Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev ; 38(6): e3546, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35578575

RESUMEN

AIMS: To identify clinical features and protein biomarkers associated with bladder cancer (BC) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus presenting with haematuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collected from the Haematuria Biomarker (HaBio) study was used in this analysis. A matched sub-cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and patients without diabetes was created based on age, sex, and BC diagnosis, using approximately a 1:2 fixed ratio. Randox Biochip Array Technology and ELISA were applied for measurement of 66 candidate serum and urine protein biomarkers. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank sum test for clinical features and candidate protein biomarkers. Diagnostic protein biomarker models were identified using Lasso-based binominal regression analysis. RESULTS: There was no difference in BC grade, stage, and severity between individuals with type 2 diabetes and matched controls. Incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was significantly higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.008), and CKD was significantly associated with BC in patients with type 2 diabetes (p = 0.032). A biomarker model, incorporating two serum (monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and vascular endothelial growth factor) and three urine (interleukin 6, cytokeratin 18, and cytokeratin 8) proteins, predicted incidence of BC with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.84 in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In people without diabetes, the AUC was 0.66. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the potential clinical utility of a biomarker panel, which includes proteins related to BC pathogenesis and type 2 diabetes, for monitoring risk of BC in patients with type 2 diabetes. Earlier urology referral of patients with type 2 diabetes will improve outcomes for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN25823942.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hematuria/diagnóstico , Hematuria/etiología , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular
2.
Practitioner ; 261(1801): 11-5, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29020719

RESUMEN

Nephrotic syndrome is defined by a triad of clinical features: oedema, substantial proteinuria (> 3.5 g/24 hours) and hypoalbuminaemia (< 30 g/L). It is often associated with hyperlipidaemia, thromboembolism and an increased risk of infection. Nephrotic syndrome develops following pathological injury to renal glomeruli. This may be a primary problem, with a disease specific to the kidneys, or secondary to a systemic disorder such as diabetes mellitus. The most common cause in children is minimal change glomerulonephritis. In white adults, nephrotic syndrome is most frequently due to membranous nephropathy whereas in populations of African ancestry the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome is focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Diabetic nephropathy is the most common multisystem disease that can cause nephrotic syndrome. Patients typically present with periorbital oedema (most noticeable in the morning) or dependent pitting oedema (more common later in the day). Proteinuria should be documented by a quantitative measurement e.g. urine protein: creatinine ratio (PCR) or albumin: creatinine ratio (ACR). PCR > 300-350 mg/mmol indicates nephrotic range proteinuria. Urgent referral to a nephrologist (ideally within 2 weeks) is necessary and a renal biopsy is usually performed. This will establish what form of glomerular disease is responsible. Additional tests may be undertaken to assess if nephrotic syndrome is secondary to another disorder e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus or amyloidosis.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Riñón , Síndrome Nefrótico , Adulto , Biopsia/métodos , Niño , Nefropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/diagnóstico , Hiperlipidemias/etiología , Hipoalbuminemia/diagnóstico , Hipoalbuminemia/etiología , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Riñón/patología , Riñón/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Nefrosis Lipoidea/complicaciones , Síndrome Nefrótico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Nefrótico/etnología , Síndrome Nefrótico/etiología , Síndrome Nefrótico/terapia , Proteinuria/diagnóstico , Proteinuria/etiología , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...