Insulin aggregation starts at dynamic triple interfaces, originating from solution agitation.

The consequences of agitation on protein stability are particularly relevant to therapeutic proteins. However, the precise contribution of the different effects induced by agitation in pathways leading to protein denaturation and aggregation at interfaces is not entirely understood. In particular, the contribution of a moving triple line, induced by the sweeping of a solution meniscus on a container wall upon agitation, has only been rarely assessed. In this article, we therefore designed experimental setups to analyze how mixing, shear stress, and dynamic triple interfaces influence insulin aggregation in physiological conditions. This has been achieved by controlling agitation speed, shear stress, and the extension of triple interfaces in order to shed light on the contribution of different agitation-induced effects on insulin aggregation in physiological conditions. We demonstrate that strong agitation is necessary for the onset of insulin aggregation, while the growth of the aggregates is sustained even under weak agitation. Kinetic insulin aggregation studies in conditions of intermittent wetting show that the aggregation rate correlates with the amount of dynamic triple interfaces that the proteins are exposed to. Finally, we demonstrate that the triple line, where the protein solution, the air, and a hydrophobic surface meet constitutes a preferential early aggregation site.

Surfactant Protection Efficacy at Surfaces Varies with the Nature of Hydrophobic Materials.

OBJECTIVE: Monoclonal antibodies are in contact with many different materials throughout their life cycle from production to patient administration. Plastic surfaces are commonly found in single use bags, syringes, perfusion bags and tubing and their hydrophobic nature makes them particularly prone for adsorption of therapeutic proteins. The addition of surfactants in therapeutic formulations aims at minimizing surface and interface adsorption of the active molecules. However, their protection efficacy related to the nature of the plastic material is still poorly investigated. METHODS: We use real-time surface-sensitive techniques and immunosorbent assays, to quantify surfactant and monoclonal antibody adsorption on hydrophobic model surfaces and different plastic polymers to analyse the effect of material surface properties on the level of surfactant protection. RESULTS: We show that Polysorbate 80 protects monoclonal antibodies significantly better from adsorption on a polystyrene surface than on a hexadecane self-assembled monolayer, used as a model surface with similar hydrophobicity. This enhanced protective effect on polystyrene is observed for different antibodies and also other surfactants, and its extent depends on the surfactant concentration for a given antibody concentration. A comparative adsorption study allows ranking different in-use plastics and highlights the dependence of Polysorbate 80 protection efficacy on the nature of the plastic material. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that, beyond hydrophobicity, the nature of plastic polymer surfaces affects surfactant adsorption and thereby impacts their protection efficacy in therapeutic antibody formulations.