Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S271-S274, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Following the integration of the electronic health record (EHR) into the healthcare system, concern has grown regarding EHR use on physician well-being. For surgical residents, time spent on the EHR increases the burden of a demanding, hourly restricted schedule and detracts from time spent honing surgical skills. To better characterize these burdens, we sought to describe EHR utilization patterns for plastic surgery residents. METHODS: Integrated plastic surgery resident EHR utilization from March 2019 to March 2020 was extracted via Cerner Analytics at a tertiary academic medical center. Time spent in the EHR on-duty (0600-1759) and off-duty (1800-0559) in the form of chart review, orders, documentation, and patient discovery was analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed in the form of independent t tests and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: Twelve plastic surgery residents spent a daily average of 94 ± 84 minutes on the EHR, one-third of which was spent off-duty. Juniors (postgraduate years 1-3) spent 123 ± 99 minutes versus seniors (postgraduate years 4-6) who spent 61 ± 49 minutes (P < 0.01). Seniors spent 19% of time on the EHR off-duty, compared with 37% for juniors (P < 0.01). Chart review comprised the majority (42%) of EHR usage, followed by patient discovery (22%), orders (14%), documentation (12%), other (6%), and messaging (1%). Seniors spent more time on patient discovery (25% vs 21%, P < 0.001), while juniors spent more time performing chart review (48% vs 36%, P = 0.19). CONCLUSION: Integrated plastic surgery residents average 1.5 hours on the EHR daily. Junior residents spend 1 hour more per day on the EHR, including more time off-duty and more time performing chart review. These added hours may play a role in duty hour violations and detract from obtaining operative skill sets.


Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Computadores
2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(4): 230-235, 2023 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36892540

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Literature characterizing pediatric perineal trauma is sparse and generally limited to females. The purpose of this study was to characterize pediatric perineal injuries with specific focus on patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, and care patterns at a regional level 1 pediatric trauma center. METHODS: Retrospective review of children aged younger than 18 years evaluated at a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2006 to 2017. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-9 and 10 codes. Extracted data included demographics, injury mechanism, diagnostic studies, hospital course, and structures injured. The χ 2 and t tests were used to examine differences between subgroups. Machine learning was used to predict variable importance in determining the need for operative interventions. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 8.5 years. A total of 50.8% were girls. Blunt trauma accounted for 83.8% of injuries. Motor vehicle collisions and foreign bodies were more common in patients aged 12 years and older, whereas falls and bicycle-related injuries were more common in those younger than 12 years ( P < 0.01). Patients younger than 12 years were more likely to sustain blunt trauma with isolated external genital injuries ( P < 0.01). Patients aged 12 and older had a higher incidence of pelvic fractures, bladder/urethral injuries, and colorectal injuries, suggesting more severe injury patterns ( P < 0.01). Half of patients required operative intervention. Children aged 3 years or younger and older than 12 years had longer mean hospital stays compared with children aged 4 to 11 years ( P < 0.01). Mechanism of injury and age constituted more than 75% of the variable importance in predicting operative intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Perineal trauma in children varies by age, sex, and mechanism. Blunt mechanisms are the most common, with patients frequently requiring surgical intervention. Mechanism of injury and age may be important in deciding which patients will require operative intervention. This study describes injury patterns in pediatric perineal trauma that can be used to guide future practice and inform injury prevention efforts.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Fracturas Óseas , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Femenino , Niño , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidentes de Tránsito , Tiempo de Internación , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
3.
J Surg Res ; 267: 619-626, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271269

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The average age and number of comorbidities is increasing among trauma patients. Primary care providers (PCPs) provide pre-injury diagnosis and management of comorbidities that may affect outcomes for injured patients. The role of primary care in trauma systems is currently unknown. METHODS: Observational retrospective review of an institutional trauma databank from 2013 - 2019. PCP was extracted from the electronic medical record and combined with trauma data. Case-control matching was performed to compare outcomes between patients with and without primary care based on age, injury severity score, sex, and injury mechanism. Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and multivariate regression described differences between subgroups. Primary outcome was difference in mortality rate for injured patients with and without PCPs. RESULTS: Within the study period, 19,096 patients were included. 6,626 (34.7%) had a PCP recorded. Of these, 2,158 were matched in a case-control design. Patients with PCPs had a lower mortality rate (1.6%) compared to patients without PCPs (3.6%, P < 0.01). PCP retention was associated with longer length of stay overall, equivalent rates of complications (5.4% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.63), and similar numbers of ICU and ventilator days. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for case-control factors, insurance, and comorbidities conferred an odds ratio of 2.58 (95% Confidence Interval: 1.59 - 4.19, P < 0.001) for survival to discharge. CONCLUSION: Pre-injury primary care significantly improves the odds of survival to discharge for injured patients. Prospective study of this relationship may identify strategies to promote primary care within health systems.


Asunto(s)
Alta del Paciente , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA