Cost avoidance using linezolid for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in a specialist diabetes foot clinic.

OBJECTIVES: An audit was performed to determine whether linezolid (Zyvox, Pharmacia Limited, Sandwich, UK) was being used in accordance with local guidelines and if this had an effect on admissions for diabetes foot ulceration. METHODS: Seven hundred and four patient records from 2005 to 2010 in the Diabetes Foot Clinic, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh were audited for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections, admissions and antibiotic use. RESULTS: Seventeen percent (n = 119) of patients had proven MRSA infections. Of these, 28% (n = 33) were prescribed linezolid, 94% (n = 31) for up to 14 days and none for >28 days. Eight (24%) had repeated courses. Ninety-one percent (n = 30) either avoided admission or were discharged early with resolution of infection. Four out of 33 patients had reversible blood abnormalities. The total cost for linezolid over this period was £58 000. However, 420 bed days, costing £500/day, were avoided, producing a total saving of £210 000 on inpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid guidelines reduced lengths of stay, inpatient costs and overuse of this expensive but effective treatment.

Improved survival of diabetic foot ulcer patients 1995-2008: possible impact of aggressive cardiovascular risk management.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a strategy of aggressive cardiovascular risk management reduced the mortality associated with diabetic foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After an initial audit of outcomes demonstrating a high mortality rate in 404 diabetic foot ulcer patients with the first ulceration developing between 1995 and 1999, a new aggressive cardiovascular risk policy was introduced as standard practice at the Diabetic Foot Clinic, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, in 2001. In the first 3 years of this policy, 251 patients were screened and identified. The audit cycle was then closed by reauditing the 5-year mortality for this second group of foot ulcer patients in 2008. RESULTS: Overall 5-year mortality was reduced from 48.0% in cohort 1 to 26.8% in cohort 2 (P < 0.001). Improvement in survival was seen for both neuroischemic patients (5-year mortality of 58% reduced to 36%; relative reduction 38%) and neuropathic patients (36% reduction to 19%; relative reduction 47%) (both P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to die if they were older at the time of ulceration or had type 2 diabetes, renal impairment, or preexisting cardiovascular disease or were already taking aspirin. Prior statin use, current smoker or ex-smoker status, blood pressure, A1C, and total cholesterol were not significantly different between survivors and those who died in the follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic foot ulcer patients have a high risk of death. Survival has improved over the past 13 years. The adoption of an aggressive cardiovascular risk management policy in diabetic foot ulcer clinics is recommended for these patients.

Versajet hydroscalpel: treatment of diabetic foot ulceration.

Treatment of diabetic foot ulceration continues to be a challenge to healthcare professionals. Wound healing can be affected in a number of ways, and it is of paramount importance that wound healing is achieved as quickly as possible to minimize the risk of amputation. One key aspect of management is wound debridement. A number of techniques can be employed, including, in severe cases, surgical debridement. These case histories illustrate where the novel Versajet hydroscalpel (Smith & Nephew) would be a useful tool for debriding a foot ulcer effectively without the patient undergoing orthopaedic surgery. The Versajet debrides quickly and efficiently, and a pink and granulating wound base was achieved in all cases. It should be considered for use in specialist centres where complex diabetic foot ulcers are treated and the expertise is available to use it.