RESUMEN
Epidermolytic acanthoma is a rare benign tumor that is characterized by epidermolytic hyperkeratosis on histopathology. Epidermolytic acanthoma usually presents in adulthood as an asymptomatic tumor less than 1 cm in diameter with a verrucous surface. Whereas the lesions can present in either an isolated solitary, localized, or disseminated form, there tends to be a predilection for the genitoscrotal area.
Asunto(s)
Acantoma/patología , Condiloma Acuminado/diagnóstico , Escroto/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Acantoma/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing using Hybrid Capture 2 assay with ThinPrep Papanicolaou (Pap) collection is the only US Food and Drug Administration-approved method for the triage of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). Although SurePath Pap collection has been used for Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA testing, clinical validation of this method has been scarce. METHODS: From a cervical cancer-screening program in Mississippi, we analyzed data from screenings of 8380 women with ASCUS Pap results who underwent reflex Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA tests during a course of 4 years. Of these, 4145 were screened with the ThinPrep collection system, and 4235 were screened with SurePath. Results of follow-up biopsies within 3 months of Pap tests were available for the ThinPrep group (229 cases) and the SurePath group (455 cases). Hybrid Capture 2 positive rates and the follow-up biopsy results from both groups were compared. RESULTS: Hybrid Capture 2 detected high-risk HPV DNA in 68.8% of ThinPrep and 66.7% of SurePath-collected specimens (P = .37). Detection rates for CIN2+ and CIN3+ were also comparable between ThinPrep (21.4%, 3.1%) and SurePath (15.4%, 4.2%) using Hybrid Capture 2 (P = .06, P = .45). In ThinPrep-collected specimens, 4.4% were quantitatively insufficient for Hybrid Capture 2 testing. Significantly more equivocal Hybrid Capture 2 results were observed in SurePath (11.4%) than in ThinPrep specimens (3.2%). However, 67.4% of women with equivocal Hybrid Capture 2 results had negative 1-year Pap cytology follow-up in the SurePath group. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid Capture 2 positive rates and CIN2-3 detection rates were comparable for the SurePath and ThinPrep Pap collection systems, thus supporting the use of SurePath for Hybrid Capture 2 testing.
Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/genética , ADN Viral/análisis , Técnicas de Preparación Histocitológica , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/virología , Frotis Vaginal , Virología/métodos , Biopsia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , HumanosRESUMEN
C4d "staining" of interstitial capillaries of endomyocardial biopsies serves as an indicator of a humoral component of cardiac allograft rejection. In the present study, two cardiac allograft recipients were monitored serially for both cellular and humoral rejection. Cellular rejection, evaluated by light microscopy, and humoral rejection, judged by C4d immunofluorescent "staining", were treated with appropriate immunosuppressants. Weekly serial biopsies of the first patient revealed maximal humoral rejection (3+) after 1 week but diminished to 2+ thereafter. Cellular rejection was graded as 3A after 3 weeks but declined steadily to negligible cellular rejection through week 15. Whereas, cellular rejection peaked at 14-21 days, humoral rejection was greatest in the early post-transplant period. Biopsies of the second patient for 12 weeks revealed grade 1A to 1B moderate cellular rejection. Humoral rejection peaked at 3+ "staining" for C4d after 1 week transplant, and then wavered between 2+ (moderate "staining") and 1+ (weak "staining"). Results revealed the significance not only of traditional light microscopy in evaluating the severity of cellular rejection in endomyocardial biopsies of cardiac allotransplants, but also the value of C4d immunofluorescent "staining" of interstitial capillaries as an indicator of humoral rejection episodes, which may require modified therapy.