RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Since 2013, badger culling has been part of the UK Government's strategy for controlling bovine tuberculosis (bTB) within a high-risk area (HRA) in England. Government surveillance data now enables an examination of bTB herd incidence and prevalence, its headline indicators, within and outside cull areas over the period 2009-2020. METHODS: Analysis compared herd incidence and prevalence data from within and outside badger culling areas. A range of models (GLMs, GLMMs, GAMs and GAMMs) were used to analyse incidence and prevalence in culled and unculled areas using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Change in incidence across ten county areas within the HRA for the period 2010-2020 was also compared. RESULTS: Analyses based on Defra published data using a variety of statistical methodologies did not suggest that badger culling affected herd bTB incidence or prevalence over the study period. In 9 of 10 counties, bTB incidence peaked and began to fall before badger culling commenced. LIMITATIONS: There are limitations around the data available on culling location, temporal information and other confounding factors. As such, further analysis of any future datasets that may be released on bTB levels in areas where badger culling has been implemented is warranted. CONCLUSION: This examination of government data obtained over a wide area and a long time period failed to identify a meaningful effect of badger culling on bTB in English cattle herds. These findings may have implications for the use of badger culling in current and future bTB control policy.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Bovinos , Mustelidae , Tuberculosis Bovina , Animales , Teorema de Bayes , Bovinos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Incidencia , Tuberculosis Bovina/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Bovina/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Iain McGill and Mark Jones argue that recent data released by the APHA show that it is the prevalence or 'infectivity' of cattle that is sustaining bTB infection and driving transmission of Mycobacterium bovis to new herds.
Asunto(s)
Epidemias/veterinaria , Mycobacterium bovis , Tuberculosis Bovina/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Bovina/transmisión , Animales , Bovinos , Agencias Gubernamentales , Prevalencia , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Sacrificio de Animales/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mustelidae , Política Pública , Tuberculosis Bovina/prevención & control , Sacrificio de Animales/métodos , Sacrificio de Animales/estadística & datos numéricos , Bienestar del Animal/normas , Animales , Bovinos , Humanos , Concesión de Licencias , Reino Unido , Medicina Veterinaria/organización & administraciónAsunto(s)
Mycobacterium bovis , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Animales , Tuberculosis , Tuberculosis BovinaRESUMEN
In Europe, the name "Clar" immediately evokes to any otorhinolaryngologist the classic head mirror that remains a symbol of our profession. Yet, the origin of Clar has never been investigated. In this clinical and historical review, based on an Internet and PubMed database search together with perusal of Fischer's Biographical Lexikon, the authors seek to elucidate this medical enigma. The data presented suggest that Clar was not a physician but rather a term picked by the company that designed the mirror by the end of the 19th century to underscore the bright and sharp view provided by this then innovative medical device. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 930-932, 2016.
