Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Surg ; 106(6): 665-671, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30973990

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend treating patients with an internal carotid artery near occlusion (ICANO) with best medical therapy (BMT) based on weak evidence. Consequently, patients with ICANO were excluded from randomized trials. The aim of this individual-patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was to determine the optimal treatment approach. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases in January 2018. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any stroke or death within the first 30 days of treatment, analysed by multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of any stroke or death beyond 30 days up to 1 year after treatment, evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: The search yielded 1526 articles, of which 61 were retrieved for full-text review. Some 32 studies met the inclusion criteria and pooled IPD were available from 11 studies, including some 703 patients with ICANO. Within 30 days, any stroke or death was reported in six patients (1·8 per cent) in the carotid endarterectomy (CEA) group, five (2·2 per cent) in the carotid artery stenting (CAS) group and seven (4·9 per cent) in the BMT group. This resulted in a higher 30-day stroke or death rate after BMT than after CEA (odds ratio 5·63, 95 per cent c.i. 1·30 to 24·45; P = 0·021). No differences were found between CEA and CAS. The 1-year any stroke- or death-free survival rate was 96·1 per cent for CEA, 94·4 per cent for CAS and 81·2 per cent for BMT. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that BMT alone is not superior to CEA or CAS with respect to 30-day or 1-year stroke or death prevention in patients with ICANO. These patients do not appear to constitute a high-risk group for surgery, and consideration should made to including them in future RCTs of internal carotid artery interventions.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Interna , Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Stents , Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Endarterectomía Carotidea/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Neurol ; 265(10): 2471, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30151655

RESUMEN

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake.

4.
J Neurol ; 265(8): 1900-1905, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29916130

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Near occlusion (NO) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) with full collapse (NOFC) is a rare condition, with a prevalence of around 1%. Guidelines on carotid stenosis recommend a conservative treatment in patients with a single-event ipsilateral to a NOFC, but the optimal treatment for patients with recurrent symptoms associated with NOFC remains uncertain. We describe a consecutive series of patients with recurrent symptoms associated with NOFC (RSNOFC) who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: From 2008 to 2017, 17 consecutive patients with RSNOFC were treated according to our standardized multidisciplinary work-up and protocol and included for this single-center cohort study. NO was defined according to the angiographic North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria. Only patients with NOFC were included in this study. RESULTS: Standard longitudinal CEA was performed in 15 patients, whereas in 2 patients the ICA was ligated with concomitant endarterectomy of the ECA. Within 30 postoperative days, one patient died from a hemorrhagic infarction. During follow-up (median 23 months) one patient died of unknown cause 90 days after CEA. No TIA, stroke, myocardial infarction or re-stenosis occurred in the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with RSNOFC, CEA may be considered a potential treatment option. Although procedural risks in this small subgroup may be higher as compared to patients with low-to-moderate risk anatomy, this risk may outbalance the natural course.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Carótida Interna/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA