RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercial delivery cyclists represent a uniquely vulnerable and poorly understood road user. The primary aim of this study was to pilot whether cycling injuries could be categorised as either commercial or non-commercial using documentation entered into routine hospital medical records, in order to determine the feasibility of conducting a large cohort study of commercial cycling injuries in the future. A secondary aim was to determine which key demographic, incident and injury characteristics were associated with commercial versus non-commercial cycling injuries in emergency. METHODS: Pilot retrospective cohort study of adults presenting to an acute public hospital emergency department between May 2019 and April 2020 after sustaining a cycling-related injury. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the demographic, incident and injury characteristics associated with commercial compared to non-commercial cycling. RESULTS: Of the 368 people presenting to the emergency department with a cycling-related injury, we were able to categorise 43 (11.7%) as commercial delivery cyclists, 153 (41.6%) as non-commercial cyclists and the working status of 172 (46.7%) was unable to be confirmed. Both commercial and unconfirmed cyclists were more likely to be younger than non-commercial cyclists. Compared to non-commercial cyclists, commercial cyclists were 11 times more likely to speak a language other than English (AOR 11.3; 95% CI 4.07-31.30; p<0.001), less likely to be injured from non-collision incidents than vehicle collisions (AOR 0.36; 95% CI 0.15-0.91; p=0.030) and were over 13 times more likely to present to the emergency department between 8.00pm and 12.00am compared to the early morning hours (12.00 to 8.00am) (AOR 13.43; 95% CI 2.20-82.10; p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The growth of commercial cycling, particularly through online food delivery services, has raised concern regarding commercial cyclist safety. Improvements in the recording of cycling injury commercial status is required to enable ongoing surveillance of commercial cyclist injuries and establish the extent and risk factors associated with commercial cycling.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Persistent activity limitations are common among road trauma survivors, yet access to rehabilitation in hospital and in the community remains variable. This study aimed to identify unmet rehabilitation needs following road trauma and assess the feasibility of a novel rehabilitation consultation service delivered via telehealth following hospitalization. METHODS: A pilot cohort study was conducted with survivors of road trauma who were hospitalized but did not receive formal inpatient rehabilitation. All participants received a multidisciplinary rehabilitation consultation via telehealth 1-3 weeks post-discharge, to assess rehabilitation needs and initiate treatment referrals as required. Functional and qualitative outcomes were assessed at baseline (1-7 days); one month and three months post-discharge. RESULTS: 38 participants were enrolled. All (100%) reported functional limitations at baseline; 86.5% were found to have unmet rehabilitation needs, and 75.7% were recommended rehabilitation interventions. Functional ability improved over time, but more than half the cohort continued to report activity limitations (67.6%), pain (64.7%) and/or altered mood (41.2%) for up to three months. Participants found the telehealth service to be acceptable, convenient, and helpful for recovery. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of mild-moderate trauma survivors report unmet rehabilitation needs following hospital discharge. Telehealth appears to be a feasible, convenient and acceptable mode of assessing these needs.Implications for rehabilitationSurvivors of road-related injuries often experience ongoing impairments and activity limitations.Among those who don't receive rehabilitation in hospital, we found a high proportion (86.5%) had unmet rehabilitation needs after discharge.A telehealth rehabilitation service was feasible to deliver and could successfully identify unmet rehabilitation needs.The piloted telehealth intervention was viewed as acceptable, convenient and beneficial by patients.