COVID-19-associated venous thromboembolism portends worse survival.

Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) seem to be at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development, but there is a paucity of data exploring both the natural history of COVID-19-associated VTE and the risk for poor outcomes after VTE development. This investigation aims to explore the relationship between COVID-19-associated VTE development and mortality. A prospectively maintained registry of patients older than 18 years admitted for COVID-19-related illnesses within an academic health care network between March and September 2020 was reviewed. Codes from the tenth revision of the International Classification of Diseases for VTE were collected. The charts of those patients with a code for VTE were manually reviewed to confirm VTE diagnosis. There were 2,552 patients admitted with COVID-19-related illnesses. One hundred and twenty-six patients (4.9%) developed a VTE. A disproportionate percentage of patients of Black race developed a VTE (70.9% VTE v 57.8% non-VTE; P = .012). A higher proportion of patients with VTE expired during their index hospitalization (22.8% VTE v 8.4% non-VTE; P < .001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, VTE was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio = 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.2; P < .001). Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio = 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.00; P = .049). Hospitalized patients of Black race with COVID-19 were more prone to VTE development, and patients with COVID-19 who developed in-hospital VTE had roughly nearly threefold higher odds of mortality. Further emphasis should be placed on optimizing COVID-19 anticoagulation protocols to reduce mortality in this high-risk cohort.

Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Expression Predicts for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been shown to be associated with favorable outcomes in breast cancer. Predictors of pCR could be useful in guiding treatment decisions regarding neoadjuvant therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate cyclin E as a predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. METHODS: Patients (n = 285) with stage II-III breast cancer were enrolled in a prospective study and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracyclines, taxanes, or combination of the two. Pretreatment biopsies from 190 patients and surgical specimens following chemotherapy from 192 patients were available for immunohistochemical analysis. Clinical and pathologic responses were recorded and associated with presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, cyclin E, adipophilin, programmed cell death-ligand 1, and elastase staining and other patient, tumor and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: The pCR rate was significantly lower in patients with cytoplasmic cyclin E staining compared with those who had no cyclin E expression (16.1% vs 38.9%, P = 0.0005). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the odds of pCR for patients who had cytoplasmic negative tumors was 9.35 times (P value < 0.0001) that compared with patients with cytoplasmic positive tumors after adjusting for ER, PR, and HER2 status. Cytoplasmic cyclin E expression also predicts long-term outcome and is associated with reduced disease free, recurrence free, and overall survival rates, independent of increased pretreatment tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclin E independently predicted response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Hence, its routine immunohistochemical analysis could be used clinically to identify those breast cancer patients expected to have a poor response to anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy.

Surveillance Recommendations after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Should Be Based on Initial Indication for Repair.

BACKGROUND: Current surveillance recommendations after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) include contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans at 1-, 2-, 6-, and 12-month intervals, with annual scans thereafter. Patient compliance with such schedules remains inconsistent for all etiologies of aortic disease. It remains unclear which boundaries prevent compliance and whether compliance is associated with improved aorta-specific outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of a multicenter health-care system's electronic medical records to include all patients who underwent TEVAR from July 1, 2011 to April 1, 2016. Patients were assigned a compliance score of 0 through 4 based on the number of images received at the recommended time intervals. Whether patients underwent any postoperative imaging within 1 year of discharge was also recorded. Patients who died within 12 months of discharge were excluded. Aorta-specific complications included postoperative sac expansion, rupture, or need for additional aortic intervention. RESULTS: A total of 262 patients were included; of whom, 203 (77.5%) received at least one postoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan. Race, insurance status, and distance to hospital were not associated with 12-month compliance or compliance score (all P > 0.05). Regarding 12-month compliance, 76.2% of aneurysm patients, 81.6% of dissection patients, 72.2% of transection patients, and 72.2% of penetrating aortic ulcer patients underwent at least 1 CT scan within the first year (all P > 0.05). There were no differences in compliance score based on indication for repair. The overall aorta-related complication rate was 34.7%. TEVAR for dissection was associated with increased long-term aorta-specific complications (49.5%, P < 0.05 when compared with other indications). CONCLUSIONS: In this large, multihospital analysis of TEVAR outcomes, there was no difference in compliance among patients undergoing TEVAR for major indications, but patients with dissection who required TEVAR had a significant difference in aorta-specific complication rates. TEVAR for dissection should be subject to stricter surveillance guidelines than TEVAR for other indications.

Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients treated between 2009 and 2013 were reviewed from a prospectively collected database. All patients had symptomatic recurrent or advanced breast cancer and had been deemed not to be ideal operative candidates. Treatment consisted of external beam radiotherapy to the primary tumor in the breast or regional lymph nodes, or both, concurrent with either capecitabine, paclitaxel, or cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The grade of acute and late toxicity was evaluated, as was response to treatment, overall survival (OS), and local relapse-free survival (LRFS). RESULTS: Of the 20 patients, 9 (45%) presented with primary disease and 11 (55%) had recurrent disease. A total of 11 (55%) patients had evidence of metastatic disease. The overall clinical response rate was 100%, with a clinical complete response (CR) observed in 65% of patients and a clinical partial response (PR) observed in 35% of patients. At a median follow up of 25.3 months, 2-year LRFS was 73% and 2-year OS was 80%. Local control was significantly better in patients with an initial diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.139; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.014-0.935) and in those who had not had previous in-field radiation (HR, 0.011; 95% CI, 0.005-0.512). The only grade ≥ 3 toxicity was acute dermatologic events (30%) and late dermatologic (15%) events. CONCLUSION: Concurrent CRT with capecitabine, paclitaxel, or cisplatin/etoposide for recurrent or advanced inoperable breast cancer is well tolerated with impressive clinical response rates and durable local control.