Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial comparing docetaxel chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy with sequential prostatic biopsies from patients with advanced non-castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sequential tissue biopsies taken during clinical trials of novel systemic anticancer therapies for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) may aid pharmacodynamic evaluation and biomarker discovery. We conducted a single institution phase-II open-labeled randomized study to assess the safety, tolerability, and early efficacy of docetaxel chemotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs. ADT alone for patients with advanced non-castration-resistant PCa with sequential prostatic biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomized 30 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade locally advanced or metastatic (cT3-4/N0-1/M0-1) PCa to receive ADT with (n = 15) or without (n = 15) docetaxel. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies were taken at randomization and ~22 weeks after treatment initiation. Primary end point: biochemical response rate. Secondary end points: time to progression and tumor profiling. RESULTS: Both treatments appear to be well tolerated, and there was no difference in mean nadir prostate-specific antigen and time to prostate-specific antigen relapse between treatment arms (P>0.05). No adverse effects of pre- and post-treatment prostatic biopsies were observed. The study was neither designed nor sufficiently powered to demonstrate statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes or safety profiles between the 2 treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of statistical power, our study suggests that docetaxel and ADT in combination may be well tolerated with apparently similar short-term efficacy compared with ADT alone for high-grade locally advanced or metastatic non-castration-resistant PCa, Sequential prostatic biopsies may provide tissue for tumor profiling to yield mechanistic or prognostic insights relating to novel systemic anticancer therapies.

Identification of a candidate prognostic gene signature by transcriptome analysis of matched pre- and post-treatment prostatic biopsies from patients with advanced prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa) can improve patient survival, some tumours are chemo-resistant. Tumour molecular profiles may help identify the mechanisms of drug action and identify potential prognostic biomarkers. We performed in vivo transcriptome profiling of pre- and post-treatment prostatic biopsies from patients with advanced hormone-naive prostate cancer treated with docetaxel chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with an aim to identify the mechanisms of drug action and identify prognostic biomarkers. METHODS: RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) was performed on biopsies from four patients before and ~22 weeks after docetaxel and ADT initiation. Gene fusion products and differentially-regulated genes between treatment pairs were identified using TopHat and pathway enrichment analyses undertaken. Publically available datasets were interrogated to perform survival analyses on the gene signatures identified using cBioportal. RESULTS: A number of genomic rearrangements were identified including the TMPRSS2/ERG fusion and 3 novel gene fusions involving the ETS family of transcription factors in patients, both pre and post chemotherapy. In total, gene expression analyses showed differential expression of at least 2 fold in 575 genes in post-chemotherapy biopsies. Of these, pathway analyses identified a panel of 7 genes (ADAM7, FAM72B, BUB1B, CCNB1, CCNB2, TTK, CDK1), including a cell cycle-related geneset, that were differentially-regulated following treatment with docetaxel and ADT. Using cBioportal to interrogate the MSKCC-Prostate Oncogenome Project dataset we observed a statistically-significant reduction in disease-free survival of patients with tumours exhibiting alterations in gene expression of the above panel of 7 genes (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Here we report on the first "real-time" in vivo RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis of clinical PCa from pre- and post-treatment TRUSS-guided biopsies of patients treated with docetaxel chemotherapy plus ADT. We identify a chemotherapy-driven PCa transcriptome profile which includes the down-regulation of important positive regulators of cell cycle progression. A 7 gene signature biomarker panel has also been identified in high-risk prostate cancer patients to be of prognostic value. Future prospective study is warranted to evaluate the clinical value of this panel.

Next-generation sequencing of advanced prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is standard treatment for locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Many patients develop castration resistance (castration-resistant PCa [CRPC]) after approximately 2-3 yr, with a poor prognosis. The molecular mechanisms underlying CRPC progression are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To undertake quantitative tumour transcriptome profiling prior to and following ADT to identify functionally important androgen-regulated pathways or genes that may be reactivated in CRPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on tumour-rich, targeted prostatic biopsies from seven patients with locally advanced or metastatic PCa before and approximately 22 wk after ADT initiation. Differentially regulated genes were identified in treatment pairs and further investigated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on cell lines and immunohistochemistry on a separate CRPC patient cohort. Functional assays were used to determine the effect of pathway modulation on cell phenotypes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We searched for gene expression changes affecting key cell signalling pathways that may be targeted as proof of principle in a CRPC in vitro cell line model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified ADT-regulated signalling pathways, including the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway, and observed overexpression of ß-catenin in a subset of CRPC by immunohistochemistry. We validated 6 of 12 (50%) pathway members by qRT-PCR on LNCaP/LNCaP-AI cell RNAs, of which 4 (67%) demonstrated expression changes consistent with RNA-seq data. We show that the tankyrase inhibitor XAV939 (which promotes ß-catenin degradation) reduced androgen-independent LNCaP-AI cell line growth compared with androgen-responsive LNCaP cells via an accumulation of cell proportions in the G0/G1 phase and reduction in the S and G2/M phases. Our biopsy protocol did not account for tumour heterogeneity, and pathway inhibition was limited to pharmacologic approaches. CONCLUSIONS: RNA-seq of paired PCa samples revealed ADT-regulated signalling pathways. Proof-of-principle inhibition of the Wnt/ß-catenin signalling pathway specifically delays androgen-independent PCa cell cycle progression and proliferation and warrants further investigation as a potential target for therapy for CRPC.

Self-stunning in thyroid ablation: evidence from comparative studies of diagnostic 131I and 123I.

Twenty-six patients who had undergone recent surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer were investigated using iodine-131 iodide (120 MBq). Uptake in the thyroid bed was measured at 3 days using a dual-head gamma camera. An ablation activity of 131I iodide (4,000 MBq) was administered 3-38 (median 14) days later and uptake in the thyroid bed measured once or twice, 1-3 days post therapy. For measurements post therapy, the gamma camera was operated in the high-count rate mode with appropriate correction factors to compensate for any count loss. A further 16 patients were given iodine-123 iodide (200 MBq) as the diagnostic agent and uptake was measured at 24 h. The ablation activity was administered 5-47 (median 19) days later and uptake again measured at 24 h. In some cases, a further measurement of uptake was made within the period 1-3 days post therapy. Reduced uptake of the therapeutic administration ( P<0.001) was observed in all 26 patients given diagnostic 131I, with a median value of 32.8% (range 6%-93%) of the uptake in the diagnostic study. In the patients given diagnostic 123I, reduced uptake of the ablative radioiodine was observed in 15 of the 16 patients ( P<0.001), and overall the median value was 58.8% (range 17%-130%) of the diagnostic uptake. In one case the uptake post therapy was increased. The stunning observed in the group given 123I was significantly less ( P<0.001) than in the group given 131I. In the patients given diagnostic 131I, stunning appeared to increase in severity the longer the time interval between the diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclides, for intervals up to 25 days. Thereafter, there seemed to be some recovery of uptake capability. Overall there was no evidence of a large rapid loss of radionuclide from the thyroid bed 1-3 days post therapy. The stunning observed using 123I could not be explained by errors in the estimation of relative uptake due to different tissue absorption of the 131I and 123I photons, nor by the radiation dose delivered by the 123I. However, the ablative 131I itself may cause stunning because the cumulated activity, over the first few hours of uptake, is not insignificant when compared with all the cumulated activity from a diagnostic administration of 131I. The resultant radiation dose to the thyroid remnant, as the therapeutic radioiodine is being taken up, may be sufficient to inhibit the uptake process, thus leading to a reduction in maximum uptake when compared with that of a diagnostic activity of radioiodine.