de Souza interprofessional practice cancer competency framework.

PURPOSE: As the demand in cancer care continues to increase, health systems require a workforce of highly educated specialists and generalists to provide continuity of care across settings. OBJECTIVES: Led by de Souza Institute in Canada, an interdisciplinary working group was formed to develop a competency framework with relevance across regulated health professionals involved in cancer care. METHODS: The working group was presented with results from a scoping review of national and international guidelines, standards, and competencies in oncology, as well as data from needs assessments on continuing education opportunities and oncology topics most relevant to clinicians. Fifty-one professionals from, e.g., family medicine, pharmacy, social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and nursing participated in seven focus groups. An additional 32 nurses participated in a nursing-specific needs assessment survey. Using modified Delphi technique, working group members conducted three iterative rounds to review data and built consensus on competency items in relation to three levels of expertise, from early learner/novice practitioner, advancing practitioner, to expert practitioner. RESULTS: A final consensus was reached for the selection of competencies that reflect optimal cancer care mapped into three levels of expertise, as well as knowledge, skills, and attitudes expected of each level. Examples for the competency for early learner/novice practitioner include the following: Have awareness of common ethical issues in cancer care (knowledge); demonstrate ability to discuss, educate, and counsel patients and their support persons(s) regarding preferences (skills); and appreciate the impact of culture, the sensitivity, and diversity of attitudes in relation to cancer (attitude). Expert practitioner examples include: recognition of need for, and ability to advocate for challenges involving equity and access in order to improve health outcomes (skill) and awareness of workplace complexities, such as provider roles, team functioning, and organizational environments affecting patient-practitioner relationships (attitude). CONCLUSION: The de Souza Interprofessional practice cancer competency framework provides a set of shared competencies and a novice to expert pathway for clinicians across disciplines and supports a more standardized learning and comprehensive approach in organizing professional development towards a coordinated, high quality, and person-centered care.

What is "the patient perspective" in patient engagement programs? Implicit logics and parallels to feminist theories.

Public and patient involvement (PPI) in health care may refer to many different processes, ranging from participating in decision-making about one's own care to participating in health services research, health policy development, or organizational reforms. Across these many forms of public and patient involvement, the conceptual and theoretical underpinnings remain poorly articulated. Instead, most public and patient involvement programs rely on policy initiatives as their conceptual frameworks. This lack of conceptual clarity participates in dilemmas of program design, implementation, and evaluation. This study contributes to the development of theoretical understandings of public and patient involvement. In particular, we focus on the deployment of patient engagement programs within health service organizations. To develop a deeper understanding of the conceptual underpinnings of these programs, we examined the concept of "the patient perspective" as used by patient engagement practitioners and participants. Specifically, we focused on the way this phrase was used in the singular: "the" patient perspective or "the" patient voice. From qualitative analysis of interviews with 20 patient advisers and 6 staff members within a large urban health network in Canada, we argue that "the patient perspective" is referred to as a particular kind of situated knowledge, specifically an embodied knowledge of vulnerability. We draw parallels between this logic of patient perspective and the logic of early feminist theory, including the concepts of standpoint theory and strong objectivity. We suggest that champions of patient engagement may learn much from the way feminist theorists have constructed their arguments and addressed critique.

Qualitative Study: Exploring the Experiences of Family Caregivers within an Inpatient Neurology and Neurosurgery Hospital Setting.

The aim of this study was to further understanding of what it means for family caregivers to be included in their relatives' care and identify what type of care they are providing. This study used a qualitative research design to recruit 12 participants, who were family caregivers, from the adult neurology and neurosurgery units at a hospital located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The data were collected using semistructured interviews, which were conducted in person and ranged between 30 and 60 minutes in length. Analysis of the data was conducted using phenomenological guidelines and principles. Upon review, the results indicated that the participants shared common experiences that were grouped into three main themes: (1) unfamiliarity with the hospital environment and procedures, (2) identifying the hidden realities of families and caregivers, and (3) strengthening collaborative dialogues and opportunities. Overall, this study exemplified that the need to continue to recognize family caregivers' experiences and their involvement is paramount in being able to understand how and in what way patient care can be better optimized collaboratively, during treatment delivery and recovery stages.

Disparities in cancer care: perspectives from the front line.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate how frontline healthcare professionals witness and understand disparity in cancer care. METHOD: Six healthcare providers from a range of care settings, none with < 15 years of frontline experience, engaged with researchers in an iterative process of identifying and reflecting on equity and disparity in cancer care. This knowledge exchange began with formal interviews. Thematic analysis of the interviews form the basis of this article. RESULTS: Participants drew attention to health systems issues, the meaning and experience of discontinuities in care for patients at personal and community levels, and the significance of social supports. Other concerns raised by participants were typical of the literature on healthcare disparities. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Providers at the front lines of care offer a rich source of insight into the operation of disparities, pointing to mechanisms rarely identified in traditional quantitative studies. They are also well positioned to advocate for more equitable care at the local level.

"Below their notice": exploring women's subjective experiences of cancer system exclusion.

BACKGROUND: The experiences that marginalized breast cancer populations have in common are rarely considered. METHODS: The authors look across 3 qualitative studies to explore the experiences of older, lower-income, and Aboriginal women diagnosed with cancer and treated by the cancer care system in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The research examines critical moments in participants' narratives that parallel one another and are categorized within 2 themes: Not Getting Cancer Care and Not Getting Supportive Care. CONCLUSIONS: Although exploratory, the findings merit attention both for what they tell us about women's experiences, and because they suggest disparities in access to treatment and psychosocial support.