Management of paediatric high-grade blunt renal trauma: a 10-year single-centre UK experience.

OBJECTIVE: To report the management and outcome of paediatric patients sustaining high-grade blunt renal trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records were examined for all American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade III-V blunt renal trauma cases admitted to a paediatric trauma centre from 2005 to 2015. Data collected and analysed included: demographics, imaging modalities, management, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: In all, 18 children (12 boys, six girls) with mean (range) age 11 (4-15) years were included. According to the AAST grading criteria, 39% (seven of 18) of the patients had grade III, 50% (nine of 18) grade IV, and 11% (two of 18) grade V injuries; 44% (eight of 18) had concomitant injuries. Most of the patients were managed conservatively (89%, 16 of 18), although two of the 16 subsequently needed JJ-stent insertion during inpatient stay for symptomatic urinoma(s). In all, 11% (two of 18) of the patients required interventional radiology service(s), involving selective embolisation for life-threatening renal tract haemorrhage. Blood transfusion for renal injury exclusively was required in 11% (two of 18) of the patients. In all, 89% (16 of 18) of the patients had at least one follow-up imaging study before hospital discharge; most (13 of 16) had ultrasonography and three required computed tomography. The median (range) LOS was 11 (4-31) days. In all, 17% (three of 18) of the patients required hospital re-admission within 30 days for complications and all required interventional procedures: JJ stent for urinoma (one), embolisation of renal arterio-venous fistula (one), and embolisation for a post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm (one). Overall, the median (range) follow-up was 6 (2-60) months. In all, 78% (14 of 18) of the patients had dimercaptosuccinic acid studies, with 11 showing reductions in renal function (range 3-44%). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports a care pathway strategy advocating conservative management of high-grade renal injuries in children. However, patients may experience a relative decline in renal function with higher grade injuries indicating the need for monitoring and follow-up.

A prospective randomized trial of the effect of a soluble adhesive on the ease of dressing removal following hypospadias repair.

AIM: To determine whether the use of a novel dressing removal technique resulted in shorter removal times, reduced the child's experience of pain and/or reduced parental anxiety when compared to a standard approach. METHODS: This prospective unblinded randomized controlled trial of 53 consecutive boys undergoing primary hypospadias repair was powered using data from a prior feasibility study. Children were randomized to a standard control dressing (A) or standard dressing plus Cavilontrade mark (B) group. Removal was by (A) soaking the child and dressing in the bath or (B) application of an adhesive remover to the dressing. The primary outcome measure was dressing removal time. Secondary measures were: child pain scores on a visual analogue scale measured by the parent and nurse, and parental anxiety using the self-evaluative state anxiety measure. Data are expressed as median (range); P<0.05 is significant. RESULTS: Dressing B was significantly quicker to remove than A: B 30 min (5-86 min) vs A 40 min (17-105 min), P=0.01, Mann-Whitney. No differences in parent/nurse pain scores between the two groups were seen. There was a strong correlation between parent and nurse reporting of pain scores at the time of dressing removal (Spearman 0.79, P<0.000). No significant differences in pre- and post-dressing removal parental anxiety scores were seen (P=0.159, Mann-Whitney). Several parents had high anxiety levels at both times. CONCLUSION: The novel dressing removal approach (B) was significantly shorter than the standard one (A). There were no significant differences in child's pain or parental anxiety score between the two approaches.