Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Compliance With Utilization of a Mail-In Semen Analysis Kit.

PURPOSE: The AUA recommends postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) to verify successful vasectomy. However there remains poor patient compliance. We sought to assess whether mail-in PVSA improves patient compliance across a wide range of practice types. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective data were collected on all men who received a Fellow PVSA kit between April 2021 and August 2023 in a nationwide cohort. Date of kit activation, practice type, clinic zip code, and date of kit accession/processing at the lab was collected. Compliance rates for each practice area were reported. χ2 tests of independence, logistic regression models, and multivariable logistic analysis were performed to assess the impact of relevant variables. RESULTS: Overall compliance across all practice areas was 69% following an 18-week period of observation (n = 16,105) and 82% (n = 6687) following a 40-week period. Compliance rates were highest and similar for small urology practices (<5 providers), including Veterans Affairs practices, ranging from 76% to 82% at 18 weeks to 85% to 87% at 40 weeks. Large urology practices had slightly lower compliance rates with 66% at 18 weeks to 80% at 40 weeks. The univariable logistic regression model demonstrated that patients in small urology practices have a 63% greater odds of 26-week compliance, on average, compared to those who receive care in large urology practices (odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.48-1.79). CONCLUSIONS: Fellow's mail-in PVSA offers improved PVSA compliance over previously published data. Improved compliance is seen across all practice types. Despite these successes, there is significant room for improvement to achieve 100% compliance.

Reproductive Health Assessment and Reports of Fertility Counseling in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Sickle Cell Disease After Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) place patients at risk for reproductive health issues. The purpose of this study was to assess reproductive health and reports of fertility counseling in patients with SCD who received a transplant. This was a secondary analysis of gonadal hormone production, future infertility risk assessment, and parent-proxy/patient reports of fertility counseling in SCD transplant recipients who are currently pubertal and were enrolled in the Atlanta sites of the Sickle Cell Transplant Evaluation of Long-term and Late Effects Registry (STELLAR) between May 2017 and October 2023. Clinical information was abstracted from medical records and reproductive health survey data from the STELLAR database. Descriptive statistics were reported as median (interquartile range [IQR]) or percentages. There were 20 females and 12 males in the study population. Females were median (IQR) 19.6 (9.4) years old and males 20.8 (11.4) years old at the time of the study. Transplants most commonly occurred in the decade 2010 to 2019 at 10.7 (4.8) years old for females and 11.1 (4.1) years old for males. Most participants received bone marrow stem cells (95.0% females, 100.0% males) from matched sibling donors (90.0% females, 100.0% males). Participants received one of seven HCT conditioning regimens with cyclophosphamide equivalent doses ranging from 3388 to 9706 mg/m2. The majority of females (90.0%) had diminished ovarian reserve with low anti-Mullerian hormone levels, and 61.1% had premature ovarian insufficiency with two follicle-stimulating hormone levels (FSH) ≥40 mIU/mL post-HCT. All males had normal testosterone levels, but 63.6% had elevated FSH levels suggestive of impaired spermatogenesis post-HCT. Parent proxies (for patients <18 years old) and patients ≥18 years old completed surveys 9.0 years (5.2) and 7.9 years (9.3) since HCT in females and males respectively. Twenty-five percent of parent proxies and 45% of patients reported that they had not been informed by a healthcare provider of the risk of infertility post-transplant. There are high rates of gonadal dysfunction post-HCT, but many parent proxies and patients do not recall being told of the risk for future infertility. More effective methods of education are warranted to ensure SCD patients and their families clearly understand the risk for reproductive health issues post-HCT.

Impact of Anti-Discrimination Legislation on Access to Gender-affirming Care: A Commercial Claims Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the temporal relationship between the anti-discrimination rules of the Affordable Care Act, which took full effect in 2017, and the incidence of commercial claims for gender-affirming care, as well as cost sharing for these services. METHODS: We used a previously described algorithm to define a cohort of gender-diverse adults in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Claims for gender-affirming medical and surgical care were identified using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes plus pharmacy data; the annual incidence of surgical claims was calculated. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate the temporal relationship between claims and anti-discrimination legislation. Claims data were also used to evaluate the patient contribution towards services. RESULTS: There were 70,733 gender-diverse adults included in the study and 36,702 (51.9%) of them filed claims for gender-affirming care. The incidence of persons with claims for gender-affirming surgery increased from 0.002% in 2009 to 0.012% in 2021. Interrupted time series analyses demonstrated a greater year-to-year increase in claims after anti-discrimination policy influences took effect. This change was greatest for transmasculine chest procedures. The median lifetime net payment for gender-affirming surgery was $12,429.10 and cost sharing was $1019.20 (8.6%). CONCLUSION: Commercial claims for gender-affirming surgery increased temporally with respect to implementation of anti-discrimination legislation and cost-sharing was reasonably low. However, many gender-diverse persons did not have claims for gender-affirming care, which may indicate continued out-of-pocket payment for these services.

Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making Among Urology Applicants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-exempt REDCap survey was distributed through the Society of Academic Urologists to all 508 applicants registered for the 2023 Urology Match following the rank list submission deadline on January 10, 2023. The survey closed on February 1, 2023. Responses were anonymized, aggregated, and characterized using descriptive statistics. Thematic mapping of open text comments was performed by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: The response rate was 42% (215/508). Eighty-eight percent of respondents disapproved of the Dobbs ruling. Twenty percent of respondents (15% male/24% female) eliminated programs in states where abortion is illegal. Fifty-nine percent (51% male/70% female) would be concerned for their or their partner's health if they matched in a state where abortion was illegal, and 66% (55% male/82% female) would want their program to assist them or their partner if they required abortion care during residency. Due to the competitive nature of Urology, 68% of applicants reported feeling at least somewhat obligated to apply in states where abortion legislation conflicts with their beliefs. Of the 65 comments provided by respondents, 4 common themes emerged: (1) avoidance of states with restrictive abortion laws; (2) inability to limit applications because of the competitiveness of urology; (3) impacts on personal health care; and (4) desire for advocacy from professional urology organizations. CONCLUSION: The Dobbs ruling will impact the urology workforce by affecting urology applicants' decision-making regarding residency selection and ranking. Although the competitiveness of the Urology Match pressures applicants to apply broadly, many are taking reproductive health care access into consideration.

Practice Readiness? Trends in Chief Resident Year Training Experience Across 13 Residency Programs.

INTRODUCTION: Urology residency prepares trainees for independent practice. The optimal operative chief resident year experience to prepare for practice is undefined. We analyzed the temporal arc of cases residents complete during their residency compared to their chief year in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs of graduating residents from 2010 to 2022 from participating urology residency programs were aggregated. Resident data for 5 categorized index procedures were recorded: (1) general urology, (2) endourology, (3) reconstructive urology, (4) urologic oncology, and (5) pediatric urology. Interactions were tested between the trends for total case exposure in residency training relative to the chief resident year. RESULTS: From a sample of 479 resident graduates, a total of 1,287,433 total cases were logged, including 375,703 during the chief year (29%). Urologic oncology cases had the highest median percentage completed during chief year (56%) followed by reconstructive urology (27%), general urology (24%), endourology (17%), and pediatric urology (2%). Across the study period, all categories of cases had a downward trend in median percentage completed during chief year except for urologic oncology. However, only trends in general urology (slope of -0.68, P = .013) and endourology (slope of -1.71, P ≤ .001) were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of cases completed by chief residents are urologic oncology procedures. Current declining trends indicate that residents are being exposed to proportionally fewer general urology and endourology cases during their chief year prior to entering independent practice.