Evaluation of the prognostic role of vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in stages I and II breast cancer patients.

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD) in 228 and 213 specimens, respectively, from stages I and II breast cancer patients (pts) enrolled in a randomized phase III adjuvant chemotherapy trial comparing epirubicin to CMF, while tamoxifen was given to all postmenopausal pts. The expression of VEGF and MVD was assessed on tissue sections formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded by immunohistochemical staining using anti-VEGF antibody of human origin and anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using chi squared test, log-rank test and Cox's regression model. Sixty four of 228 pts were classified as VEGF positive (28%) with no significant difference in the two treatment arms. In 213 pts evaluated for CD34, 103 pts (48%) were classified as MVD high. No significant association between VEGF and MVD was found, and neither were they correlated with many known prognostic factors such as age, tumor size, nodal status, and histological grade. The only significant correlations observed were between VEGF and estrogen receptor (ER) status (p = 0.013) and between MVD and HER2 overexpression (p = 0.023). At a median follow up of 96 months VEGF and MVD were not correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in all pts and in pts assigned to one of the two treatment arms. In conclusion, VEGF and MVD retrospectively evaluated, cannot be considered prognostic factors in node negative (N-) high risk and node positive (N+) breast cancer pts treated with two different regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy.

High-dose folinic acid and fluorouracil with or without ifosfamide is an inactive combination in advanced pancreatic cancer. A randomized phase II study of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (G.O.I.R.C.).

The Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research (GOIRC) randomized 55 naive patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) between intravenous fluorouracil (5FU) 400 mg/m2, days 1-5 and folinic acid (FA) 200 mg/m2, days 1-5 alone, using Machover's schedule, or with FU, FA, and ifosfamide (IFO) 5 g/m2, day 1 and Mesna. In both arms, treatment was repeated every 28 days. Fifty-one patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 6% (3 out of 51), 1 out of 29 (3%) complete response (CR) in the arm with FU plus FA, and 2 out of 22 (9%) partial responses (PR) in the arm with IFO. The duration of response rate was 39, 55, and 74 weeks, respectively. Median survival time was 21 weeks (range, 4-83 weeks) for 5FU/FA and 16 weeks (range, 3-106 weeks) for the FU/FA/IFO arm. Diarrhea, mucositis, and vomiting occurred in the majority of patients. One patient died due to toxicity. The combination of 5FU plus FA failed to demonstrate therapeutic activity in patients with APC and was associated with moderate to severe toxicity that could lower the quality of life of these patients. Ifosfamide did not potentiate the activity of this combination. Neither of these combinations should be considered for treatment of patients with APC.

Fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin combination versus PELF chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, and leucovorin preceding fluorouracil (PELF) includes three novel agents compared with the standard combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and mitomycin (FAM) in the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. We report the results of a prospective randomized comparison of the two combinations in previously untreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty assessable patients were entered onto the trial; 52 received FAM and 85 PELF. A 1:2 unbalanced randomization in favor of the experimental treatment was chosen. Approximately 90% of patients had measurable tumor masses. RESULTS: The overall response rates (complete responses [CRs] and partial responses [PRs]) were 15% and 43% for the FAM and the PELF regimens, respectively, with a statistically significant advantage for the experimental treatment (P = .001). Time to progression (median, 2.6 and 4.7 months), duration of response (median, 10.7 and 10.2 months), and survival durations (median, 5.6 and 8.1 months) were not significantly different between the FAM and PELF regimens, respectively. The PELF combination was more toxic compared with FAM, but generally tolerable. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the PELF combination is about three times more effective than the FAM combination in inducing objective responses. Due to tolerability, it is not recommended for routine clinical use. However, it should be considered, among other second-generation chemotherapy combinations, in future randomized studies aimed to improve the therapeutic outcome in gastric carcinoma.