RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Fast gut cutaneous sutures have become more prominent due to their low tissue reactivity, rapid absorption, and elimination of suture removal visits. It is not known how fast gut sutures compare to other closure modalities. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing fast gut sutures to alternative closure methods during dermatologic surgery. Data collected included patient and physician assessed cosmetic outcome as well as standardized complication rates. RESULTS: Six studies were included in final analysis and reported on 208 patients. Fast gut sutures were associated with lower physician opinions of final scar when compared to polypropylene sutures (SMD 0.438; 95% CI 0.082 to 0.794). No differences existed between physician opinion of fast gut sutures and cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (SMD - 0.024; 95% CI - 0.605 to 0.556). Complications with fast gut suture placement were rare, and included infection, dehiscence, and hematomas. Fast gut sutures were less likely to experience wound dehiscence than tissue adhesive (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: If no contraindications to polypropylene sutures exist, they may provide superior cosmetic outcomes compared to fast gut sutures. Further research is required to better quantify cosmetic outcomes and optimal use of fast gut sutures.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Sutura/efectos adversos , Adhesivos Tisulares/efectos adversos , Polipropilenos , Cicatriz/etiología , Cicatriz/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Cianoacrilatos/administración & dosificación , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
Introduction: At home suture or staple removal can be stressful for patients and may lead some to seek out additional instruction via online resources as an adjunct to what was explained to them by their provider. The purpose of this study was to examine the existing online resources available to patients who may be interested in or have been instructed to remove sutures at home after a simple procedure, such as a skin biopsy or excision. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using internet search engines to identify videos and webpages targeting at home suture removal instruction. The DISCERN instrument was used to evaluate the information quality of each included resource. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between average DISCERN scores for videos and webpage resources, and the majority were rated poor in quality. Conclusions: The online resources for at home suture and staple removal were often not comprehensive and were below the standard quality for written information. Health care providers should consider referring their patients to validated online sources for suture removal to prevent misinformation and improve patient safety.
RESUMEN
The Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS30) was designed to measure healthrelated quality of life in scoliosis patients. Patients with low health literacy may need specific guidance when providing feedback on the SRS30 so that reliable and valid results are collected for clinical decision making. The purpose of this research study was to investigate the health literacy demands of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire (SRS30) and to determine if health literacy best practices mitigate errors for patients with low health literacy. Readability assessment, focus groups and structured interviews were used. Results indicated that patients with low health literacy perceived health literacy best practices as helpful in completing the SRS30 drawing. Additionally, patients with inadequate health literacy had a higher proportion of errors in pain location on the drawing (p = 0.0325) compared to patients with adequate health literacy. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(1):3942, 2020).
