Holiday ornament-related injuries in children.

OBJECTIVES: Holiday ornament injuries in children have not been well documented in the medical literature. Our aim was to investigate the patterns of injuries sustained from these ornaments as a first measure toward prevention. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients examined in an urban pediatric emergency department over a 13-year period ending in March 2008 for holiday ornament-related injuries. Cases were identified using a computer-assisted text query followed by a manual chart review. Data collected from each chart included the child's age, sex, injury characteristics, physical examination findings, radiographic imaging, interventions, and disposition. To analyze injury rates over the years, we used a multiplicative Poisson model allowing varying exposures. RESULTS: Over the study period, we identified 76 eligible patients. The median age was 2 years (interquartile range, 1.17-3.3 years); 44.7% were female. Forty-three of the 76 cases (53.9%) involved ingestions: 35 were of holiday ornaments, and 8 were of light bulbs. All but one of these ornaments were made of glass. In 28%, there was an associated bleed either from the mouth or as a delayed gastrointestinal bleed. Other patients experienced lacerations (27.6%), eye injuries (5.1%), and minor electrocution injury (2.5%). Imaging was performed in 85%. A subspecialty consult was obtained in 23%, primarily addressing a foreign body ingestion or removal after skin exploration. The incidence rate has not changed over the years. CONCLUSIONS: Holiday ornament-related injuries primarily involve foreign body ingestions and glass-related injuries. Over half of the injuries involved small light bulbs and ornaments made of glass placed at the level a toddler can reach. Pediatricians are advised to discuss these points with families during holiday season.

Glass table-related injuries in children.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the patterns of injury sustained from glass table-related accidents to estimate whether tempered glass would prevent injuries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients in an urban pediatric emergency department between October of 1995 and May for 2007 for glass table-related accidents. Data collected included age, sex, injury characteristics, examination findings, radiographic imaging, interventions, and disposition.We used a preventability score ranging from I (fully preventable injury with safety glass) to IV (unlikely to be preventable with safety glass). RESULTS: We identified 174 eligible patients during the study period. The median age was 3.4 years (interquartile range, 2.0-6.6 years); 62.1% were boys. The face was most commonly involved (45.6%) followed by lower (23.8%) and upper extremities (18.9%). Patients younger than 5 years were associated with more facial injuries (odds ratio, 6.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.9-12.6). Radiographs were obtained in 68 patients, and computed tomographic scans in 3 (total, 40.1%). Surgical repair was needed in 143 patients (82.1%), of whom 15 (10.5%) underwent procedural sedation and 8 (5.6%) required operative management. Reviewers ranked 74 patients (42.5%) as grade I, 20 patients (11.5%) as grade II, 64 patients (36.8%) as grade III, and 16 patients (9.2%) as grade IV. CONCLUSIONS: Glass table injuries are associated with significant morbidity. More than half of the injuries may have been prevented or mitigated with the use of tempered glass. Pediatricians are advised to discourage families from the purchase of nontempered glass tables, while advocating for legislation mandating the use of tempered glass.