Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 1004169, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36582741

RESUMEN

Background: Ventricular septal flattening reflects RV pressure overload in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eccentricity index (EI) and pulmonary artery distensibility (PAD) correlate with pulmonary artery pressure. We assessed the utility of these using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with chronic thromboembolic disease. This may allow non-invasive differentiation between patients who have chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and those with pulmonary vascular obstructions without PH at rest, known as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD). Methods: Twenty patients without resting pulmonary hypertension, including ten with chronic thromboembolic disease, and thirty patients with CTEPH were identified from a database at the Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit. CMR and right heart catheter had been performed within 96 h of each other. Short-axis views at the level of papillary muscles were used to assess the EI at end-systole and diastole. Pulmonary artery distensibility was calculated using velocity-encoded images attained perpendicular to the main trunk. Results: Eccentricity index at end-systole and end-diastole were higher in CTEPH compared to controls (1.3 ± 0.5 vs. 1.0 ± 0.01; p ≤ 0.01 and (1.22 ± 0.2 vs. 0.98 ± 0.01; p ≤ 0.01, respectively) and compared to those with CTED. PAD was significantly lower in CTEPH compared to controls (0.13 ± 0.1 vs. 0.46 ± 0.23; p ≤ 0.01) and compared to CTED. End-systolic EI and end-diastolic EI correlated with pulmonary vascular hemodynamic indices and exercise variables, including mean pulmonary arterial pressure (R0.74 and 0.75, respectively), cardiac output (R-value -0.4 and -0.4, respectively) NTproBNP (R-value 0.3 and 0.3, respectively) and 6-min walk distance (R-value -0.7 and -0.8 respectively). Pulmonary artery distensibility also correlated with 6-min walk distance (R-value 0.8). Conclusion: Eccentricity index and pulmonary artery distensibility can detect the presence of pulmonary hypertension in chronic thromboembolic disease and differentiate between CTEPH and CTED subgroups. These measures support the use of non-invasive tests including CMR for the detection pulmonary hypertension and may reduce the requirement for right heart catheterization.

2.
Open Heart ; 9(1)2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35477699

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Group II pulmonary hypertension (PH) can be challenging to distinguish from Group I PH without proceeding to right heart catheterisation (RHC). The diagnostic accuracy of the H2FPEF and OPTICS scores was investigated in Scotland. METHODS: Patients were included in the study if they were referred to the Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit between 2016 and 2020 and subsequently diagnosed with Group II PH or Group I PH which was either idiopathic, heritable or pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. The established cut offs for the H2FPEF and for the OPTICS scores were applied retrospectively to predict the presence of Group II PH. The diagnosis from the scores were compared with the MDT consensus diagnosis following RHC. RESULTS: 107 patients with Group I PH and 86 patients with Group II PH were included. Retrospective application of the OPTICS score demonstrated that pretest scoring would detect 28% of cases with Group II PH yet at the cost of misdiagnosing 4% of patients with Group I as Group II PH (specificity 0.96). The H2FPEF score had a far greater sensitivity (0.70) yet reduced specificity (0.91), leading to misdiagnosis of 9% of Group I PH cases. CONCLUSION: While the specificity of these scores was high, the lack of perfect specificity limits their utility as it results in missed patients with Group I PH. As a consequence, they cannot replace RHC as the means of diagnosing the aetiology of PH in their current form. The scores may still be used to support clinical judgement or to indicate the advisability for further provocative testing at RHC.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión Pulmonar , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Humanos , Hipertensión Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia
3.
BMJ Open ; 11(8): e050281, 2021 08 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34462282

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess for increase in pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, in both critical care and ward environments. SETTING: We reviewed all CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) performed in Scotland between 23 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 and identified those with COVID-19 using either classical radiological appearances or positive COVID-19 PCR swab. PARTICIPANTS: All hospitalised patients in Scotland with COVID-19 between 23 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 who underwent a CTPA. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: To assess if the rate of PTE was increased in those with COVID-19 compared with previously published figures of hospitalised patients. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: To assess the effect of right heart strain or requirement for critical care on mortality. RESULTS: 3401 CTPAs were reviewed. 192 were positive for PTE in patients with evidence of COVID-19 either real-time PCR swab positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n=104) or having radiological changes consistent with COVID-19 (n=88). The total number of hospital admissions in Scotland between 23rd March 2020 and 31st May 2020 with COVID-19 was 5195. The incidence of PTE during this time was 3.7% in all patients admitted to all hospitals in Scotland with COVID-19 during this period. 475 hospitalised patients were managed in critical care (both level 2 and level 3 care), in whom the incidence of PTE was 6% (n=29). 4720 patients did not require admission to critical care, in whom the incidence of PTE was 3.5% (n=163). There was increased risk of death with right heart strain (25/52 vs 128/140 (p<0.01)) and in critical care (15/29 vs 146/163 (p<0.01)). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated an increased risk of PTE in critical care and ward-based environments. Further studies are required to establish effective prophylactic anticoagulation in this group.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Cuidados Críticos , Hospitales , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
ERJ Open Res ; 6(4)2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33263038

RESUMEN

Socioeconomic factors have been shown to have an adverse impact on survival in some respiratory diseases. Studies from the USA and China have suggested worse survival in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension in low socioeconomic groups. We looked at the effect of deprivation on the outcomes in patients with connective tissue disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (CTDPH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in a retrospective observational study. Data were obtained from 232 patients with CTDPH and 263 with CTEPH who were under the care of the Scottish Pulmonary Vascular Unit, Glasgow, UK. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to assess for a relationship between deprivation and survival. We found no difference in survival across deprivation quintiles in the CTDPH (p=0.26) or CTEPH cohorts (p=0.18). We constructed multivariate models using enrolment time, age, sex and body mass index, with no significant change in findings. There was no difference between expected and observed population distribution of CTDPH (p=0.98) and CTEPH (p=0.36). Whilst there was no difference in presenting functional class in the CTDPH group, the CTEPH patients in more deprived quintiles presented in a worse functional class (p=0.032). There was no difference between quintiles of CTEPH patients who had distal or proximal disease (p=0.75), or who underwent surgery (p=0.5). Increased social deprivation is not associated with worse survival in patients with CTDPH and CTEPH managed in the Scottish National Health Service. Whilst there is no evidence of referral barriers in CTDPH, this may not be the case in CTEPH, as lower deprivation was associated with worse functional class at presentation.

5.
Glob Cardiol Sci Pract ; 2020(1): e202006, 2020 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33150151
6.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 5(1): e000240, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29468073

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Accurate prognostication is difficult in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We developed a set of robust computational models to quantify the prognostic value of routinely available clinical data, which form the basis of published MPM prognostic models. METHODS: Data regarding 269 patients with MPM were allocated to balanced training (n=169) and validation sets (n=100). Prognostic signatures (minimal length best performing multivariate trained models) were generated by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression for overall survival (OS), OS <6 months and OS <12 months. OS prediction was quantified using Somers DXY statistic, which varies from 0 to 1, with increasing concordance between observed and predicted outcomes. 6-month survival and 12-month survival were described by area under the curve (AUC) scores. RESULTS: Median OS was 270 (IQR 140-450) days. The primary OS model assigned high weights to four predictors: age, performance status, white cell count and serum albumin, and after cross-validation performed significantly better than would be expected by chance (mean DXY0.332 (±0.019)). However, validation set DXY was only 0.221 (0.0935-0.346), equating to a 22% improvement in survival prediction than would be expected by chance. The 6-month and 12-month OS signatures included the same four predictors, in addition to epithelioid histology plus platelets and epithelioid histology plus C-reactive protein (mean AUC 0.758 (±0.022) and 0.737 (±0.012), respectively). The <6-month OS model demonstrated 74% sensitivity and 68% specificity. The <12-month OS model demonstrated 63% sensitivity and 79% specificity. Model content and performance were generally comparable with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic value of the basic clinical information contained in these, and previously published models, is fundamentally of limited value in accurately predicting MPM prognosis. The methods described are suitable for expansion using emerging predictors, including tumour genomics and volumetric staging.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...