Comorbidities, biomarkers and cause specific mortality in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A phenome-wide association study.

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the most common functional digestive disorders. Our understanding about its comorbidities, biomarkers, or long-term risks is still incomplete. OBJECTIVE: To characterize comorbidities and biomarkers for IBS and establish the effect of IBS on overall- and cause specific mortality. METHODS: We analyzed data from the population-based cohort of the UK Biobank (UKB) with 493,974 participants, including self-reported physician-diagnosed (n = 20,603) and ICD-10 diagnosed (n = 7656) IBS patients, with a mean follow-up of 11 years. We performed a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) and competing risk analysis to characterize common clinical features in IBS patients. RESULTS: In PheWAS analyses, 260 PheCodes were significantly overrepresented in self-reported physician-diagnosed IBS patients, 633 in patients with ICD-10 diagnosed IBS (ICD-10-IBS), with 221 (40%) overlapping. In addition to gastrointestinal diseases, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, and endocrine/metabolic disorders represented the most strongly associated PheCodes in IBS patients. Self-reported physician-diagnosed IBS was not associated with increased overall mortality and the risk of death from cancer was decreased (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78 [95% CI = 0.7-0.9]). Lastly, we evaluated changes in serum metabolites in IBS patients and identified glycoprotein acetyls (GlycA) as a potential biomarker in IBS. One standard deviation increase in GlycA raised the risk of self-reported IBS/ICD-10 coded by 9%-20% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.09 [95% CI = 1.1-1.1]/OR = 1.20 [95% CI = 1.1-1.3]) and the risk of overall mortality in ICD-10-IBS patients by 28% (HR = 1.28 [95% CI = 1.1-1.5]). CONCLUSION: Our large-scale association study determined IBS patients having an increased risk of several different comorbidities and that GlycA was increased in IBS patients.

Characteristics and opinions of MD-PhD students and graduates from different European countries: a study from the European MD-PhD Association.

BACKGROUND: MD-PhD programmes throughout the world provide a platform for medical trainees to commit to a physician-scientist career, qualifying with both a medical degree (MD or equivalent) and Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). However, there are limited studies assessing the characteristics of MD-PhD programmes in Europe and the outcomes of MD-PhD students and graduates. PURPOSE: This study aims at a first country-wise exploration of characteristics, opinions, and academic outcomes of MD-PhD students and graduates in Europe. METHODS: Two questionnaires were developed to assess the demographics, MD-PhD programme characteristics, opinions, future career paths and academic outcomes of European MD-PhD students and graduates. An online survey of 278 MD-PhD students and 121 MD-PhD graduates from nine and six European countries, respectively, was completed between April 2016 and December 2017. The country-wise categorical responses were then compared through chi-square analysis followed by multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Responses from 266 MD-PhD students and 117 MD-PhD graduates were considered valid. Significant country-wise differences (p <0.05) were observed for age group, resident status, clinical time allocation, duration of studies, sources of funding, publications, average impact factor of the journals in which the research was published, satisfaction with the duration of MD-PhD studies and future career choices of MD-PhD students. Responses related to self-perception about clinical and research competence and challenges faced during MD-PhD training did not show a significant country-wise difference. CONCLUSION: The MD-PhD workforce in Europe is highly diverse in their demographics, programme characteristics and career paths but does not differ in opinions related to the challenges faced. The results of this study may be helpful for implementation and improvement of MD-PhD programmes.

Minimizing endpoint variability through reinforcement learning during reaching movements involving shoulder, elbow and wrist.

Reaching movements are comprised of the coordinated action across multiple joints. The human skeleton is redundant for this task because different joint configurations can lead to the same endpoint in space. How do people learn to use combinations of joints that maximize success in goal-directed motor tasks? To answer this question, we used a 3-degree-of-freedom manipulandum to measure shoulder, elbow and wrist joint movements during reaching in a plane. We tested whether a shift in the relative contribution of the wrist and elbow joints to a reaching movement could be learned by an implicit reinforcement regime. Unknown to the participants, we decreased the task success for certain joint configurations (wrist flexion or extension, respectively) by adding random variability to the endpoint feedback. In return, the opposite wrist postures were rewarded in the two experimental groups (flexion and extension group). We found that the joint configuration slowly shifted towards movements that provided more control over the endpoint and hence higher task success. While the overall learning was significant, only the group that was guided to extend the wrist joint more during the movement showed substantial learning. Importantly, all changes in movement pattern occurred independent of conscious awareness of the experimental manipulation. These findings suggest that the motor system is generally sensitive to its output variability and can optimize joint-space solutions that minimize task-relevant output variability. We discuss biomechanical biases (e.g. joint's range of movement) that could impose hurdles to the learning process.