Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36241593

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We used consensus-based, systematic protocols to evaluate the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in documenting treatment outcomes for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). STUDY DESIGN: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a focused search of 5 literature databases resulting in a yield of 445 articles that qualified for full-text review. Our review identified 124 PROMs, from which we selected 19 directly related to symptoms of TMD including temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function. RESULTS: We abstracted data on 9 Consensus-based Standards of the selection of health Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) measurement properties and analyzed these data according to COSMIN criteria. Only 3 PROMs provided evidence for at least half of the COSMIN properties: Eight-item Jaw Function Limitations Scale, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-TMD (OHIP-TMD), and TMJ Ankylosis Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Only the OHIP-TMD provided evidence for properties essential to evaluating change over time: reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness. CONCLUSION: We believe these results can alert clinical practitioners to gaps in our knowledge about the most widely used PROMs in TMD practice, and identify topics requiring further study for clinical researchers.


Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/terapia , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico
2.
Nat Commun ; 12(1): 3560, 2021 06 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34117244

RESUMEN

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) remain the only widely available tool for controlling the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We estimated weekly values of the effective basic reproductive number (Reff) using a mechanistic metapopulation model and associated these with county-level characteristics and NPIs in the United States (US). Interventions that included school and leisure activities closure and nursing home visiting bans were all associated with a median Reff below 1 when combined with either stay at home orders (median Reff 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.39) or face masks (median Reff 0.97, 95% CI 0.58-1.39). While direct causal effects of interventions remain unclear, our results suggest that relaxation of some NPIs will need to be counterbalanced by continuation and/or implementation of others.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Política de Salud , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Número Básico de Reproducción , COVID-19/epidemiología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Humanos , Actividades Recreativas , Máscaras , Historia Natural , Pandemias , Cuarentena , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Instituciones Académicas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA