Optimal reconstructive strategies in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy - A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A third of breast cancer patients require mastectomy. In some high-risk cases postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is indicated, threatening reconstructive complications. Several PMRT and reconstruction combinations are used. Autologous flap (AF) reconstruction may be immediate (AF→PMRT), delayed-immediate with tissue expander (TE [TE→PMRT→AF]) or delayed (PMRT→AF). Implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) includes immediate TE followed by PMRT and conversion to permanent implant (PI [TE→PMRT→PI]), delayed TE insertion (PMRT→TE→PI), and prosthetic implant conversion prior to PMRT (TE→PI→PMRT). AIM: Perform a network metanalysis (NMA) assessing optimal sequencing of PMRT and reconstructive type. METHODS: A systematic review and NMA was performed according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines. NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta and Shiny. RESULTS: 16 studies from 4182 identified, involving 2322 reconstructions over three decades, met predefined inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrated moderate heterogeneity. Multiple comparisons combining direct and indirect evidence established AF-PMRT as the optimal approach to avoid reconstructive failure, compared with IBBR strategies (versus PMRT→TE→PI; OR [odds ratio] 0.10, CrI [95% credible interval] 0.02 to 0.55; versus TE→PMRT→PI; OR 0.13, CrI 0.02 to 0.75; versus TE→PI→PMRT OR 0.24, CrI 0.05 to 1.05). PMRT→AF best avoided infection, demonstrating significant improvement versus PMRT→TE→PI alone (OR 0.12, CrI 0.02 to 0.88). Subgroup analysis of IBBR found TE→PI→PMRT reduced failure rates (OR 0.35, CrI 0.15-0.81) compared to other IBBR strategies but increased capsular contracture. CONCLUSION: Immediate AF reconstruction is associated with reduced failure in the setting of PMRT. However, optimal reconstructive strategy depends on patient, surgeon and institutional factors. If IBBR is chosen, complication rates decrease if performed prior to PMRT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD 42020157077.

Referral of patients to plastic surgeons following self-harm: Opportunities for suicide prevention.

Self-harm is a common source of referral to plastic and hand surgery services. Appropriate management of these patients is complex and includes the need for close liaison with mental health services. Self-harm is the single biggest risk factor for completed suicide, thereby increasing the risk by a factor of 66.1 This study aimed to analyse the clinical pathway and demographics of patients referred to plastic surgeons following self-harm. This 6-year retrospective series included patients referred to plastic surgeons following self-harm within the Galway University Hospital group. Patients were identified through the Hospital inpatient enquiry system, cross-referenced with data from the National Suicide Research Foundation. Data collected included demographics, psychiatric history, details of self-harm injury, admission pathway and operative intervention. Forty-nine patients were referred to plastic surgery services during the study period, accounting for 61 individual presentations. The male-to-female ratio was 26 (53%) to 23 (47%). Mean age was 40 years (range 21-95 years). Alcohol or illicit substance use was recorded in 17 of 61 (28%) presentations. Mortality from suicide occurred in 4 patients (8%). Mental health assessment was not carried out in 9 presentations (15%). Documentation of need for close or one-to-one observation was made in 11 cases (20%) and was not referred to in 43 cases (83%) following mental health assessment. This study demonstrates significant diversity in the management of this vulnerable patient group and may inform development of referral pathways to improve the safety of transfer, surgical admission and discharge of patients following self-harm, in consultation with mental health services.

Analysis of sentinel node positivity in primary cutaneous melanoma: an 8-year single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard method for determining the pathologic status of the regional lymph nodes. AIMS: The aim of our study was to determine the incidence and clinicopathologic factors predictive of SLN positivity, and to evaluate the prognostic importance of SLNB in patients with cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent SLNB for primary melanoma at our institution from 2005 to 2012. Statistical analysis was performed using χ 2 and Fischer exact test. RESULTS: In total, 318 patients underwent SLNB, of which 65 were for thin melanoma (≤1 mm). There were 36 positive SLNB, 278 negative SLNB and in four cases the SLN was not located. The incidence rate for SLNB was 11.3% overall and 1.5% in thin melanomas alone. Statistical analysis identified Breslow thickness >1 mm (P = 0.006), Clark level ≥ IV (P = 0.004) and age <75 years (P = 0.035) as the strongest predictors of SLN positivity. Our overall false negativity rate was 20% (9/45) with one case of false-negative SLNB in thin melanomas. CONCLUSION: Breslow thickness of the primary tumour remains the strongest predictor of SLN positivity. Our findings point to a possible limited role for SLNB in thin melanoma due to its low positivity rate, associated false-negative rate and related morbidity.

A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: Although there is a lack of established survival benefit of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), this technique has been increasingly applied in the staging of patients with thin (≤1.00 mm) melanoma (T1Nx), without clear supportive evidence. METHODS: We review the guidelines and available literature on the indications and rationale for performing SLNB in thin melanoma. RESULTS: As a consequence of the paucity of evidence of SLNB in thin melanoma, there is considerable variability in the guidelines. It is difficult to define clinicopathologic factors that reliably predict the presence of nodal metastasis. SLNB does not yet inform management in thin melanoma to improve survival outcome. CONCLUSION: Based on available evidence, high risk patients with melanomas between 0.75 and 1.00 mm may be appropriate candidates to be considered for SLN biopsy after discussing the likelihood of finding evidence of nodal progression, the risks of sentinel node biopsy, and the lack of proven survival benefit from any form of surgical nodal staging.

The trap door flap: a reliable, reproducible method of anterior pinna reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Resection of skin cancers of the conchal fossa and anti-helical rim presents a challenging reconstructive problem. A full thickness skin graft is often used following excision of the cartilage underlying the lesion. Colour mismatch, a contour defect and a donor site scar are potential drawbacks to this method of reconstruction. The postauricular trap door flap offers a superior option for these defects. AIMS: This study aims to assess the reliability and outcomes of the trap door flap for defects of the anterior surface of the pinna. METHODS: A retrospective review of all trap door flaps carried out in Galway University Hospital was carried out. Charts were reviewed in order to examine operative notes and assess for any complications and length of follow up. RESULTS: 45 Patients were operated on by a single surgeon. The age range was 61-93 years. The majority of lesions excised were from the conchal area with 6 defects predominantly involving the scapha. No partial or complete flap loss occurred. 2 patients required further excision due to an incomplete margin and a local recurrence respectively. Follow up ranged from 3 months to 4 years with excellent cosmetic results were achieved in all cases with no scar issues at the flap or donor sites. CONCLUSION: The trap door flap is an excellent method of conchal reconstruction. It is reliable and reproducible with no flap loss demonstrated in our series of 45 patients. Large defects can be reconstructed with this flap and the cosmetic result in terms of colour and contour, as well as a hidden donor site scar, make this a superior option to a full thickness skin graft.

Evaluation of variants in the CHEK2, BRIP1 and PALB2 genes in an Irish breast cancer cohort.

It has been proposed that rare variants within the double strand break repair genes CHEK2, BRIP1 and PALB2 predispose to breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of these variants in an Irish breast cancer cohort and determine their contribution to the development of breast cancer in the west of Ireland. We evaluated the presence of CHEK2_1100delC variant in 903 breast cancer cases and 1,016 controls. Six previously described variants within BRIP1 and five within PALB2 were screened in 192 patients with early-onset or familial breast cancer. Where a variant was evident, it was then examined in the remainder of our 711 unselected breast cancer cases. CHEK2_1100delC was found in 5/903 (0.5%) breast cancer cases compared to 1/1016 (0.1%) controls. One mutation at BRIP1 (2392 C>T) was identified in the early-onset/familial cohort. Examination of this variant in the remainder of our cohort (711 cases) failed to identify any additional cases. None of the previously described PALB2 variants were demonstrated in the early-onset/familial cohort. We show evidence of CHEK2_1100delC and BRIP1 2392 C>T within the Irish population. CHEK2_1100delC and BRIP1 mutations incidence in Ireland is similar to that found in other unselected breast cancer cohorts from northern European countries. We found no evidence to suggest that PALB2 mutation is an important breast cancer predisposition gene in this population.