RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns. METHODS: A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis , Reoperación , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/tendencias , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/tendencias , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/prevención & control , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/tendencias , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: First metatarsophalangeal joint sprains or turf toe (TT) injuries occur secondary to forceful hyperextension of the great toe. TT injuries are common among athletes, especially those participating in football, soccer, basketball, dancing, and wrestling. This review summarizes the current treatment modalities, rehabilitation protocols, and return-to-play criteria, as well as performance outcomes of patients who have sustained TT injuries. RECENT FINDINGS: Less than 2% of TT injuries require surgery, but those that do are typically grade III injuries with damage to the MTP joint, evidence of bony injury, or severe instability. Rehabilitation protocols following non-operative management consist of 3 phases lasting up to 10 weeks, whereas protocols following operative management consist of 4 phases lasting up 20 weeks. Athletes with low-grade injuries typically achieve their prior level of performance. However, among athletes with higher grade injuries, treated both non-operatively and operatively, about 70% are expected to maintain their level of performance. The treatment protocol, return-to-play criteria, and overall performance outcomes for TT injuries depend on the severity and classification of the initial sprain. For grade I injuries, players may return to play once they experience minimal to no pain with normal weightbearing, traditionally after 3-5 days. For grade II injuries, or partial tears, players typically lose 2-4 weeks of play and may need additional support with taping when returning to play. For grade III injuries, or complete disruption of the plantar plate, athletes lose 4-6 weeks or more depending upon treatment strategy.
RESUMEN
â¤: The primary means of femoral fixation in North America is cementless, and its use is increasing worldwide, despite registry data and recent studies showing a higher risk of periprosthetic fracture and early revision in elderly patients managed with such fixation than in those who have cemented femoral fixation. â¤: Cemented femoral stems have excellent long-term outcomes and a continued role, particularly in elderly patients. â¤: Contrary to historical concerns, recent studies have not shown an increased risk of death with cemented femoral fixation. â¤: The choice of femoral fixation method should be determined by the patient's age, comorbidities, and bone quality. â¤: We recommend considering cemented femoral fixation in patients who are >70 years old (particularly women), in those with Dorr type-C bone or a history of osteoporosis or fragility fractures, or when intraoperative broach stability cannot be obtained.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Prótesis de Cadera , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Cementos para Huesos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Humanos , Reoperación , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in outcomes after orthopaedic surgery have been well-documented in the fields of arthroplasty, trauma, and spine surgery; however, little research has assessed differences in outcomes after surgery for oncologic musculoskeletal disease. If racial disparities exist in the treatment of patients with pathologic long bone fractures, then they should be identified and addressed to promote equity in patient care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How do wait times between hospital admission and operative fixation for pathologic fractures of long bones differ between Black and non-Hispanic white patients, after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching? (2) How does the proportion of patients with 30-day postoperative complication differ between these groups after controlling for confounding variables using propensity score matching? METHODS: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 828 patients who underwent fixation for pathologic fractures from 2012 to 2018. This database not only provides a large enough sample of pathologic long bone fracture patients to conduct the present study, but also it contains variables such as time from hospitalization to surgery that other national databases do not. After excluding patients with incomplete data (4% of the initial cohort), 775 patients were grouped by self-reported race as Black (12% [94]) or white (88% [681]). Propensity score matching using a 1:1 nearest-neighbor match was then used to match 94 Black patients with 94 white patients according to age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, anemia, endstage renal disease, independence in performing activities of daily living, congestive heart failure, and pulmonary disease. The primary outcome of interest was the number of days between hospital admission and operative fixation, which we assessed using a Poisson regression and report as an incidence risk ratio. The secondary outcomes were the occurrences of major 30-day postoperative adverse events (failure to wean off mechanical ventilation, cerebrovascular events, renal failure, cardiovascular events, reoperation, death), minor 30-day adverse events (reintubation, wound complications, pneumonia, and thromboembolic events), and any 30-day adverse events (defined as the pooling of all adverse events, including readmissions). These outcomes were analyzed using a bivariate analysis and logistic regression with robust estimates of variance and are reported as odds ratios. Because any results on disparities rely on rigorous control of other baseline demographics, we performed this multivariable approach to ensure we were controlling for confounding variables as much as possible. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as age and gender, we found that Black patients had a longer mean wait time (incidence risk ratio 1.5 [95% CI 1.1 to 2.1]; p = 0.01) than white patients. After controlling for confounding variables, Black patients also had greater odds of having any postoperative adverse event (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.8]; p = 0.02), including readmission (OR 3.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.6]; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: The racial disparities in pathologic long bone fracture care found in our study may be attributed to fundamental racial biases, as well as systemic socioeconomic disparities in the US healthcare system. Identifying and eliminating the racial, socioeconomic, and sociocultural biases that drive these disparities would improve care for patients with orthopaedic oncologic conditions. One possible way to reduce these disparities would be to implement standardized surgical care pathways for pathological long bone fractures across different institutions to minimize variation in important aspects of care, such as time to surgical fixation. Further insight is needed on the types of standardized care pathways and the implementation mechanisms that are most effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas Espontáneas/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Musculoskeletal education is underrepresented in American medical school curricula, and many medical schools have recently shifted toward a condensed preclinical period. Given that musculoskeletal diseases represent a large and growing social and economic burden, it is imperative that medical students be properly prepared to care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, regardless of intended specialty. METHODS: A survey was sent to all medical students enrolled full-time at our institution during the 2018 to 2019 academic year. First year students had not yet received musculoskeletal instruction, second-year students had completed a shortened musculoskeletal curriculum of 49 total hours, and third- and fourth-year respondents had completed a longer 78 hour musculoskeletal curriculum. Respondents were asked to rank their confidence in their musculoskeletal knowledge, their interest in orthopaedics, followed by the well-validated Freedman and Bernstein musculoskeletal knowledge assessment and a demographics section asking had respondents completed an orthopaedic surgery clinical rotation, if they had other clinical orthopaedic experience, class year, intended clinical specialty, and gender. RESULTS: There were 179 responses to the survey, comprising 53 first-year, 54 second-year, and 72 third- and fourth-year students. The longer musculoskeletal curriculum was associated with significantly improved performance compared to the shorter musculoskeletal curriculum (p < 0.0001). Completion of a clinical orthopedics rotation was associated with significantly improved performance than not completing a rotation (p < 0.001), regardless of if non-rotators had other orthopedic experience (pâ¯=â¯0.001) or if they did not (p < 0.001). There was no difference in score (pâ¯=â¯0.94) or musculoskeletal knowledge confidence (pâ¯=â¯0.09) between males and females. Intending to pursue orthopedics was associated with significantly higher scores (p < 0.001) and significantly higher confidence (pâ¯=â¯0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As shortening preclinical musculoskeletal curricula worsens musculoskeletal performance, medical schools should consider requiring orthopedic clinical rotations to maintain musculoskeletal competency of graduates.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Facultades de Medicina , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Preoperative skin preparation with antimicrobial agents decreases the risk of surgical site infection, but concerns have been raised about the visibility of a common surgical preparatory agent (ChloraPrep; Becton, Dickinson & Co, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey), depending on skin pigmentation. Poor visibility may lead to failure to identify inadequately prepared skin, increasing the risk of surgical site infection. This study was conducted to determine whether different tints of ChloraPrep and different skin pigmentations affect the ability of orthopedic surgeons to identify the adequacy of skin preparation. The forearms of volunteers in 4 skin pigmentation categories (fair, medium-fair, medium-dark, and dark) were prepared with Hi-Lite Orange and Scrub Teal ChloraPrep, with 1 forearm prepared adequately and 1 prepared inadequately. Videos showing the forearms were obtained and compiled into a survey that was sent to orthopedic surgeons, who were asked to assess the adequacy of skin preparation. When the 4 pigmentation categories were aggregated, no difference was noted between Hi-Lite Orange and Scrub Teal tints in rates of correct identification of adequate skin preparation by respondents. When the preparation tint was not controlled for, respondents correctly identified the adequacy of skin preparation for fair and medium-fair pigmentations, but not for medium-dark and dark skin pigmentations. The Hi-Lite Orange tint was significantly easier to identify on fair and medium-fair skin pigmentations, and the Scrub Teal tint was easier to identify on medium-dark and dark skin pigmentations. To reduce the risk of surgical site infection, surgeons should use Hi-Lite Orange on patients whose skin is fair or medium-fair and Scrub Teal on patients whose skin is medium-dark or dark. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1):e44-e48.].