RESUMEN
In January 2009, registered dietitians (RDs) at St Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) were granted approval for nonmedication order entry of physician-approved nutrition-related orders for the patients to whom RDs provided care. The aim of this project was to document any changes in the numbers and types of diet order errors and time delays that were associated with this policy change. A retrospective chart audit was conducted to document the error rate in 672 nutrition-related orders placed before, and in 633 orders placed after, implementation of RD diet order entry on high-risk inpatient units. Error rates for all nutrition-related orders decreased by 15% after RD order entry access (P<0.01). Error rates for diet orders entered by RDs were significantly lower in comparison with those entered by clerical assistants or registered nurses (P<0.001). Time delays for orders electronically entered were reduced by 39% (from 9.1 to 5.7 hours; P<0.01). Allowing RDs access to the electronic order entry system has improved overall timeliness of nonmedication order entries and improved patient safety by decreasing error rates in diet orders. This study supports this institutional policy change and provides evidence that RDs have the knowledge and skills to accurately process nonmedication order entries for the patients they have assessed. Finally, the current findings support the need for ongoing education and training of all health professionals in nonmedication order entry to reduce errors and improve safety.
Asunto(s)
Dietética/normas , Auditoría Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería/normas , Terapia Nutricional/normas , Humanos , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/normas , Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Administración de la Seguridad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
While supply chain partnerships are common in the private industry, they are unique in health care. This article looks at the novel partnership between St. Michael's Hospital and Baxter Canada. By sharing information and working together, these organizations evaluated and tackled service disruptions caused by backorders. Their formal collaboration has resulted in a streamlined backorder management process, and more importantly, better and timelier patient care.
Asunto(s)
Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Hospitales de Enseñanza/organización & administración , Industrias/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Equipos y Suministros de Hospitales/economía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Relaciones Interinstitucionales , Ontario , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Sector PrivadoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of offering universal-free school breakfast in elementary schools on students' dietary outcomes. DESIGN: Experimental study with random assignment of 153 matched elementary schools in six school districts. Treatment schools offered universal-free school breakfast, and control schools continued to operate the traditional means-tested School Breakfast Program. Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls were collected from sample students near the end of the first year. SUBJECTS: About 30 students in second through sixth grades were randomly selected from each school (n=4,358). INTERVENTION: Free school breakfasts were made available to all students in treatment schools, regardless of family income, for three consecutive school years (2000-2001 to 2002-2003). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breakfast consumption and food and nutrient intake. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Hierarchical mixed-models and logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, minority status, and income eligibility for the regular school meal programs, were used to estimate effects. RESULTS: Despite a significant increase in school breakfast participation among sample students in treatment schools (from 16% to 40%, P<0.01), the rate of breakfast skipping did not differ between groups (4% overall). Treatment school students were more likely to consume a nutritionally substantive breakfast (P<0.01), but dietary intakes over 24 hours were essentially the same. CONCLUSIONS: Making universal-free school breakfast available in elementary schools did not change students' dietary outcomes after nearly 1 year. To improve children's diets overall, efforts should focus on ensuring all students have access to a healthful breakfast, at home or at school.