Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Med ; 135(5): 560-565, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081384

RESUMEN

For the greater part of the 20th century, the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction regarding whether thrombosis was either present or primary was debated until 1973 when pathologists and clinicians met and by consensus, finally decided that the data supported that transmural infarction (what we now refer to as ST elevation myocardial infarction or STEMI) was caused by thrombus in the vessel supplying the infarcted territory. As the data for this consensus came from pathological analysis, it took another 7 years until angiographic and interventional data in humans with acute presentations of transmural infarction convincingly indicated that thrombus was indeed responsible. Subsequently, in patients presenting with either syndromes of unstable angina or nontransmural (later called non-ST elevation) myocardial infarction, it was established through angiographic and other interventional approaches that thrombus formation was also causative in a substantial proportion of these patients. This article reviews the history and this search for causation of myocardial infarction that now has resulted in present therapies that have saved innumerable lives over the last 30 to 40 years.


Asunto(s)
Trombosis Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Angina Inestable , Angiografía Coronaria , Trombosis Coronaria/complicaciones , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA