Effect of 6-Month HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Dispensing With Interim Self-testing on Preexposure Prophylaxis Continuation at 12 Months: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Importance: Daily oral HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery requires quarterly clinic visits for HIV testing and drug refilling that are costly to health systems and clients. Objective: To evaluate whether 6-month PrEP dispensing supported with interim HIV self-testing (HIVST) results in noninferior PrEP continuation outcomes at 12 months compared with standard quarterly clinic visits. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized noninferiority trial was conducted from May 2018 to May 2021 with 12 months of follow-up among PrEP clients aged 18 years or older who were returning for their first refill at a research clinic in Kiambu County, Kenya. Intervention: Participants were randomized 2:1 to (1) 6-month PrEP dispensing with semiannual clinic visits and interim HIVST at 3 months or (2) standard-of-care (SOC) PrEP delivery with 3-month dispensing, quarterly clinic visits, and clinic-based HIV testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prespecified 12-month outcomes included recent HIV testing (any in past 6 months), PrEP refilling, and PrEP adherence (detectable tenofovir-diphosphate concentrations in dried blood spots). Binomial regression models were used to estimate risk differences (RDs), and a 1-sided 95% CI lower bound (LB) of -10% or greater was interpreted as noninferior. Results: A total of 495 participants were enrolled, with 329 enrolled in the intervention group and 166 enrolled in the SOC group; 330 (66.7%) were women, 295 (59.6%) were in serodifferent relationships, and the median (IQR) age was 33 (27-40) years. At 12 months, 241 individuals in the intervention group (73.3%) and 120 in the SOC group (72.3%) returned to clinic. In the intervention group, recent HIV testing was noninferior (230 individuals [69.9%]) compared with the SOC group (116 [69.9%]; RD, -0.33%, 95% CI LB, -7.44%). PrEP refilling in the intervention group (196 [59.6%]) was inconclusive compared with the SOC group (104 [62.7%]; RD, -3.25%; 95% CI LB, -10.84%), and PrEP adherence was noninferior in the intervention group (151 [45.9%]) compared with the SOC group (70 [42.2%]; RD, 4.96%; 95% CI LB, -2.46%). No HIV seroconversions were observed over the follow-up period. Conclusions and Relevance: In this analysis of secondary trial end points at 1 year, semiannual PrEP dispensing with interim HIVST resulted in noninferior recent HIV testing and PrEP adherence compared with SOC quarterly PrEP dispensing. This novel model has the potential to optimize PrEP delivery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593629.

Efficiency of 6-month PrEP dispensing with HIV self-testing in Kenya: an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority, implementation trial.

BACKGROUND: Oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention is highly effective and is being implemented at scale at health clinics throughout sub-Saharan Africa. However, barriers to clinic-based PrEP delivery remain. We aimed to establish the efficiency of semiannual PrEP clinic visits supplemented with interim home-based HIV self-testing (HIVST) versus standard of care for HIV testing, drug refilling, and adherence among PrEP users. METHODS: This was a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial done at the Partners in Health and Research Development clinic in Thika, Kenya. Eligible participants were HIV-negative adults (≥18 years) at risk of acquiring HIV who had started PrEP at least 1 month before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 6-month PrEP dispensing plus interim blood-based HIVST (with biannual clinic visits), 6-month PrEP dispensing plus interim oral fluid-based HIVST (with biannual clinic visits), or standard of care PrEP delivery (3-month PrEP dispensing with quarterly clinic visits). The three coprimary outcomes, measured at 6 months, were HIV testing (any testing between enrolment and the 6-month visit), PrEP refilling, and PrEP adherence (detectable tenofovir diphosphate concentration in dried blood spots). All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. We used binomial regression models to estimate risk differences and one-sided 95% CIs. 6-month PrEP dispensing was considered non-inferior to standard of care if the lower limit bound of the one-sided 95% CI was greater than or equal to -10%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03593629. FINDINGS: Between May 28, 2018, and Feb 24, 2020, 495 participants were enrolled: 165 men and 130 women in HIV serodifferent couples and 200 singly enrolled women. 166 participants were randomly assigned to the standard of care group, 163 to the 6-month PrEP dispensing plus oral-fluid HIVST group, and 166 to the 6-month PrEP dispensing plus blood-based HIVST group. At 6 months, 274 (83%) of 329 participants in the combined 6-month PrEP dispensing group had tested for HIV compared with 140 (84%) of 166 participants in the standard of care group (risk difference -1·15%, 95% CI lower bound -6·89). Among participants in the combined 6-month PrEP dispensing group, 257 (78%) participants refilled PrEP compared with 134 (81%) participants in the standard of care group (-2·60%, -8·88), and 200 (61%) participants were adherent to PrEP compared with 95 (57%) participants in the standard of care group (2·37%, -5·05). No participants acquired HIV during the study. INTERPRETATION: 6-month PrEP dispensing with HIVST for interim testing reduced the number of PrEP clinic visits in half without compromising HIV testing, retention, or adherence. FUNDING: US National Institute of Mental Health.