A machine learning tool for re-planning and adaptive RT: A multicenter cohort investigation.

PURPOSE: To predict patients who would benefit from adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and re-planning intervention based on machine learning from anatomical and dosimetric variations in a retrospective dataset. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 90 patients (pts) treated for head-neck cancer (H&N) formed a multicenter data-set. 41 H&N pts (45.6%) were considered for learning; 49 pts (54.4%) were used to test the tool. A homemade machine-learning classifier was developed to analyze volume and dose variations of parotid glands (PG). Using deformable image registration (DIR) and GPU, patients' conditions were analyzed automatically. Support Vector Machines (SVM) was used for time-series evaluation. "Inadequate" class identified patients that might benefit from replanning. Double-blind evaluation by two radiation oncologists (ROs) was carried out to validate day/week selected for re-planning by the classifier. RESULTS: The cohort was affected by PG mean reduction of 23.7±8.8%. During the first 3weeks, 86.7% cases show PG deformation aligned with predefined tolerance, thus not requiring re-planning. From 4th week, an increased number of pts would potentially benefit from re-planning: a mean of 58% of cases, with an inter-center variability of 8.3%, showed "inadequate" conditions. 11% of cases showed "bias" due to DIR and script failure; 6% showed "warning" output due to potential positioning issues. Comparing re-planning suggested by tool with recommended by ROs, the 4th week seems the most favorable time in 70% cases. CONCLUSIONS: SVM and decision-making tool was applied to overcome ART challenges. Pts would benefit from ART and ideal time for re-planning intervention was identified in this retrospective analysis.

Treatment of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy by Endoscopic Internal Drainage (EID).

BACKGROUND: Leaks are considered one of the major complications of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with a reported rate up to 7 %. Drainage of the collection coupled with SEMS deployment is the most frequent treatment. Its success is variable and burdened by high morbidity and not irrelevant mortality. The aim of this paper is to suggest and establish a new approach by endoscopic internal drainage (EID) for the management of leaks. METHODS: Since March 2013, 67 patients presenting leak following LSG were treated with deployment of double pigtail plastic stents across orifice leak, positioning one end inside the collection and the other end in remnant stomach. The aim of EID is to internally drain the collection and at the same time promote leak healing. RESULTS: Double pigtails stent were successfully delivered in 66 out of 67 patients (98.5 %). Fifty patients were cured by EID after a mean time of 57.5 days and an average of 3.14 endoscopic sessions. Two died for event not related to EID. Nine are still under treatment; five failure had been registered. Six patients developed late stenosis treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS: EID proved to be a valid, curative, and safe mini-invasive approach for treatment of leaks following SG. EID achieves complete drainage of perigastric collections and stimulates mucosal growth over the stent. EID is well tolerated, allows early re-alimentation, and it is burdened by fewer complications than others technique. Long-term follow-up confirms good outcomes with no motility or feeding alterations.

Long-term follow-up after biliary stent placement for postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic stenting is a recognized treatment of postcholecystectomy biliary strictures. Large multicenter reports of its long-term efficacy are lacking. Our aim was to analyze the long-term outcomes after stenting in this patient population, based on a large experience from several centers in France. METHODS: Members of the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy were asked to identify patients treated for a common bile duct postcholecystectomy stricture. Patients with successful stenting and follow-up after removal of stent(s) were subsequently included and analyzed. Main outcome measures were long-term success of endoscopic stenting and related predictors for recurrence (after one stenting period) or failure (at the end of follow-up). RESULTS: A total of 96 patients were eligible for inclusion. The mean number of stents inserted at the same time was 1.9±0.89 (range 1-4). Stent-related morbidity was 22.9% (n=22). The median duration of stenting was 12 months (range 2-96 months). After a mean follow-up of 6.4±3.8 years (range 0-20.3 years) the overall success rate was 66.7% (n=64) after one period of stenting and 82.3% (n=79) after additional treatments. The mean time to recurrence was 19.7±36.6 months. The most significant independent predictor of both recurrence and failure was a pathological cholangiography at the time of stent removal. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic stenting helps to avoid surgery in more than 80% of patients bearing postcholecystectomy common bile duct strictures. However, a persistent anomaly on cholangiography at the time of stent removal is a strong predictor of recurrence and may lead to consideration of surgery.

Endoscopic palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction using self-expandable metallic stents: results of a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastric outlet obstruction is a late event in the natural history of biliopancreatic tumours. Metallic self-expanding stents inserted under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance can be used for palliation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and complications of endoscopic duodenal stenting in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1998 and November 2001, 63 patients (31 women, 32 men; mean age 73 +/- 12) presenting with clinical symptoms of duodenal obstruction underwent endoscopic stenting with large metallic prostheses. Complications and clinical outcome were assessed both retrospectively and prospectively. RESULTS: Of the patients, 58 needed one duodenal stent and two overlapping stents were required in five patients. Stenting was immediately successful in 60/63 patients (95%). At the time of the duodenal procedure, 25 previously inserted biliary stents were still patent; biliary stenting was attempted during the same procedure in 18 patients; and 20 patients had no biliary stricture. There was no procedure-related mortality. There were complications in 30 % of patients: 13 stent obstructions, 4 stent migrations and 2 duodenal perforations (treated surgically). For 44 patients (70%) there were no minor or major digestive problem during their remaining lifetime. An exclusively peroral diet was possible in 58 patients (92%), but was considered satisfactory (solid or soft) in 46/63 patients (73%). Of the patients, 53 (84 %) died between 1 and 64 weeks after the duodenal stenting (median survival 7 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction is feasible and well-tolerated in most patients. Most dysfunctions can be managed endoscopically.

Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy can benefit patients with suspected biliary pancreatitis, although there are procedure-related complications. EUS can be used to select patients for endoscopic sphincterotomy. The results of this strategy were assessed. METHODS: Information on patients referred for EUS were recorded in a database. One hundred twenty-three patients with suspected biliary pancreatitis (57 men, 66 women; median age 55 years) were included and followed. All underwent EUS followed by endoscopic sphincterotomy during the same procedure if choledocholithiasis was identified. Outcomes were studied in relation to the initial severity of biliary pancreatitis (Ranson and Balthazar scores), presence of stones, and time span between onset of biliary pancreatitis and EUS plus endoscopic sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients (28%) had a Ranson score greater than 3 on admission and 38 (31%) were Balthazar D-E. The median time from admission to EUS was 3 days. EUS imaging of the bile duct was complete in all but 3 patients. Thirty-three patients (27%) had choledocholithiasis on EUS and underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Stones were more frequent in patients with jaundice (p < 0.005) and when EUS was performed less than 3 days after admission (p < 0.05). One hundred patients (81%) recovered without complication. Two patients (1.6%) died, 1 had recurrent BP develop, 6 (5%) had further biliary symptoms, and 16 (13%) had complications of pancreatitis develop (9 pseudocysts). There were 3 mild endoscopic sphincterotomy-related complications (complication rate 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In this series in which endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed selectively depending on the endosonographic presence or absence of ductal stones early in the course of the pancreatitis, and not according to its predicted severity, mortality and complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy were low and unrelated to the predicted severity of biliary pancreatitis or the presence of choledocholithiasis. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the superiority of this strategy compared with ERCP alone for the management of biliary pancreatitis.

[Fascioliasis of the common bile duct: endoscopic ultrasonographic diagnosis and endoscopic sphincterotomy]. / Distomatose de la voie biliaire principale: diagnostic écho- endoscopique et traitement par sphinctérotomie endoscopique.

Two cases of biliary fasciolasis are reported. The patients presented with biliary pain and/or acute pancreatitis. Pre-operative ultrasound endoscopy showed main bile duct dilation and linear elongated echogenic structures in the common bile duct lumen. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy were performed. Parasites were endoscopically removed resulting in disappearance of symptoms and biological abnormalities. Serological tests and pathological examination confirmed the presence of Fasciola hepatica. During follow-up, stool examination failed to show any Fasciola hepatica eggs, and in one case, serology became negative. This report emphasizes the value of ultrasound endoscopy in the diagnosis of unsuspected biliary fasciolasis. This report also confirms the therapeutic role of endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with obstructive biliary fasciolasis.

[Granular cell tumor of the common bile duct. Contribution of endoscopic ultrasonography in 2 cases]. / Tumeurs à cellules granuleuses de la voie biliaire principale. Apport de l'écho-endoscopie dans 2 cas.

We report two cases of granular cell tumors involving the common bile duct in patients presenting with obstructive jaundice. Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography showed short asymmetric stricture with small well delimited hypoechoic mass in the distal common bile duct wall and proximal dilatation. These tumors were misdiagnosed as a bile duct carcinoma in one case and biliary metastasis of a melanoma in the other. Histological examination of the resected specimen showed granular cell tumors. A review of the previously reported cases shows that preoperative diagnosis is uncommon. It should be considered when endoscopic ultrasonography performed for biliary obstruction in a young woman shows a small and well limited hypoechoic mass.

Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests.

OBJECTIVE: To define accurate and useful predictors of common bile duct stones (CBDS). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The ability to predict CBDS with noninvasive tests can avoid unnecessary, costly, or risky procedures. METHODS: All patients referred for examination for CBDS by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) from 1993-1996 were prospectively entered in a database. In a first sample selected randomly from the whole population, predictors of CBDS were determined by univariate analysis and logistic regression. Predictors were subsequently tested in that sample and in the rest of the population. A separate analysis was done for patients planned for cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty patients (328 men, 552 women), aged 57.8 +/- 17 years (range 16-94), were included. The prevalence of CBDS was 18.8%. Age, serum levels of bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and alkaline phosphatase, and the existence of jaundice and fever, a dilated bile duct, and a pathologic gallbladder were found to be associated with CBDS. Logistic regression was undertaken separately for patients younger than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; pathologic gallbladder; dilated bile duct) and older than 70 years (predictors: GGT >7 x normal; fever > 38 degrees C; dilated bile duct). Odds ratios were 3 to 6.7. The model was satisfactorily applicable to the second sample; age <70 years: chi2 = 3.3 (NS); age >70 years: chi2 = 3.8 (NS). In patients younger than age 70 and planned for cholecystectomy, the combination of the level of GGT and dilated bile duct predicted CBDS accurately. CONCLUSIONS: A simple screening of patients at risk for CBDS can be achieved with three predictive criteria adapted for the patient's age.

[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography]. / Cholécystectomie laparoscopique et lithiase de la voie biliaire principale: étude prospective sur l'intérêt de l'écho-endoscopie et de la cholangiographie rétrograde endoscopique préopératoires.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones. At present, no consensus has been reached on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of concomitant common bile duct stones. Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy during the same anesthetic procedure could be a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent a prospective endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Fourty-four patients (35%) had at least one predictive factor for common bile duct stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy were performed on the same day. Endoscopic ultrasonography was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy by the same endoscopist in case of common bile duct stones on endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were routinely followed up between 3 and 6 months and one year after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested common bile duct stones in 21 patients (17%). Endoscopic ultrasonography identified a stone in 17 of 44 patients (38.6%) with predictor of common bile duct stones and only in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) without predictor of common bile duct stone. Among these 21 patients, one patient was not investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because of the high risk of sphincterotomy, 19 patients had a stone removed after sphincterotomy, one patient had no visible stone neither on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, nor on exploration of the common bile duct after sphincterotomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in 104 patients (83%). However, two patients in this group were investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because endoscopic ultrasonography was incomplete in one case and because endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in the second case but a stone in the left hepatic duct was detected by ultrasonography. A stone was removed after endoscopic sphincterotomy in these two patients. In the group of 102 patients without stone, 91 out of 92, continued to be asymptomatic during a median follow-up of 8.5 months. One patient with symptoms one month after cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy but no stone was found. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy is a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct for all patients. This alternative is only justifiable in patients with predictor of common bile duct stones.

[MRI cholangiography with rapid spin-echo technique: prospective evaluation of 20 patients]. / Cholangio-IRM en écho de spin rapide: évaluation prospective chez 20 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a MR cholangiographic technique using a non breath-hold fast spin-echo technique in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with suspected bile duct obstruction were prospectively investigated with MR cholangiography using a T2-weighted non breath-hold fast spin-echo technique (TR = 8000-9000 mse, effective TE = 120-266 msec, ETL = 16-32, acquisition time = 1-3 min) with a body coil. Results of MR cholangiography were compared to those obtained with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (n = 20 patients) and endoscopic sonography (n = 12 patients) that were considered as reference. RESULTS: MR cholangiography provided high-quality images in 19 out of 20 cases (95%). MR cholangiography had 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity and 100% accuracy in the diagnosis of bile duct dilation. MR cholangiography had 73% sensitivity, 75% specificity and 73% accuracy in the diagnosis of bile duct obstruction. MR cholangiography failed to depict small stones (< 3 mm) of the main bile duct in 4 cases in which no bile duct dilatation was found. CONCLUSION: MR cholangiography using a non breath-hold fast spin-echo technique depicts bile duct dilatation with a degree of accuracy comparable to that achieved with endoscopic examination. In the absence of bile duct dilatation, small stones of the main bile duct may be undetected with MR cholangiography.

[Inflammatory fibroid polyps of the colon]. / Polypes fibro-inflammatoires du côlon.

Inflammatory fibroid polyp is an uncommon lesion involving the stomach, the small bowel and occasionally the colon. Inflammatory fibroid polyp is a large polypoid lesion arising from the submucosa. It has no malignant potential although extensive infiltration may occur. The main histological characteristics are diffuse inflammatory infiltrate with eosinophils and highly vascularized fibrocytic stroma. Immunohistochemistry is always positive for vimentine and negative for S 100 and desmin. We report four cases of inflammatory fibroid polyps, 3 of which mimicked carcinoma of the colon. Exploratory laparotomy and histopathological examination of the resected specimen were necessary to confirm definitive diagnosis. In the last case, diagnosis was established by histological examination of an endoscopically-removed colonic polyp.

What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: This study was carried out to establish the indications for biliary endoscopy due to biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred nineteen patients (36 men, 86 women; median age 59, range 16-93) were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) to five centers between 1990 and 1994, and included in the study. The delay between LC and ERCP was 105 +/- 21 days. RESULTS: Four types of complications were observed. a) Fifty-seven patients had residual stones or clip migration into the common bile duct (CBD); all were successfully treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). b) Twelve major injuries to the CBD were diagnosed by ERCP; successful surgical repair was carried out in most of these cases. c) Twenty patients had a partial biliary stricture; endoscopic stenting was attempted as a primary procedure in eight patients, with a satisfactory outcome in five (63%). d) Thirty patients had a bile leak; endoscopic therapy (26 patients) led to recovery in 18 (69%). The benefit of endoscopic treatment was less clear in five (19%); ES failed to bring about improvement in three patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: ERCP is indicated when a biliary complication is suspected after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is effective for the treatment of retained stones, clip migration, and bile leakage. Endoscopic stenting may be offered as a primary option in partial CBD strictures.

Endoscopic sphincteroclasy: a useful therapeutic tool for biliary endoscopy in Billroth II gastrectomy patients.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic exploration of the common bile duct is generally more difficult and hazardous in patients with a Billroth II gastrectomy than in patients with normal anatomy. Hydrostatic dilation of the papilla, which we term "endoscopic sphincteroclasy", provides a useful alternative to sphincterotomy in such patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Endoscopic sphincteroclasy was carried out in five patients with a Billroth II anastomosis. There were four men and one woman, aged 58 to 90 years. One patients was cirrhotic, with impaired coagulation. Four presented with typical cholangitis, and one had pain and jaundice. The common bile duct was dilated in all five patients. Four had choledocholithiasis and one had a cholangiocarcinoma. RESULTS: Sphincteroclasy was carried out with balloon dilators mounted on 0.035-inch guide wires. Immediate extraction of stones was achieved in three of the four patients with choledocholithiasis. In one case, a control endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was necessary to remove residual stones, without additional dilation. Insertion of the endoprosthesis was possible without difficulty in the patient with a malignant stricture. None of the patients required a sphincterotomy. No complications were observed up to six months after the sphincteroclasy. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of endoscopic sphincteroclasy in patients with a Billroth II gastrectomy who require endoscopic therapy, as well as in patients in need of emergency bile duct decompression who have impaired coagulation.

[Prevention of hemorrhagic recurrences caused by rupture of esophageal varices, with endoscopic ligation. Prospective study of 50 patients]. / Prévention par ligatures élastiques des récidives hémorragiques par rupture de varices oesophagiennes. Etude prospective de 50 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic sclerotherapy is effective to prevent bleeding of oesophageal varices but is associated with frequent adverse effects. Endoscopic ligation represents a new endoscopic alternative treatment to sclerotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of endoscopic variceal ligation in 50 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who had recently bled from oesophageal varices. METHODS: Patients were followed from 6 to 1140 days (median 310 days). Nine patients were bleeding actively when ligation was performed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (22%) had 13 recurrent bleedings requiring blood transfusion during follow-up. Six recurrences occurred during the first month (3 from bleeding varices, 3 treatment-induced); seven recurrences occurred latter (6 from bleeding varices, 1 treatment-induced). Varices were eradicated in 33 patients (66% of all patients, 82% of patients who survived more than 30 days). Variceal eradication was achieved in 2-9 endoscopic ligation sessions (median 3). Eighteen patients died during the study; one died from bleeding. No patient developed major complications; five patients only complained of mild dysphagia for 24 to 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ligation is a safe and effective method to prevent recurrent bleeding from oesophageal varices.

Perinatal mortality and morbidity in premature birth.

In a study carried out in 100 cases of premature birth in Section "A" of the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University of Turin, the authors report a perinatal mortality rate of 5.4%. Perinatal morbidity was found to be very high (68.2%). These findings--which are perfectly in line with those reported in the literature--explain why premature birth is one of the most important topics of research in modern obstetrics.