RESUMEN
Objetivo: Explorar los errores más frecuentes de la técnica inhalatoria (pilar para el tratamiento farmacológico de las exacerbaciones de asma y/o enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica) en enfermeras de un servicio de urgencias, y evaluar la eficacia de una intervención educativa. Métodos: Estudio cuasiexperimental prospectivo, realizado en un hospital de Argentina durante 2019. Para la evaluación de enfermeras se utilizaron los pasos del Consenso Separ-Alat. La intervención educativa consistió en explicación oral y demostración visual de la técnica inhalatoria. Se realizó análisis de datos pareados, y se calcularon las frecuencias absolutas y relativas con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza de 95%. Resultados: Se incluyó una muestra consecutiva de 72 enfermeros, de los cuales el 95,83% (IC 95% 88,30-99,13) cometieron al menos un error en la evaluación basal. Los errores más frecuentes fueron la falta de indicación al paciente de espirar previo a la inhalación (83,72%), el olvido de retirar la aerocámara y repetir los pasos antes de la segunda dosis (81,40%). Tras la evaluación inmediata después de recibir la intervención educativa, el 74,42% (IC 95% 58,83-86,49) corrigió la técnica. Sin embargo, al mes el 53,49% (23/43; IC 95% 37,66-68,86) realizaba la técnica correctamente. Conclusiones: La intervención educativa puede ser eficaz para subsanar errores en esta práctica, aunque sus efectos tienden a extinguirse con el tiempo. Por ende, consideramos relevante la educación periódica y sistemática para mantener una técnica de inhalación correcta entre los profesionales.(AU)
Objetive: To explore the most frequent errors of the inhalation technique (main topic for the pharmacological treatment of exacerbations of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in the nursing staff of an emergency department, and to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. Methods: Prospective quasi-experimental study, carried out in a hospital in Argentina during 2019. For the evaluation of the nursing staff, the steps of the Separ-Alat Consensus were used. The educational intervention consisted of oral explanation and visual demonstration of the inhalation technique. Paired data analysis was performed, and absolute and relative frequencies were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. Results: A consecutive sample of 72 nurses was included, of which 95.83% (95% CI 88.30-99.13) made at least one error in the baseline assessment. The most frequent errors were the lack of indication to the patient to exhale prior to inhalation (83.72%), forgetting to remove the air chamber and repeat the steps before the second dose (81.40%). After immediate evaluation after receiving the educational intervention, 74.42% (95% CI 58.83-86.49) corrected the technique. However, at one month, 53.49% (23/43; 95% CI 37.66-68.86) performed the technique correctly. Conclusions: The educational intervention could be effective in correcting errors in this practice, although its effects tend to fade over time. Therefore, we consider periodic and systematic education relevant to maintain a correct inhalation technique among professionals.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Personal de Salud , Enfermería en Salud Comunitaria , Educación en Enfermería , Capacitación Profesional , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Educación Continua en Enfermería , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Asma , Administración por Inhalación , Estudios Prospectivos , 28573 , Enfermería , Argentina , Enfermeras y EnfermerosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the most frequent errors of the inhalation technique (main topic for the pharmacological treatment of exacerbations of asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) in the nursing staff of an emergency department, and to evaluate the efficacy of an educational intervention. METHODS: Prospective quasi-experimental study, carried out in a hospital in Argentina during 2019. For the evaluation of the nursing staff, the steps of the Separ-Alat Consensus were used. The educational intervention consisted of oral explanation and visual demonstration of the inhalation technique. Paired data analysis was performed, and absolute and relative frequencies were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A consecutive sample of 72 nurses was included, of which 95.83% (95%CI 88.30-99.13) made at least one error in the baseline assessment. The most frequent errors were the lack of indication to the patient to exhale prior to inhalation (83.72%), forgetting to remove the air chamber and repeat the steps before the second dose (81.40%). After immediate evaluation after receiving the educational intervention, 74.42% (95%CI 58.83-86.49) corrected the technique. However, at one month, 53.49% (23/43; 95%CI 37.66-68.86) performed the technique correctly. CONCLUSIONS: The educational intervention could be effective in correcting errors in this practice, although its effects tend to fade over time. Therefore, we consider periodic and systematic education relevant to maintain a correct inhalation technique among professionals.
Asunto(s)
Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Administración por Inhalación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a novel physiological approach for setting the tidal volume in mechanical ventilation according to inspiratory capacity, and to determine if it results in an appropriate mechanical and gas exchange measurements in healthy and critically ill dogs. METHODS: Twenty healthy animals were included in the study to assess the tidal volume expressed as a percentage of inspiratory capacity. For inspiratory capacity measurement, the mechanical ventilator was set as follows: pressure control mode with 35cmH2O of inspired pressure and zero end-expiratory pressure for 5 seconds. Subsequently, the animals were randomized into four groups and ventilated with a tidal volume corresponding to the different percentages of inspiratory capacity. Subsequently, ten critically ill dogs were studied. RESULTS: Healthy dogs ventilated with a tidal volume of 17% of the inspiratory capacity showed normal respiratory mechanics and presented expected PaCO2 values more frequently than the other groups. The respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure were significantly higher among the critically ill dogs but below 15 cmH2O in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The tidal volume based on the inspiratory capacity of each animal has proven to be a useful and simple tool when setting ventilator parameters. A similar approach should also be evaluated in other species, including human beings, if we consider the potential limitations of tidal volume titration based on the calculated ideal body weight.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar uma nova abordagem fisiológica para a determinação do volume corrente em ventilação mecânica, de acordo com a capacidade inspiratória, e determinar se isso resulta em medidas mecânicas e de troca gasosa adequadas em cães saudáveis e em estado crítico. MÉTODOS: Incluíram-se, neste estudo, 24 animais para avaliar o volume corrente expresso como porcentagem da capacidade inspiratória. Para mensuração da capacidade inspiratória, o ventilador mecânico foi regulado como segue: modo controle de pressão, com 35cmH2O de pressão de inspiração e pressão expiratória final de zero, por 5 segundos. Subsequentemente, estudaram-se dez cães em condições clínicas críticas. RESULTADOS: Cães saudáveis ventilados com volume corrente que correspondia a 17% da capacidade inspiratória demonstraram mecânica respiratória normal e apresentaram os valores previstos de PaCO2 mais frequentemente do que os animais nos demais grupos. A pressão no sistema respiratório e a pressão transpulmonar foram significantemente mais elevadas nos cães em condição crítica, porém em todos os casos, estiveram abaixo de 15cmH2O. CONCLUSÕES: O volume corrente calculado com base na capacidade inspiratória de cada animal comprovou ser uma ferramenta útil e simples para o estabelecimento dos parâmetros do ventilador. Convém também realizar abordagem semelhante em outras espécies, inclusive no ser humano, quando se consideram as potenciais limitações da titulação do volume corrente, com base no peso corpóreo ideal calculado.
Asunto(s)
Capacidad Inspiratoria/fisiología , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar/fisiología , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar/fisiología , Animales , Peso Corporal , Dióxido de Carbono/metabolismo , Enfermedad Crítica , Perros , Distribución Aleatoria , Respiración Artificial/veterinariaRESUMEN
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar uma nova abordagem fisiológica para a determinação do volume corrente em ventilação mecânica, de acordo com a capacidade inspiratória, e determinar se isso resulta em medidas mecânicas e de troca gasosa adequadas em cães saudáveis e em estado crítico. Métodos: Incluíram-se, neste estudo, 24 animais para avaliar o volume corrente expresso como porcentagem da capacidade inspiratória. Para mensuração da capacidade inspiratória, o ventilador mecânico foi regulado como segue: modo controle de pressão, com 35cmH2O de pressão de inspiração e pressão expiratória final de zero, por 5 segundos. Subsequentemente, estudaram-se dez cães em condições clínicas críticas. Resultados: Cães saudáveis ventilados com volume corrente que correspondia a 17% da capacidade inspiratória demonstraram mecânica respiratória normal e apresentaram os valores previstos de PaCO2 mais frequentemente do que os animais nos demais grupos. A pressão no sistema respiratório e a pressão transpulmonar foram significantemente mais elevadas nos cães em condição crítica, porém em todos os casos, estiveram abaixo de 15cmH2O. Conclusões: O volume corrente calculado com base na capacidade inspiratória de cada animal comprovou ser uma ferramenta útil e simples para o estabelecimento dos parâmetros do ventilador. Convém também realizar abordagem semelhante em outras espécies, inclusive no ser humano, quando se consideram as potenciais limitações da titulação do volume corrente, com base no peso corpóreo ideal calculado.
ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate a novel physiological approach for setting the tidal volume in mechanical ventilation according to inspiratory capacity, and to determine if it results in an appropriate mechanical and gas exchange measurements in healthy and critically ill dogs. Methods: Twenty healthy animals were included in the study to assess the tidal volume expressed as a percentage of inspiratory capacity. For inspiratory capacity measurement, the mechanical ventilator was set as follows: pressure control mode with 35cmH2O of inspired pressure and zero end-expiratory pressure for 5 seconds. Subsequently, the animals were randomized into four groups and ventilated with a tidal volume corresponding to the different percentages of inspiratory capacity. Subsequently, ten critically ill dogs were studied. Results: Healthy dogs ventilated with a tidal volume of 17% of the inspiratory capacity showed normal respiratory mechanics and presented expected PaCO2 values more frequently than the other groups. The respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure were significantly higher among the critically ill dogs but below 15 cmH2O in all cases. Conclusions: The tidal volume based on the inspiratory capacity of each animal has proven to be a useful and simple tool when setting ventilator parameters. A similar approach should also be evaluated in other species, including human beings, if we consider the potential limitations of tidal volume titration based on the calculated ideal body weight.