: 0.042-0.849). Meanwhile, the likelihood of condom use was higher among participants with no HIV-infected family members (AOR= 2.409, 95% C.I:1.236,4.697) and among participants who had single-sex partners (AOR= 2.721, 95% C.I.: 1.115,6.640); these participants were less likely to report STD symptoms (AOR=0.265, 95% C.I.: 0.081-0.865). Adjusted analysis showed that estimated mean sexual risk scores significantly increased (mean, λ=1.61, 95% C.I:1.0817-2.4063) for recent ART recipients (within 1-3 years vs. ≥8 years). However, sexual risk scores of participants with HIV stage 3 were 38.8% lower than participants at stage 4 (95% C.I.: 0.3910-0.9558), and non-alcohol drinkers had an adjusted mean sexual risk score of 29% lower than participants who were alcohol drinkers (95% C.I.: 0.5102-0.9879). CONCLUSION: Researchers should prioritize patients at HIV CTC for education concerning safe sexual practices for those characterized by alcohol consumption, younger age (less than 35 years old), HIV stage 4, or commencement of ART within three years.

Cervical Cancer Screening among Women Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy in a Resource-Limited Environment.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is among the most prevalent cancer among women worldwide and women living with HIV are at increased risk, especially in a resource-limited environment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine levels of awareness, knowledge, uptake, and willingness to screen for cervical cancer among women receiving care in an HIV clinic at Dodoma Regional Referral Hospital (DRRH), Tanzania. METHODS: Data were collected for a period of three weeks from July 21 to August 11, 2017 using a mobile phone data collection App. A total of 421 Women aged 18-50 years old were included in the study. RESULTS: Majority of the women interviewed (n=306, 73%) were aware of cervical cancer. Among those who were aware, 84% (n=257) did not recall ever being screened for cervical cancer, and majority had a poor knowledge of cervical cancer. Educational level completed (p=0.01), income per month (p=0.02), age group (p<0.0001), and area of residence (p<0.0001) were all significantly associated to awareness of cervical cancer. Most of the women who have never screened (n=231, 91%) expressed willingness to be screened. Prior uptake of cervical cancer screening was associated with number of live births (p=0.001) and area of residence (p=0.04). And Willingness to screen was significantly associated with age groups (p=0.03) and the number of live births (p=0.03). Moreover, we found that younger age and urban residence was positively associated with awareness and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Willingness was found to decrease as age increased. CONCLUSION: The study found that despite older women's higher risk of cervical cancer, those who indicated willingness to screen were younger. Additional education, health promotion, and integration of cervical cancer screening services is needed to improve cervical cancer awareness and screening uptake at the HIV clinic.
.