A Gravid Situation: General Surgery Faculty Support for Pregnant Surgical Residents.

INTRODUCTION: The perceptions of teaching faculty toward pregnant general surgery residents have been overlooked despite the daily interactions amongst these groups. METHODS: A 32-question survey designed to measure general surgery teaching faculty perceptions toward pregnant residents was distributed electronically from March 2022 to April 2022 to general surgery teaching faculty in the United States. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize responses and differences in perceptions, and qualitative analysis identified recurring themes from free-text responses. RESULTS: Among 163 respondents included in the final analysis, 58.5% were male and 41.5% were female. Despite 99.4% of surgeons feeling comfortable if a resident told them they were pregnant, 22.4% of surgeons disagreed that their institutions have supportive cultures toward pregnancy. Almost half (45.4%) have witnessed negative comments about pregnant residents and half (50.3%) believe that pregnant surgical residents are discriminated against by their coresidents. Nearly two-thirds of surgeons (64.8%) believe that someone should have a child whenever they wish during training. Given recent reports, 80.2% of surgeons recognized that female surgeons have increased risks of infertility and pregnancy complications. Recurring themes of normalizing pregnancy, improving policies, and creating a culture change were expressed. CONCLUSIONS: In this national survey, although there appears to be positive perceptions of pregnancy in surgical training amongst those surveyed, there is acknowledged necessity of further normalizing pregnancy and improving policies to better support pregnant residents. These data provide further evidence that though perceptions may be improving, changes are still needed to better support pregnancy during training.

Clinical Longevity of Preoperative Injection of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Delayed Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

Diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents about 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancers. There is debate about the benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for further staging and guidance of therapy in patients with DCIS. Current guidelines recommend SLNB for patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for DCIS. Utilizing superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles as a tracer may allow for a delayed SLNB (d-SLNB), typically within a month of injection. We present our experience with a patient who due to complications from surgery could not complete her d-SLNB for 165 days. The SPIO tracer remained active in the lymph node and remained clinically useful for this five and a half month gap from time of injection. Further study is needed to determine the clinical longevity of SPIO in a lymph node.

Concordant care in sentinel lymph node omission following Choosing Wisely® recommendations at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the SSO and ABIM released a Choosing Wisely® guideline stating SLNB can be safely omitted in women ≥70 with HR â€‹+ â€‹HER-invasive breast cancer. No study evaluating concordance of care with this guideline has been performed within a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: From 2005 to 2020, there were 382 patients with cT1-2N0 invasive carcinoma ER+/PR+ and HER2-identified as having undergone SLNB. These patients were then separated into two groups; those in the pre-guideline concordance cohort (2005-2015) and those in the post-guideline concordance (2016-2020) cohort. Axillary management concordance was trended over time. RESULTS: 382 patients from 2005 to 2020 with HR â€‹+ â€‹HER- IBC were identified. No difference was seen in SLNB pre-versus post-guidelines (p â€‹= â€‹0.35). Increased concordance was noted as age increased (p â€‹= â€‹0.0068) and adjuvant radiation therapy exclusion (p â€‹< â€‹0.0001) post-guideline release. Concordance improved over the years post-guideline release (R2 â€‹= â€‹0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical guideline adoption occurs over time but may also be affected by outside decisions and factors. Further study into patterns of guideline adoption may facilitate improving adherence to guidelines.

Luminal A Versus B After Choosing Wisely: Does Lymph Node Surgery Affect Oncologic Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Choosing Wisely campaign recommended against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in women ≥ 70 years old diagnosed with early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. No distinction is made between luminal A and luminal B phenotypes, despite luminal B being considered more aggressive. This study evaluates the effect of SLNB on oncologic outcomes in HER2- luminal B versus luminal A breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed an IRB-approved, single institution, retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020 of women aged ≥ 70 years with clinically node negative, HR+ breast cancer undergoing definitive surgical treatment. Luminal status was defined by gene expression panel testing, Ki67%, and/or pathologic grading. Primary endpoints included locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: SLNB did not correlate with significant differences in LRR in luminal A (p = 0.92) or luminal B (p = 0.96) disease. SLNB correlated with improved DFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.001) in luminal A disease, but not in luminal B disease (DFS p = 0.73; OS p = 0.36). On multivariate analysis, age (HR = 1.17; p < 0.01) and tumor size (HR = 1.03; p < 0.05) were associated with DFS, while SLNB was not (p = 0.71). Luminal status (HR = 0.52, p < 0.05), age (HR = 1.15, p < 0.01), and comorbidities (HR = 1.35, p < 0.05) were associated with OS, but not SLNB (p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SLNB may be safely omitted in patients aged ≥ 70 years with luminal B disease given similar LRR in luminal A disease. Our findings suggest that DFS and OS are driven by tumor biology, patient age, and comorbidities rather than receipt of SLNB.

Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision-Making: The Partners' Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The rate of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) continues to rise despite no improvement in survival, an increased risk of surgical complications, and negative effects on quality of life. This study explored the experiences of the partners of women who undergo CPM. METHODS: This study was part of an investigation into the factors motivating women with early-stage unilateral breast cancer and low genetic risk to opt for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Participating women were asked for permission to invite their partners to take part in interviews. In-depth interviews with partners were conducted using a semi-structured topic guide. A thematic analysis of the data was performed RESULTS: Of 35 partners, all men, 15 agreed to be interviewed. Most perceived their role to be strong and logical. Some hoped their wives would choose a bilateral mastectomy. All felt strongly that the final decision was up to their partners. The partners often framed the decision for CPM as one of life or death. Thus, any aesthetic effects were unimportant by comparison. The male partners had difficulty grasping the physical and emotional changes inherent in mastectomy, which made communicating about sexuality and intimacy very challenging for the couples. In the early recovery period, some noted the stress of managing home life. CONCLUSIONS: The experiences of the male partners provide insight into how couples navigate complex treatment decision-making, both together and separately. There may be a benefit to including partners in pre- and post-surgical counseling to mitigate miscommunication regarding the expected oncologic and emotional outcomes related to CPM.

General Surgery Faculty Knowledge and Perceptions of Breast Pumping Amongst Postpartum Surgical Residents.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data regarding the knowledge and perceptions teaching faculty possess about breast pumping among general surgery residents despite breast pumping becoming more common during training. This study aimed to examine faculty knowledge and perceptions of breast pumping amongst general surgery residents. METHODS: A 29-question survey measuring knowledge and perceptions about breast pumping was administered online to United States teaching faculty from March-April 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize responses, Fisher's exact test was used to report differences in responses by surgeon sex and age, and qualitative analysis identified recurrent themes. RESULTS: 156 responses were analyzed; 58.6% were male and 41.4% were female, and the majority (63.5%) were less than 50 years old. Nearly all (97.7%) women with children breast pumped, while 75.3% of men with children had partners who pumped. Men more often than women indicated "I don't know" when asked about frequency (24.7 vs. 7.9%, p = 0.041) and duration (25.0 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.007) of pumping. Nearly all surgeons are comfortable (97.4%) discussing lactation needs and support (98.1%) breast pumping, yet only two-thirds feel their institutions are supportive. Almost half (41.0%) of surgeons agreed that breast pumping does not impact operating room workflow. Recurring themes included normalizing breast pumping, creating change to better support residents, and communicating needs between all parties. CONCLUSIONS: Teaching faculty may have supportive perceptions about breast pumping, but knowledge gaps may hinder greater levels of support. Opportunities exist for increased faculty education, communication, and policies to better support breast pumping residents.