RESUMEN
Systemic inflammation is reported in normal-weight obesity (NWO) and metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), which may be linked to their increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Yet, drivers of this inflammation remain unclear. We characterized factors known to influence inflammatory status (i.e., intestinal permeability, adipose tissue, diet quality, microbiota) - and their relationships with measured inflammation - in NWO and MHO, healthy controls (CON) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO; N=80; n=20/group). Serum indicators of intestinal permeability and inflammation were assessed using ELISA and/or multiplex. Total, visceral, and percent body fat were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Fecal microbiota composition was assessed via 16S rRNA sequencing (n=9-10/group). For C-reactive protein (CRP), MUO > NWO > CON (p<0.0001). In MHO, CRP was intermediate - and similar to - both MUO and NWO. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) and the ratio of LBP to soluble CD14 (sCD14) were higher in MHO and MUO versus CON/NWO (p's<0.0001). Across correlation and regression analyses, LBP consistently displayed the strongest relationships with CRP in the entire sample (r=0.78;ß = 0.57;p's<0.0001) and in MHO (r=0.74;p<0.01), but not NWO (r=0.37;p = 0.11). Shannon index was higher in CON compared to MUO (p<0.05) and inversely correlated with CRP in the full sample (r=-0.37;p<0.05). These data are consistent with the notion that intestinal permeability is associated with low-grade inflammation in MHO, which could be implicated in this population's reported CVD risk.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Characterize experiences with cancer and perceptions of the preventable cancer burden attributable to diet among firefighters. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to assess cancer history and perceptions of cancer. SETTING: US. PARTICIPANTS: US-based firefighters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): History of cancer, perceptions of cancer, and perceptions of diet as a means to prevent cancer. ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics and use of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1) to evaluate qualitative responses. RESULTS: A total of 471 firefighters participated. Nearly half (48.4%) voiced they strongly agreed that they were at risk for cancer, whereas 44.6% agreed that changing diet could decrease cancer risk. The most common BCTTv1 codes focused on types of education, including "Instruction on how to perform the behavior" (45.1%, n = 189), followed by those centered on behavior execution (eg, "Action planning" [24.8%, n = 104]). Qualitatively, many were concerned about misinformation. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Firefighters acknowledge the role of diet in cancer risk and have a desire for knowledge and behavioral support (eg, goal setting) that includes an emphasis on evidence and tackling misinformation. This information should serve as the basis of future interventions that target diet.