Whole-Body versus Routine Skull Base to Mid-thigh 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography in Patients with Malignant Melanoma.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to assess the utility of whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) (skull vertex to toes) imaging relative to the standard field of view (skull base to mid-thigh) in patients with primary melanoma site that is not located in the lower extremities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The primary site of the melanoma and metastatic disease was determined based on 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in 26 patients. The FDG avid sites were tabulated as the primary site, lower extremity, brain, and other sites. The hypothesis is that routine skull base to mid-thigh versus whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with malignant melanoma will not change management. RESULTS: Patients (26) were divided into those with primary melanoma site in either the lower extremities (six patients) or other site (20 patients). Four of the six patients with the primary site in the lower extremities also had positive findings in the ipsilateral inguinal lymph nodes. One of the patients with a positive inguinal lymph node had metastatic sites in the external iliac region and lungs on the initial study. On follow-up imaging, this patient also exhibited diffuse metastatic disease, including a lower extremity. None of the remaining patients in this group had positive findings other than the primary site in the lower extremity. Of the remaining 20 patients with the primary site not in the lower extremity, one had diffuse metastatic disease that included a lower extremity. However, lower extremity involvement would not change patient management in this case. A second patient in this group had diffuse metastatic disease that also involved the brain. However, no metastatic disease was present in the lower extremities in this patient. None of the remaining 18 patients in this group had metastatic disease in a lower extremity. Two patients in the entire study group of 26 had brain metastasis on contrast-enhanced head CT, with one having multiple brain metastasis. PET failed to demonstrate some of the brain lesions. In the other patient with solitary brain metastasis detected on contrast-enhanced head CT, PET was negative. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of the lower extremity may not be justified if the primary neoplasm is not located in the lower extremities. Elimination of lower extremity imaging will reduce scanning time and additional radiation exposure. Similarly, PET/CT imaging of the brain may not be justified if contrast-enhanced CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the head is already obtained since these are more sensitive.

Importance of baseline PET/CT imaging on radiation field design and relapse rates in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the impact of pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans on involved site radiation therapy (ISRT) field design and pattern of relapse among patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-seven patients with stage I or II HL who received first-line chemotherapy followed by consolidative ISRT to all initial sites of disease were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved outcomes-tracking protocol between January 2009 and December 2014. Patients underwent standard-of-care follow-up. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis and cohort comparisons using a χ2 test. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients underwent (PET/CT) scans before chemotherapy and 6 did not because of a lack of insurance (n = 2), inpatient chemotherapy administration (n = 2), scheduling conflicts (n = 1), and unknown reasons (n = 1). The median follow-up was 46 months, and the 4-year RFS rate was 92%. Patients without pretreatment PET imaging were more likely to experience disease relapse (4-year RFS, 97% vs. 67%; P = .001). Among the 6 patients who did not receive a baseline PET/CT scan, all 3 recurrences occurred in lymph node regions outside of, but immediately adjacent to, the radiation field. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage I/II HL who receive ISRT without pretreatment PET/CT scans appear to have an increased risk for relapse in adjacent nodal stations just outside the radiation field. A larger cohort with a longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

A Phase 2 Trial of Concurrent Chemotherapy and Proton Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results and Reflections Following Early Closure of a Single-Institution Study.

PURPOSE: Proton therapy has been shown to reduce radiation dose to organs at risk (OAR) and could be used to safely escalate the radiation dose. We analyzed outcomes in a group of phase 2 study patients treated with dose-escalated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage 3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2009 through 2013, LU02, a phase 2 trial of proton therapy delivering 74 to 80 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction with concurrent chemotherapy for stage 3 NSCLC, was opened to accrual at our institution. Due to slow accrual and competing trials, the study was closed after just 14 patients (stage IIIA, 9 patients; stage IIIB, 5 patients) were accrued over 4 years. During that same time period, 55 additional stage III patients were treated with high-dose proton therapy, including 7 in multi-institutional proton clinical trials, 4 not enrolled due to physician preference, and 44 who were ineligible based on strict entry criteria. An unknown number of patients were ineligible for enrollment due to insurance coverage issues and thus were treated with photon radiation. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 52 months. RESULTS: Two-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 57% and 25%, respectively. Median lengths of overall survival and progression-free survival were 33 months and 14 months, respectively. There were no acute grade 3 toxicities related to proton therapy. Late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary toxicity each occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-escalated proton therapy with concurrent chemotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging results among a small cohort of patients. Unfortunately, single-institution proton studies may be difficult to accrue and consideration for pragmatic and/or multicenter trial design should be considered when developing future proton clinical trials.

Unexpected Bone Metastases from Thyroid Cancer.

Objective. To present a complicated case of differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with metastases to the skull that was evident on I-131 whole body scan (WBS) but negative on other imaging modalities in a low risk patient. Methods. We will discuss clinical course, imaging, pathological findings, and treatment of the patient with skull metastasis from DTC. Pertinent literature on imaging and pathology findings as well as radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment impact on quality of life and survival in patients with bone metastases from DTC will be reviewed. Results. The patient is a 37-year-old woman with a diagnosis of DTC who had focal areas of increased uptake in the head on WBS with no correlative findings on CT and MRI. Initially, false positive findings were suspected since patient had a low risk for developing metastases. However, the persistent findings on post-RAI treatment WBS, following two courses of treatment, were highly concerning for metastatic bone disease. WBC performed 6 months following the second RAI treatment revealed resolution of the findings. Conclusions. False positive findings in WBS are frequent and may be due to contamination, perspiration, or folliculitis of the scalp as well as benign lesions such as meningioma, hematoma, cavernous angioma, and metallic sutures. However, metastatic disease should always be considered even if the patient has low risk of distant metastatic disease and correlative images do not support the diagnosis. RAI therapy appears to improve the survival rates and quality of life of thyroid cancer patients with bone metastases based on retrospective studies.

Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta as a cause of positive FDG PET/CT.

Type A acute intramural hematoma (IMH) of the ascending aorta is defined as hemorrhage in the aortic wall in the absence of intimal disruption. Proximity to the adventitia may explain the higher incidence of rupture in IMH. We present a case of IMH, diagnosed by the presence of linear intense uptake of FDG on PET/CT, in a 70-year-old woman undergoing staging for colorectal cancer. There is no current role for FDG-PET in the diagnosis of IMH. This case demonstrates that incidental focal FDG activity in the wall of the aorta may indicate the life-threatening diagnosis of IMH.

18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer.

UNLABELLED: PET using 18F-FDG has been shown to effectively detect various types of cancer by their increased glucose metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of coregistered PET and CT (PET/CT) in patients with suspected thyroid cancer recurrence. METHODS: After total thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine ablation, 61 consecutive patients with elevated thyroglobulin levels or a clinical suspicion of recurrent disease underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. Of these, 59 patients had negative findings on radioiodine (131I) whole-body scintigraphy (WBS). Fifty-three of the 61 patients had both negative 131I WBS findings and elevated thyroglobulin levels. PET/CT images were acquired 60 min after intravenous injection of 400-610 MBq of 18F-FDG using a combined PET/CT scanner. Any increased 18F-FDG uptake was compared with the coregistered CT image to differentiate physiologic from pathologic tracer uptake. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were correlated with the findings of histology, postradioiodine WBS, ultrasound, or clinical follow-up serving as a reference. The diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated for the entire patient group and for those patients with serum thyroglobulin levels of less than 5, 5-10, and more than 10 ng/mL. RESULTS: Thirty patients had positive findings on 18F-FDG PET/CT; 26 were true-positive and 4 were false-positive. In 2 patients, increased 18F-FDG uptake identified a second primary malignancy. 18F-FDG PET/CT results were true-negative in 19 patients and false-negative in 12 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT were 68.4%, 82.4%, and 73.8%, respectively. The sensitivities of 18F-FDG PET/CT at serum thyroglobulin levels of less than 5, 5-10, and more than 10 ng/mL were 60%, 63%, and 72%, respectively. Clinical management changed for 27 (44%) of 61 patients, including surgery, radiation therapy, or chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Coregistered 18F-FDG PET/CT can provide precise anatomic localization of recurrent or metastatic thyroid carcinoma, leading to improved diagnostic accuracy, and can guide therapeutic management. In addition, the findings of this study suggest that further assessment of 131I WBS-negative, thyroglobulin-positive patients by 18F-FDG PET/CT may aid in the clinical management of selected cases regardless of the thyroglobulin level.

PET/CT Protocols and Artifacts in the Head and Neck.

Combined PET/CT has been in existence clinically for nearly 7 years since development and initial evaluation from 1998 to 2001. Combined PET/CT offers advantages over PET and CT acquired on separate devices, including consolidation of imaging studies, more accurate data coregistration, improved lesion localization, and benefits related to radiation therapy planning. This article discusses CT and PET protocols pertinent to PET/CT imaging in patients who have head and neck cancer, including a discussion of how the CT portion of a PET/CT scan can be performed and a description of common PET/CT artifacts that may be encountered secondary to CT protocols.

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: protocol issues and options.

Combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) became FDA-approved for clinical use in late 2001. There are several design advantages of combined PET/CT over PET and CT acquired on separate devices, including more accurate CT and PET data co-registration, improved lesion localization, consolidation of imaging studies, and reduced scan times compared to dedicated PET. There are several protocols that can used to scan patients on combined PET/CT devices. Although there is no single "correct" protocol for performing a PET/CT scan, the use of oral and intravenous contrast media may improve the diagnostic value of the CT component. Whether to utilize contrast media depends on important clinical variables, including the specific type of tumor and the likelihood of encountering viable abdominal and pelvic malignancy. This article discusses various protocols pertinent to PET/CT imaging, including how the CT portion of a PET/CT scan can be performed and optimized, as well as PET/CT interpretation and reporting issues.