A Phase II Trial of Lutikizumab, an Anti-Interleukin-1α/ß Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin, in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients With Synovitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of the anti-interleukin-1α/ß (anti-IL-1α/ß) dual variable domain immunoglobulin lutikizumab (ABT-981) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and evidence of synovitis. METHODS: Patients (n = 350; 347 analyzed) with Kellgren/Lawrence grade 2-3 knee OA and synovitis (determined by magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or ultrasound) were randomized to receive placebo or lutikizumab 25, 100, or 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 50 weeks. The coprimary end points were change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score at week 16 and change from baseline in MRI-assessed synovitis at week 26. RESULTS: The WOMAC pain score at week 16 had improved significantly versus placebo with lutikizumab 100 mg (P = 0.050) but not with the 25 mg or 200 mg doses. Beyond week 16, the WOMAC pain score was reduced in all groups but was not significantly different between lutikizumab-treated and placebo-treated patients. Changes from baseline in MRI-assessed synovitis at week 26 and other key symptom- and most structure-related end points at weeks 26 and 52 were not significantly different between the lutikizumab and placebo groups. Injection site reactions, neutropenia, and discontinuations due to neutropenia were more frequent with lutikizumab versus placebo. Reductions in neutrophil and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels plateaued with lutikizumab 100 mg, with further reductions not observed with the 200 mg dose. Immunogenic response to lutikizumab did not meaningfully affect systemic lutikizumab concentrations. CONCLUSION: The limited improvement in the WOMAC pain score and the lack of synovitis improvement with lutikizumab, together with published results from trials of other IL-1 inhibitors, suggest that IL-1 inhibition is not an effective analgesic/antiinflammatory therapy in most patients with knee OA and associated synovitis.

Phase IIa, placebo-controlled, randomised study of lutikizumab, an anti-interleukin-1α and anti-interleukin-1ß dual variable domain immunoglobulin, in patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anti-interleukin (IL)-1α/ß dual variable domain immunoglobulin lutikizumab (ABT-981) in erosive hand osteoarthritis (HOA). METHODS: Patients with ≥1 erosive and ≥3 tender and/or swollen hand joints were randomised to placebo or lutikizumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain subdomain score from baseline to 16 weeks. At baseline and week 26, subjects had bilateral hand radiographs and MRI of the hand with the greatest number of baseline tender and/or swollen joints. Continuous endpoints were assessed using analysis of covariance models, with treatment and country as main factors and baseline measurements as covariates. RESULTS: Of 132 randomised subjects, 1 received no study drug and 110 completed the study (placebo, 61/67 (91%); lutikizumab, 49/64 (77%)). AUSCAN pain was not different among subjects treated with lutikizumab versus placebo at week 16 (least squares mean difference, 1.5 (95% CI -1.9 to 5.0)). Other clinical and imaging endpoints were not different between lutikizumab and placebo. Lutikizumab significantly decreased serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein levels, IL-1α and IL-1ß levels, and blood neutrophils. Lutikizumab pharmacokinetics were consistent with phase I studies and not affected by antidrug antibodies. Injection site reactions and neutropaenia were more common in the lutikizumab group; discontinuations because of adverse events occurred more frequently with lutikizumab (4/64) versus placebo (1/67). CONCLUSION: Despite adequate blockade of IL-1, lutikizumab did not improve pain or imaging outcomes in erosive HOA compared with placebo.

Longitudinal Reliability of the OMERACT Thumb Base Osteoarthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System (TOMS).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the longitudinal reliability of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Thumb base Osteoarthritis Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Scoring system (TOMS). METHODS: Paired MRI of patients with hand osteoarthritis were scored in 2 exercises (6-mo and 2-yr followup) for synovitis, subchondral bone defects (SBD), osteophytes, cartilage assessment, bone marrow lesions (BML), and subluxation. Interreader reliability of delta scores was assessed. RESULTS: Little change occurred. Average-measure intraclass correlation coefficients were good-excellent (≥ 0.71), except synovitis (0.55-0.83) and carpometacarpal-1 osteophytes/cartilage assessment (0.47/0.39). Percentage exact/close agreement was 52-92%/68-100%, except BML in 2 years (28%/64-76%). Smallest detectable change was below the scoring increment, except in SBD and BML. CONCLUSION: TOMS longitudinal reliability was moderate-good. Limited change hampered assessment.

Pharmacokinetics of the B-Cell Lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) Inhibitor Venetoclax in Female Subjects with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Venetoclax is an oral selective Bcl-2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion. Mechanistic and preclinical evidence warranted evaluation of venetoclax for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This work characterized the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in female subjects with SLE. METHODS: Single (10-500 mg) and multiple (30-600 mg) escalating doses of venetoclax or matching placebo were evaluated using randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled designs (6 active and 2 placebo per dose with 73 unique SLE patients enrolled, 25 of whom enrolled twice). The multiple-dose evaluation consisted of two cycles, each with once-daily dosing for 7 days followed by a 21-day washout. Non-compartmental and population pharmacokinetic analyses of venetoclax serial plasma concentrations were conducted. RESULTS: Venetoclax exhibited approximately dose-proportional exposures, with peak concentrations observed 4-8 h post-dose. Venetoclax steady-state exposures were achieved by day 4 of dosing, and the median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) accumulation ratio ranged from 1.1 to 1.5. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination described venetoclax pharmacokinetics. The estimates (95% bootstrap confidence interval) for venetoclax apparent clearance, central and peripheral volumes of distribution, intercompartmental clearance, absorption rate constant, and lag time were 16.3 L/h (14.6-17.9), 37 L (26-57), 122 L (98-183), 3.7 L/h (2.6-5.0), 0.13 h-1 (0.11-0.17), and 1.6 h (1.6-1.7), respectively. The population estimate for venetoclax terminal-phase elimination half-life was approximately 28 h. CONCLUSIONS: In female subjects with SLE, venetoclax displayed pharmacokinetic characteristics consistent with previous observations in subjects with hematologic malignancies. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01686555.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs by age and joint location among osteoarthritis patients in a privately insured population.

AIMS: To compare healthcare resource utilization and costs between patients aged 18-64 years with osteoarthritis (OA) and matched controls without OA in a privately insured population. METHODS: Patients with OA were selected from de-identified US-based employer claims (Q1:1999-Q3:2011). The index date was defined as the first OA diagnosis indicated by ICD-9-CM codes. One year before and after the index date were defined as the baseline and study periods, respectively. A second OA diagnosis during the study period was also required. Patients with OA were matched one-to-one on age, gender, index date, and minimum length of follow-up to controls without OA. Baseline characteristics and study period resource utilization and costs (2016 USD) were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: This study identified 199,539 patients with OA (knee: 87,271, hip: 19,953, hand: 15,670, spine: 12,496). The average age was 54 years, and 58% were female. OA patients had higher healthcare resource utilization than matched controls in inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient settings (p < .001 for all). Further, patients with OA had 4-times the excess total medical costs of their matched controls ($14,521 vs $3,629; p < .001). Patients with hip OA had the highest medical costs among all joint locations. Outpatient and pharmacy costs were similar among patients with knee, hip, and hand OA, but higher in patients with spine OA. In sub-group analyses, older patients (45-64 years old) had higher costs. LIMITATIONS: This sample, obtained using claims data, only includes patients who were actively seeking care for OA and were likely symptomatic. Asymptomatic patients would likely not be captured in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OA incur greater healthcare resource utilization and costs than patients without OA, with substantial variation by joint location.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin ABT-981 Against IL-1α and IL-1ß in Healthy Subjects and Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

The interleukin (IL)-1 family of proinflammatory cytokines are thought to play a significant role in the structural progression of osteoarthritis and its associated symptoms. IL-1α and IL-1ß are 2 distinct cytokines found in the cartilage, synovial membrane, and synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis. The aim of these studies was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ABT-981, a dual variable domain immunoglobulin (DVD-Ig) capable of simultaneously binding IL-1α and IL-1ß, in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Fifty-six healthy adult subjects were randomized to receive single doses of ABT-981 intravenously (0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg), subcutaneously (0.3, 1, 3 mg/kg), or matching placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Thirty-six patients with osteoarthritis of the knee were randomized to receive 4 subcutaneous ABT-981 doses of 0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks, 3 subcutaneous doses of ABT-981 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks, or matching placebo in a 7:2 active:placebo ratio. ABT-981 behaved similarly to conventional monoclonal antibodies following single or multiple doses with mean maximum serum concentrations 2 to 9 days after subcutaneous doses, mean terminal half-lives of 10 to 14 days, and an absolute subcutaneous bioavailability of 46%. Exposure of ABT-981 was approximately linear following single or multiple doses every 2 weeks with monoexponential decline of terminal-phase concentrations. The most common adverse events associated with ABT-981 were diarrhea and headache in healthy subjects and injection site erythema in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee. Decreased absolute neutrophil counts were observed in response to ABT-981 administration.

Pharmacological modulation of brain activity in a preclinical model of osteoarthritis.

The earliest stages of osteoarthritis are characterized by peripheral pathology; however, during disease progression chronic pain emerges-a major symptom of osteoarthritis linked to neuroplasticity. Recent clinical imaging studies involving chronic pain patients, including osteoarthritis patients, have demonstrated that functional properties of the brain are altered, and these functional changes are correlated with subjective behavioral pain measures. Currently, preclinical osteoarthritis studies have not assessed if functional properties of supraspinal pain circuitry are altered, and if these functional properties can be modulated by pharmacological therapy either by direct or indirect action on brain systems. In the current study, functional connectivity was first assessed in order to characterize the functional neuroplasticity occurring in the rodent medial meniscus tear (MMT) model of osteoarthritis-a surgical model of osteoarthritis possessing peripheral joint trauma and a hypersensitive pain state. In addition to knee joint trauma at week 3 post-MMT surgery, we observed that supraspinal networks have increased functional connectivity relative to sham animals. Importantly, we observed that early and sustained treatment with a novel, peripherally acting broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor (MMPi) significantly attenuates knee joint trauma (cartilage degradation) as well as supraspinal functional connectivity increases in MMT animals. At week 5 post-MMT surgery, the acute pharmacodynamic effects of celecoxib (selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor) on brain function were evaluated using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) and functional connectivity analysis. Celecoxib was chosen as a comparator, given its clinical efficacy for alleviating pain in osteoarthritis patients and its peripheral and central pharmacological action. Relative to the vehicle condition, acute celecoxib treatment in MMT animals yielded decreased phMRI infusion responses and decreased functional connectivity, the latter observation being similar to what was detected following chronic MMPi treatment. These findings demonstrate that an assessment of brain function may provide an objective means by which to further evaluate the pathology of an osteoarthritis state as well as measure the pharmacodynamic effects of therapies with peripheral or peripheral and central pharmacological action.

Modeling pandemic preparedness scenarios: health economic implications of enhanced pandemic vaccine supply.

Influenza pandemic planning is a complex, multifactorial process, which involves public health authorities, regulatory authorities, academia and industry. It is further complicated by the unpredictability of the time of emergence and severity of the next pandemic and the effectiveness of influenza epidemic interventions. The complexity and uncertainties surrounding pandemic preparedness have so far kept the various stakeholders from joining forces and tackling the problem from its roots. We developed a mathematical model, which shows the tangible consequences of conceptual plans by linking possible pandemic scenarios to health economic outcomes of possible intervention strategies. This model helps to structure the discussion on pandemic preparedness and facilitates the translation of pandemic planning concepts to concrete plans. The case study for which the model has been used shows the current level of global pandemic preparedness in an assumed pandemic scenario, the health economic implications of enhanced pandemic vaccine supply and the importance of cell culture-based influenza vaccine manufacturing technologies as a tool for pandemic control.