Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
3.
Hastings Cent Rep ; 50(3): 79-80, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596905

RESUMEN

The pandemic creates unprecedented challenges to society and to health care systems around the world. Like all crises, these provide a unique opportunity to rethink the fundamental limiting assumptions and institutional inertia of our established systems. These inertial assumptions have obscured deeply rooted problems in health care and deflected attempts to address them. As hospitals begin to welcome all patients back, they should resist the temptation to go back to business as usual. Instead, they should retain the more deliberative, explicit, and transparent ways of thinking that have informed the development of crisis standards of care. The key lesson to be learned from those exercises in rational deliberation is that justice must be the ethical foundation of all standards of care. Justice demands that hospitals take a safety-net approach to providing services that prioritizes the most vulnerable segments of society, continue to expand telemedicine in ways that improve access without exacerbating disparities, invest in community-based care, and fully staff hospitals and clinics on nights and weekends.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/ética , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Nivel de Atención/ética , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/ética , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/ética , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Pandemias , Admisión y Programación de Personal/ética , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Nivel de Atención/organización & administración , Telemedicina/ética , Telemedicina/organización & administración
4.
Hastings Cent Rep ; 49(1): 21-23, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790311

RESUMEN

Tim Wardle's 2018 documentary film Three Identical Strangers is an exploration of identity, family, and loss. It's also about nature versus nurture and the boundaries of ethically permissible research, particularly research involving children. The film tells the story of identical triplets who were separated soon after birth in 1961. A different family adopted each boy, without being told that their son had two identical brothers. The adoption agency responsible for finding the families was collaborating with a group of researchers working on a study about … something. Three Identical Strangers details the boys' fight to obtain information about the study and for closure. But while the film may have received rave reviews, it left us feeling uneasy. We came away with two sets of questions, one having to do with the story that the film documents and the second with the ethics of filmmaking itself.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/ética , Películas Cinematográficas , Trillizos , Acceso a la Información/ética , Adopción , Humanos , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA