Footwear and Falls in Long-Term Residential Aged Care Facilities: An Analysis of Video Capture Data.

INTRODUCTION: Several footwear characteristics have been shown to affect balance and gait patterns and may therefore influence the risk of falling in older adults. However, attributing a link between footwear and falls is inherently difficult as it often relies on self-report which may be inaccurate. METHODS: Archival video recordings of falls that occurred in two long-term residential aged care facilities were initially screened to determine whether the footwear worn at the time (barefoot, socks, slippers/sandals, or shoes) could be documented. These falls were then independently evaluated by three additional assessors and a meeting was held to obtain consensus in relation to whether the footwear could have potentially contributed to the fall, and what mechanism may have been responsible. Cross-tabulations were performed in relation to footwear type and fall characteristics (proposed mechanism and fall direction). RESULTS: There were 300 falls experienced by 118 older adults aged 58 years-98 years (mean age 82.8 years, SD 7.6). Of these falls, footwear could be ascertained in 224 (75%). After the consensus meeting, the proportion of falls considered to be potentially related to footwear was 40 (18%). The likelihood of footwear contributing to the fall was highest when participants were wearing socks (14/19 falls; 74% of all footwear-related falls), followed by being barefoot (2/6 falls; 33%), wearing slippers/sandals (17/100 falls; 17%), and wearing shoes (7/99 falls, 7%). CONCLUSION: Footwear could be a potential contributor to a substantial number of falls in residential aged care. Wearing socks would appear to place an older person at risk of future falls and should therefore be avoided in this population.

Impact of Occupation on 12-Month Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Male Patients.

Background: The impact of a physically demanding occupation on clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is largely unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of occupation on 12-month outcomes after ACLR in male patients. It was hypothesized that patients undertaking manual work would not only have better functional outcomes in terms of strength and range of motion but also higher rates of joint effusion and greater anterior knee laxity. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: From an initial cohort of 1829 patients, we identified 372 eligible patients aged 18 to 30 years who underwent primary ACLR between 2014 and 2017. Based on a preoperative self-assessment, 2 groups were established: patients engaged in heavy manual occupations and those engaged in low-impact occupations. Data were collected from a prospective database including effusion, knee range of motion (using side-to-side difference), anterior knee laxity, limb symmetry index for single hop and triple hop, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and complications up to 12 months. Because of the significantly lower rate of female patients undertaking heavy manual occupations compared to low-impact occupations (12.5% and 40.0%, respectively), data analysis was focused on male patients. Outcome variables were assessed for normality, and statistical comparisons were made between the heavy manual and low-impact groups using either an independent-samples t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Of 230 male patients, 98 were included in the heavy manual occupation group, and 132 were included in the low-impact occupation group. Patients in the heavy manual occupation group were significantly younger than those in the low-impact occupation group (mean age, 24.1 vs 25.9 years, respectively; P < .005). There was a greater range of active and passive knee flexion in the heavy manual occupation group than in the low-impact occupation group (mean active, 3.38° vs 5.33°, respectively [P = .021]; mean passive, 2.76° vs 5.00°, respectively [P = .005]). There was no difference in effusion, anterior knee laxity, limb symmetry index, IKDC score, return-to-sport rate, or graft rupture rate at 12 months. Conclusion: At 12 months after primary ACLR, male patients engaged in heavy manual occupations had a greater range of knee flexion, with no difference in the effusion rate or anterior knee laxity, compared with those engaged in low-impact occupations.

Anterior Knee Pain Following Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty With Posterior-Stabilized Prosthesis and Patellar Resurfacing: Prevalence and Clinical Implications.

BACKGROUND: Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with patient dissatisfaction. Factors related to postoperative anterior knee pain and its impact on patient outcomes are poorly understood. The following are the aims of this study: (1) to report the prevalence of anterior knee pain before and after TKA using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis with routine patellar resurfacing; (2) to investigate the association of preoperative clinical factors with the presence of anterior knee pain after TKA; and (3) to explore the association of postoperative anterior knee pain with postoperative self-reported function and quality of life. METHODS: This retrospective study included 506 patients who had undergone elective primary unilateral TKA with a posterior-stabilized prosthesis and patellar resurfacing. Outcome measures prior to and 12 months after TKA included self-reported anterior knee pain, knee function, and quality of life. RESULTS: Prevalence of anterior knee pain was 72% prior to and 15% following TKA. Patients who had preoperative anterior knee pain had twice the risk of experiencing anterior knee pain after TKA than patients who did not have preoperative anterior knee pain (risk ratio: 2.37, 95% CI 1.73-2.96). Greater severity of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function were associated with the presence of postoperative anterior knee pain (rho = 0.15, P < .01; rho = 0.13, P < .01, respectively). Preoperative age, gender, and quality of life were not associated with postoperative anterior knee pain. Greater severity of postoperative anterior knee pain was associated with worse knee function at 12 months postoperative (rho = 0.49, P < .01). CONCLUSION: One in 7 patients reported anterior knee pain 12 months following posterior-stabilized and patella-resurfaced TKA. The presence of preoperative anterior knee pain and worse self-reported function are associated with postoperative anterior knee pain.

Is There an Association in Young Patients Between Quadriceps or Hamstring Strength After ACL Reconstruction and Graft Rupture?

Background: Younger patients who sustain anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are at high risk for reinjury after ACL reconstruction. Restoring muscle strength before return to sports (RTS) is regarded as an important factor in reducing the reinjury risk, and quadriceps and hamstring strength assessment is commonly included in RTS testing. However, it is not clear whether reduced strength is a risk factor for subsequent graft rupture in this patient population. Purpose: To investigate the association between quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months after primary ACL reconstruction and ACL graft rupture in young patients. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The cohort consisted of 210 patients (100 men and 110 women) who were younger than 20 years at the time of primary ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft and who had no previous contralateral ACL injury. Isokinetic strength testing (60 and 180 deg/s) of knee flexors and extensors was performed at 12 months postoperatively, and the limb symmetry index (LSI) for each strength outcome was calculated. RTS rates and the incidence of further ACL graft ruptures were recorded. Results: Measures of central tendency (mean and median) of LSI values ranged from 88 to 98. The percentage of patients with LSI ≥90 was 57% to 69% for quadriceps strength and 45% to 47% for hamstring strength. Overall, 19 patients (9%) sustained an ACL graft rupture. No significant differences were found between the patients who sustained an ACL graft rupture and those who did not in terms of quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months. No significant associations were found between achieving LSI ≥90 for quadriceps peak torque and subsequent ACL graft rupture. Conclusion: In young patients who underwent an ACL reconstruction, no association was noted between quadriceps and hamstring strength at 12 months postoperatively and subsequent graft ruptures. The role of strength testing as part of the RTS criteria after ACL reconstruction, and specifically the use of limb symmetry thresholds, warrants further investigation and clarification.

Differences in accuracy and consistency in elite lawn bowlers.

The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences in the accuracy and consistency of repeated lawn bowl deliveries between different bowling conditions and to describe the bias of bowls that missed the target (jack). Twenty-seven elite lawn bowl athletes were recruited to partake in the study. Participants delivered 16 bowls in four conditions: (i) forehand and (ii) backhand towards a target 23 metres away and (iii) forehand and (iv) backhand towards a target 27 metres away. The resting position of each bowl relative to the jack was described in terms of absolute displacement, width displacement and length displacement. For each participant and each condition, the average absolute displacement of deliveries was calculated as a measure of accuracy; the average width and length displacement was used to describe the bias of deliveries; and the bivariate variable error of absolute displacement was calculated as a measure of consistency. The forehand towards a target 23 metres away was significantly less accurate and consistent when compared with other conditions. There was a bias for greater width displacement of both forehand deliveries (p < 0.001). Analysing lawn bowls in this detail provides specific areas for coaching to improve lawn bowling performance.

The Assessment, Management and Prevention of Calf Muscle Strain Injuries: A Qualitative Study of the Practices and Perspectives of 20 Expert Sports Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Despite calf muscle strain injuries (CMSI) being problematic in many sports, there is a dearth of research to guide clinicians dealing with these injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practices and perspectives of a select group of international experts regarding the assessment, management and prevention of CMSI using in-depth semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Twenty expert clinicians working in elite sport and/or clinician-researchers specialising in the field completed interviews. A number of key points emerged from the interviews. Characteristics of CMSI were considered unique compared to other muscle strains. Rigor in the clinical approach clarifies the diagnosis, whereas ongoing monitoring of calf capacity and responses to loading exposure provides the most accurate estimate of prognosis. Athlete intrinsic characteristics, injury factors and sport demands shaped rehabilitation across six management phases, which were guided by key principles to optimise performance at return to play (RTP) while avoiding subsequent injury or recurrence. To prevent CMSI, periodic monitoring is common, but practices vary and data are collected to inform load-management and exercise selection rather than predict future CMSI. A universal injury prevention program for CMSI may not exist. Instead, individualised strategies should reflect athlete intrinsic characteristics and sport demands. CONCLUSIONS: Information provided by experts enabled a recommended approach to clinically evaluate CMSI to be outlined, highlighting the injury characteristics considered most important for diagnosis and prognosis. Principles for optimal management after CMSI were also identified, which involved a systematic approach to rehabilitation and the RTP decision. Although CMSI were reportedly difficult to prevent, on- and off-field strategies were implemented by experts to mitigate risk, particularly in susceptible athletes.

Knee strength deficits following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ between quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts.

PURPOSE: To compare patient reported outcomes and functional knee recovery following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using either a quadriceps tendon (QT) or hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. METHODS: Thirty-five QT patients (age 20; range 15-34 years) participated in this study and were matched for gender, age and pre-injury activity level to 70 HT (age 20; range 15-32 years) patients. The following assessments were performed at 6 and 12 months post-operatively; standardized patient-reported outcome measures (IKDC, KOOS-QOL, ACL-RSI, Marx activity, anterior knee pain), knee range of motion (passive and active), anterior knee laxity, hop tests (single and triple crossover hop for distance), and isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors. All dependent variables were analysed using a two-way mixed ANOVA model, with within (Time; 6 and 12 months) and between-subject (Graft; QT and HT) factors. RESULTS: Patient reported outcome measures and hop performance improved between 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001), however no significant differences in either patient-reported outcomes or hop performance were found between the two grafts. Isokinetic strength testing showed both groups improved their peak knee extensor strength in the operated limb between 6 and 12 months (p < 0.001), but the QT group had significantly lower knee extensor strength symmetry at both time points compared to HT at 60 deg/s (p < 0.001) and 180 deg/s (p < 0.01). In contrast, the QT group had significantly greater knee flexor strength symmetry at both time points compared to HT at 60 deg/s (p < 0.01) and 180 deg/s (p = 0.01), but knee flexor strength limb symmetry did not significantly improve over time in either group. CONCLUSION: Recovery of knee function following either QT or HT ACL reconstruction continues between 6 and 12 months after surgery. However, knee extensor strength deficits in the QT group and knee flexor strength deficits in the HT persisted at 12 months. This may have implications for decisions regarding return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The Effectiveness of Aquatic Plyometric Training in Improving Strength, Jumping, and Sprinting: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Aquatic plyometric training may provide benefits due to reduced joint loading compared with land plyometric training; however, the reduced loading may also limit performance gains. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effect of aquatic plyometric training on strength, performance outcomes, soreness, and adverse events in healthy individuals. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Five databases were searched from inception to June 2020. Quality assessment and data extraction were independently completed by 2 investigators. When similar outcome measures were used, standardized mean differences were calculated. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 19 randomized controlled trials with 633 participants (mean age, range 14-30 y) were included. Aquatic plyometric training was most commonly performed in waist to chest deep water (12/19 studies), 2 to 3 times per week for 6 to 12 weeks (18/19 studies), with final program foot contacts ranging from 120 to 550. Meta-analyses were not completed due to the clinical and statistical heterogeneity between studies. Compared with land plyometric training, aquatic plyometric training exercises and dosage were replicated (15/16 studies) and showed typically similar performance gains (3/4 knee extensor strength measures, 2/4 leg extensor strength measures, 3/4 knee flexor strength measures, 7/10 vertical jump measures, 3/3 sprint measures). In total, 2 of 3 studies monitoring muscle soreness reported significantly less soreness following training in water compared with on land. Compared with no active training (no exercise control group or passive stretching), most effect sizes demonstrated a mean improvement favoring aquatic plyometric training (23/32 measures). However, these were not significant for the majority of studies measuring isokinetic knee strength, vertical jump, and sprinting. The effect sizes for both studies assessing leg press strength indicated that aquatic plyometric training is significantly more effective than no training. CONCLUSION: Aquatic plyometric training appears similarly effective to land plyometric exercise for improving strength, jumping, and sprinting and may be indicated when joint impact loading needs to be minimized. However, the low quality of studies limits the strength of the conclusions.

Effects of Shoe-Stiffening Inserts on Lower Extremity Kinematics in Individuals With First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of shoe-stiffening inserts on lower extremity kinematics in individuals with first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Forty-eight individuals with radiographically confirmed first MTP joint OA (24 male and 24 female; mean ± SD age 57.8 ± 10.5 years) were randomized to receive either shoe-stiffening inserts or sham inserts and underwent gait analysis during level walking using a 10-camera infrared Vicon motion analysis system. Sagittal plane kinematics of the first MTP, ankle, knee, and hip joints were compared between the shoe only (control) and insert conditions in both groups (within-groups) and between both insert conditions (between-groups). RESULTS: Compared to the shoe only condition, the sham insert reduced knee flexion and total excursion, and the shoe-stiffening insert reduced first MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and ankle joint maximum plantarflexion, and increased maximum knee flexion and total excursion. Between-group comparisons indicated that the shoe-stiffening inserts significantly decreased first MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion, ankle joint maximum plantarflexion, and total excursion and increased knee joint maximum flexion and total excursion compared to the sham inserts. CONCLUSION: Carbon fiber shoe-stiffening inserts significantly alter sagittal plane lower extremity joint kinematics during walking, particularly first MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms that may be responsible for their clinical effectiveness in the treatment of first MTP joint OA and potentially explain changes in symptoms in other lower extremity joints.

Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses to reduce pain and increase physical activity in people with hip osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised feasibility trial.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this randomised feasibility trial is to determine the feasibility of conducting an adequately powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the efficacy of prefabricated contoured foot orthoses in people with hip osteoarthritis (OA). The secondary aims of the trial are to compare the effect of prefabricated contoured foot orthoses to a flat shoe insert comparator on outcomes of hip-related pain, physical activity and quality of life. We hypothesise that the demand, implementation, acceptability and practicality of foot orthoses as a treatment option for people with hip OA will be deemed feasible, informing the development of an adequately powered RCT to evaluate the efficacy and long term outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will recruit 28 people with hip OA who will be randomised to receive either prefabricated contoured foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts to use for a 6-week period. Both groups will receive standardised education on hip OA and physical activity. The study's primary outcome is the feasibility domains of demand, implementation, acceptability and practicality. The secondary outcomes include the change in Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Brief Fear of Movement Scale for OA, Physical activity accelerometry and the Physical Activity Questionnaire-short form. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe feasibility outcomes with limited efficacy analysis used for the secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models will be used to analyse between-group differences at 6 weeks, with baseline values used as covariates, treatment allocation as a fixed factor and participant as a random factor. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the La Trobe University Human Research Ethics Committee (HEC20427), St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 266/20) and Northern Health Research Governance (NH-2021-292862). The results will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05138380.

Lower limb kinematics differ at the time of foot contact between successful and unsuccessful single limb landings following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in lower extremity kinematics at initial ground contact between successful and unsuccessful single limb landings following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Controlled laboratory environment. PARTICIPANTS: 22 male participants (aged 17-40 years) who had undergone unilateral ACL reconstruction attended a single test session. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Within-subjects comparisons was performed for pelvis, hip, knee and ankle kinematics using paired t-tests. RESULTS: When unsuccessful at landing on the ACL reconstructed limb, participants had significantly increased knee flexion (P = 0.04) and reduced ankle plantarflexion (P = 0.03) compared to their successful landings. In contrast, when unsuccessful at landing on the unaffected limb, participants had significantly increased pelvic contralateral hitch (P < 0.01) and increased hip abduction (P < 0.01) compared to successful landings. CONCLUSION: Body position at the time of initial contact was different for landings that were successful compared to landings that were unsuccessful. These differences were limb-specific: altered position in sagittal plane preceded unsuccessful landings on the reconstructed limb whereas altered position in the coronal plane body position that preceded unsuccessful landings on the unaffected limb. These findings suggest that limb specific landing strategies may be required to improve athletes' performance following ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Strength deficits and flexion range of motion following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction differ between quadriceps and hamstring autografts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon (QT) could achieve faster postoperative recovery compared with hamstring tendon (HT) ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Thirty-seven QT patients were matched for gender, age and preinjury activity level with 74 HT patients. A 6-month postoperative assessment included standardised reported outcome measures: patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) (International Knee Documentation Committee-subjective knee evaluation form, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-knee related quality of life subscale, ACL-Return to Sport after Injury scale, Marx activity scale, anterior knee pain), range of motion (active, standing and passive), anterior knee laxity testing, hop tests (single and triple crossover hop for distance) and isokinetic strength testing of the knee extensors and flexors. T-tests or Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare data between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the PROMs. The HT group had reduced active and standing knee flexion range compared with the QT group (p<0.001). Isokinetic strength testing showed significant deficits in limb symmetry indices for both concentric hamstring peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.01) in the HT group. There were significantly greater deficits in limb symmetry indices for concentric quadriceps peak torque at 60°/s (p<0.001) and 180°/s (p=0.001) in the QT group. CONCLUSION: The QT graft does not appear to offer a more rapid recovery in terms of knee symptoms or function which could have allowed for faster progression to the dynamic phases of rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Is the KiRA Device Useful in Quantifying the Pivot Shift in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees?

BACKGROUND: Various technologies have been developed to quantify the pivot shift, as it is regarded as a key indicator of anterolateral rotatory laxity of the knee. PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of a commercially available triaxial accelerometer (Kinematic Rapid Assessment [KiRA]) in numerically quantifying the pivot shift in patients under anesthesia with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Both knees of 50 patients (26 male [mean age, 30.4 years], 24 female [mean age, 26.6 years]) under anesthesia were assessed immediately before unilateral ACL reconstruction by an orthopaedic fellow and 1 of 3 experienced knee surgeons. The pivot-shift grade and 2 KiRA outputs (range of acceleration and slope of acceleration change) were compared. RESULTS: The surgeon and fellow recorded the same pivot-shift grade for 45 of 50 patients (90%). Data from the 5 patients with no agreement and 1 patient with extreme outlying data were excluded from subsequent analysis. Using the KiRA range and slope data, the surgeon identified the injured knee in 74% and 76% of patients, respectively, while the fellow's rate of injured knee identification was 74% and 80%, respectively. A correlation could be found only between pivot-shift grade and surgeon-derived range data (ρ = 0.40; P < .01) but not slope data or any fellow-derived outputs. Using the surgeon-derived range data, there was a significant difference between a grade 3 pivot (>5 m/s2) and a grade 1 or 2 pivot (<5 m/s2) (P = .01). CONCLUSION: Although a correlation between KiRA output data and pivot-shift grade was found when the device was used by an experienced surgeon, there was no correlation when used by a well-trained but less experienced orthopaedic fellow. Furthermore, the KiRA output data identified the ACL-deficient knee correctly in only 74% of patients. Although a threshold acceleration range value could be identified, above which the value was associated with a grade 3 pivot shift, this was dependent on the examiner, and distinction between other grades could not be made.

Efficacy of heel lifts versus calf muscle eccentric exercise for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy (HEALTHY): a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of in-shoe heel lifts to calf muscle eccentric exercise in reducing pain and improving function in mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy. METHODS: This was a parallel-group randomised superiority trial at a single centre (La Trobe University Health Sciences Clinic, Discipline of Podiatry, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia). One hundred participants (52 women and 48 men, mean age 45.9, SD 9.4 years) with clinically diagnosed and ultrasonographically confirmed mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy were randomly allocated to either a (1) heel lifts (n=50) or (2) eccentric exercise (n=50) group. The primary outcome measure was the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire at 12 weeks. Differences between groups were analysed using intention to treat with analysis of covariance. RESULTS: There was 80% follow-up of participants (n=40 per group) at 12 weeks. The mean VISA-A score improved by 26.0 points (95% CI 19.6 to 32.4) in the heel lifts group and by 17.4 points (95% CI 9.5 to 25.3) in the eccentric exercise group. On average, there was a between-group difference in favour of the heel lifts for the VISA-A (adjusted mean difference 9.6, 95% CI 1.8 to 17.4, p=0.016), which approximated, but did not meet our predetermined minimum important difference of 10 points. CONCLUSION: In adults with mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy, heel lifts were more effective than calf muscle eccentric exercise in reducing pain and improving function at 12 weeks. However, there is uncertainty in the estimate of effect for this outcome and patients may not experience a clinically worthwhile difference between interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001225303.

Knee muscle strength after quadriceps tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Restoration of knee muscle strength is associated with better outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but little is known about the outcome of strength following quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) ACL reconstruction in relation to other graft types. The aim of this review was to evaluate strength outcomes of the knee extensors and knee flexors following QT ACL reconstruction compared to (1) the non-reconstructed contralateral limb and (2) alternative ACL graft types. METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched up until 21st February 2020. Summary meta-analyses were performed comparing knee strength outcomes following QT ACL reconstruction to the contralateral limb by way of limb symmetry index (LSI). Comparative meta-analyses were performed comparing QT ACL reconstruction to alternative ACL grafts for the two most frequently reported strength outcome measures which were peak knee extensor torque LSI, and peak knee flexor torque LSI at the following post-operative periods: 3, 5-8, 9-15, 24, 36-60 months. RESULTS: In total, 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Knee strength outcomes of 952 QT ACL reconstructions were included and compared to either the contralateral limb or 1 of 4 alternative ACL graft types; 245 hamstring tendon autograft (HT), 143 patellar tendon autograft (PT), 45 quadriceps tendon allograft, and 21 tibialis anterior allograft. Knee extensor strength LSI following QT ACL reconstruction did not reach 90% even at 24 months post-operatively. Conversely, knee flexor strength LSI following QT ACL reconstruction exceeded 90% at the 9-15 months post-operative period. Knee extensor strength at 5-8 months following QT ACL reconstruction appears similar to PT but weaker than HT ACL reconstruction. In addition, peak knee flexor LSI was significantly greater at 5-8 months in QT ACL reconstruction patients compared to HT patients. CONCLUSION: The decision to utilize a QT graft for ACL reconstruction should include consideration of strength outcomes. Knee extensor strength recovery following QT ACL reconstruction appears not to be restored before 24 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Return to Play and Recurrence After Calf Muscle Strain Injuries in Elite Australian Football Players.

BACKGROUND: Calf muscle strain injuries (CMSI) are prevalent in sport, but information about factors associated with time to return to play (RTP) and recurrence is limited. PURPOSE: To determine whether clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data are associated with RTP and recurrence after CMSI. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data of 149 CMSI reported to the Soft Tissue injury Registry of the Australian Football League were explored to evaluate the impact of clinical data and index injury MRI findings on RTP and recurrence. Clinical data included age, previous injury history, ethnicity, and the mechanism of injury. RESULTS: Irrespective of the anatomical location, players with CMSI with severe aponeurotic disruption (AD) took longer to RTP than players with CMSI with no AD: 31.3 ± 12.6 days vs 19.4 ± 10.8 days (mean ± SD; P = .003). A running-related mechanism of injury was associated with a longer RTP period for CMSI overall (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.59; P = .02). The presence of AD was associated with a longer RTP period for soleus injuries (AHR, 0.6; P = .025). Early recurrence (ie, ≤2 months of the index injury) was associated with older age (AHR, 1.3; P = .001) and a history of ankle injury (AHR, 3.9; P = .032). Older age (AHR, 1.1; P = .013) and a history of CMSI (AHR, 6.7; P = .002) increased the risk of recurrence within 2 seasons. The index injury MRI findings were not associated with risk of recurrence. CONCLUSION: A running-related mechanism of injury and the presence of AD on MRI were associated with a longer RTP period. Clinical rather than MRI data best indicate the risk of recurrent CMSI.

Single-Leg Squat After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of the Knee Valgus Angle at 6 and 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: Deficits in neuromuscular control are common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and may be associated with further knee injury. The knee valgus angle during a single-leg squat (SLS) is one measure of neuromuscular performance. PURPOSE: To determine whether the knee valgus angle during SLS changes between 6 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction and to assess how the operative knee valgus angle compares with that of the contralateral side. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A cohort of 100 patients with uninjured contralateral knees were assessed at 6 and 12 months after primary hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction. Participants performed the SLS on each leg, and the knee valgus angle was measured via frame-by-frame video analysis at 30° of flexion and at each patient's maximum knee flexion angle. RESULTS: For the operative limb at 30° of flexion, a small but statistically significant reduction was noted in the valgus angle between 6 and 12 months (5.46° vs 4.44°; P = .002; effect size = 0.24). At 6 months, a slightly higher valgus angle was seen in the operative limb compared with the nonoperative limb (5.46° vs 4.29°; P = .008; effect size = 0.27). At maximum flexion, no difference was seen between limbs in the valgus angle at either 6 or 12 months, and no change was seen in the operative limb between 6 and 12 months. At 6 months and 30° of knee flexion, 13 patients had a valgus angle greater than 10°. This group also had a higher mean valgus angle in the contralateral limb compared with the contralateral limb in the other 87 patients (8.5° vs 3.65°; P < .001). CONCLUSION: During a controlled SLS, the knee valgus angle remained essentially constant, and minimal limb asymmetries were present over the 6- to 12-month postoperative period, a time when athletes typically increase their activity levels. Whether changes or asymmetries will be seen with more dynamically challenging tasks remains to be determined. When present, high valgus angles were commonly bilateral.

First metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion is associated with lower limb kinematics in individuals with first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (1st MTP joint OA) is a common and disabling condition that results in pain and limited joint range of motion. There is inconsistent evidence regarding the relationship between clinical measurement of 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and dynamic function of the joint during level walking. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the association between passive non-weightbearing (NWB) 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and sagittal plane kinematics in individuals with radiographically confirmed 1st MTP joint OA. METHODS: Forty-eight individuals with radiographically confirmed 1st MTP joint OA (24 males and 24 females; mean age 57.8 years, standard deviation 10.5) underwent clinical measurement of passive NWB 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and gait analysis during level walking using a 10-camera infrared Vicon motion analysis system. Sagittal plane kinematics of the 1st MTP, ankle, knee, and hip joints were calculated. Associations between passive NWB 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and kinematic variables were explored using Pearson's r correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Passive NWB 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion was significantly associated with maximum 1st MTPJ dorsiflexion (r = 0.486, p < 0.001), ankle joint maximum plantarflexion (r = 0.383, p = 0.007), and ankle joint excursion (r = 0.399, p = 0.005) during gait. There were no significant associations between passive NWB 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion and sagittal plane kinematics of the knee or hip joints. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that clinical measurement of 1st MTP joint maximum dorsiflexion provides useful insights into the dynamic function of the foot and ankle during the propulsive phase of gait in this population.

The validity of using activity monitors to detect step count after lumbar fusion surgery.

Purpose: Measuring step count using activity monitors is an increasingly popular method of quantifying physical activity, however it is unknown whether gait irregularities or the use of gait aids affect the accuracy of these devices. This study evaluates the validity of the ActivPAL3, Fitbit Flex, and Jawbone UP Move activity monitors for measuring step count in hospital inpatients after lumbar fusion.Methods: The ActivPAL3 was tested on the thigh, the Fitbit, and the Jawbone were tested on the wrist and thigh, each monitor was tested 20 times. Validity was examined by calculating the percentage of steps detected by each monitor compared to the criterion measure of observed step count, the Standard Error of Measurement, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.Results: The ActivPAL3 detected 85% (SD 27%) of observed steps. On the wrist, the Fitbit detected 24% (SD 34%) and the Jawbone detected 17% (SD 40%) of observed steps. On the thigh, the Fitbit detected 66% (SD 42%) and the Jawbone detected 22% (SD 35%) of observed steps.Conclusion: The ActivPAL3 activity monitor is a sufficiently valid tool to detect step count immediately after lumbar fusion. Wrist worn monitors are not recommended in this population, particularly with patients using gait aids.Implications for RehabilitationWalking may be quantified using activity monitoring, as both an assessment tool and as an adjunct to treatmentThe ActivPAL3 is sufficiently valid for use after lumbar fusion surgeryThe Fitbit Flex and Jawbone UP Move had low accuracy, particularly when a gait aid was used.

Calf muscle strain injuries in elite Australian Football players: A descriptive epidemiological evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Calf muscle strain injuries (CMSI) show consistent rates of prevalence and re-injury in elite Australian Football players. An epidemiological evaluation is warranted to better understand the clinical presentation and recovery of CMSI. PURPOSE: First, to describe the epidemiology of CMSI in elite Australian Football players. Second, to determine if recovery following injury is different according to: (a) injury type (index vs re-injury); (b) muscle injured (soleus vs gastrocnemius); and (c) mechanism of injury (running-related activity vs non running-related activity). STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological. METHODS: Data retrieved from the Soft Tissue injury Registry of the Australian Football League were analyzed. Sixteen clubs submitted data on CMSI from 2014 to 2017. Data included: player characteristics, training and match history at the time of injury, MRI, and the time to reach recovery milestones. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four CMSI were included (149 index injuries; 35 re-injuries). Soleus injuries were most prevalent (84.6%). Soleus injuries took 25.4 ± 16.2 days to return to play, whereas gastrocnemius injuries took 19.1 ± 14.1 days (P = .097). CMSI sustained during running-related activities took approximately 12 days longer to recover than injuries sustained during non running-related activities (P = .001). Compared to index injuries, re-injuries involved older players (P = .03) and significantly more time was taken to run at >90% of maximum speed, return to full training, and return to play (P ≤ .001). Almost all of the observed re-injuries involved soleus (91.4%). CONCLUSION: Soleus injuries are more prevalent than gastrocnemius injuries in elite Australian Football players. Prognosis appears to be influenced by clinical factors, with CMSI sustained during running-related activities and re-injuries needing more time to recover.