Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.

Worry about breast cancer risk has been found to be a barrier to mammography use by women with a family history of breast cancer in some studies, although worry is generally found to increase mammography use among average risk women. Our study sought to examine the association of worry with mammography use in a population-based sample of women stratified by family history associated risk for breast cancer. A population-based sample of 6512 women completed a telephone interview. Fourteen percent (n = 948) of these reported a family history suggestive of elevated risk, including at least one affected first-degree relative. To examine the effects of worry on mammography use in women, a logistic regression model, including family history associated risk, age, and worry, was tested. Although family history was a significant predictor of mammography use in bivariate examinations, in the multivariate model it was not significant after adjustment for age and worry, which remained statistically significant predictors of mammography (P < 0.05). The association between worry and mammography use was best described by a quadratic term. Interaction terms for family history-associated risk and worry were not statistically significant predictors of mammography use. Worry about breast cancer risk appears to be associated with mammography use in an inverted u-shaped pattern. Women reporting moderate levels of worry were more likely to use mammography annually than those who were either mildly or severely worried. Severe worry may be a barrier to mammography use for all women not only those with a family history.

Dispatcher assistance and automated external defibrillator performance among elders.

OBJECTIVES: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) provide an opportunity to improve survival in out-of-hospital, ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest by enabling laypersons not trained in rhythm recognition to deliver lifesaving therapy. The potential role of emergency dispatchers in the layperson use of AEDs is uncertain. This study was performed to examine whether dispatcher telephone assistance affected AED skill performance during a simulated VF cardiac arrest among a cohort of older adults. The hypothesis was that dispatcher assistance would increase the proportion who were able to correctly deliver a shock, but might require additional time. METHODS: One hundred fifty community-dwelling persons aged 58-84 years were recruited from eight senior centers in King County, Washington. All participants had received AED training approximately six months previously. For this study, the participants were randomized to AED operation with or without dispatcher assistance during a simulated VF cardiac arrest. The proportions who successfully delivered a shock and the time intervals from collapse to shock were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The participants who received dispatcher assistance were more likely to correctly deliver a shock with the AED during the simulated VF cardiac arrest (91% vs 68%, p = 0.001). Among those who were able to deliver a shock, the participants who received dispatcher assistance required a longer time interval from collapse to shock [median (25th, 75th percentile) = 193 seconds (165, 225) for dispatcher assistance, and 148 seconds (138, 166) for no dispatcher assistance, p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Among older laypersons previously trained in AED operation, dispatcher assistance may increase the proportion who can successfully deliver a shock during a VF cardiac arrest.

Awareness of genetic testing for breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer: effect of women's information sources on their awareness.

The purpose of this study was to relate women's awareness of breast cancer risk genetic testing to the sources of information used by women for obtaining information about breast health. A sample of 354 women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer was interviewed. Study variables included women's information sources for breast health, personal risk perceptions, family history of breast cancer, personal experience (i.e., having had a biopsy), awareness of genetic testing, and demographic variables. Regression analyses were conducted to assess the relationships among the variables. Only approximately one-third of the study participants were moderately aware of genetic testing for breast cancer risk. The Internet Web was the only information source significantly related to awareness of genetic testing. Having had a biopsy, being more highly educated, and being married also were significant predictors of awareness of genetic testing. Study participants were not uniformly aware of genetic testing. If the diffusion of Web technology continues, the Web may be a promising source for increasing awareness on genetic testing for breast cancer risk.

Training seniors in the operation of an automated external defibrillator: a randomized trial comparing two training methods.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the differences in efficacy of 2 methods for training seniors in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). We tested the hypothesis that each training method (face-to-face instruction compared with video-based instruction) would result in similar AED performance on a manikin. METHODS: Two hundred ten seniors from various senior centers were randomized to receive face-to-face or video-based instruction on AED skills. Seniors were assessed individually and tested on the speed and quality of AED performance. We retested 177 of these initial trainees 3 months after initial training. Similar performance measures were assessed. RESULTS: Although there were statistically significant differences between the 2 training methods in terms of average time to shock at both evaluations, the results in general demonstrate that there were no clinically meaningful distinctions (time differences of <20 seconds) between the AED performance of seniors trained with a video and seniors trained in a face-to-face setting at the initial training or at the retention assessment. At the initial evaluation, overall performance was satisfactory, with greater than 98% trained with either method delivering a shock. However, at the 3-month follow-up, almost one fourth of trainees were not able to deliver a shock, and almost half were not able to correctly place the pads on the manikin. CONCLUSION: We believe that seniors can be trained equally well in AED performance with video-based self-instruction or face-to-face instruction. How to maintain acceptable AED performance skills over time remains a challenge.

Barriers and facilitators to the prescription of automated external defibrillators for home use in patients with heart disease: a survey of cardiologists.

OBJECTIVE: Because the majority of cardiac arrests occur at home, the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in the home could potentially improve survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Currently, physicians must prescribe AEDs for home use by patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to prescription of home use of AEDs. DESIGN: Telephone interviews were conducted with 85 cardiologists and paper and pencil surveys (via fax) with 59 additional cardiologists in Washington State. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiologists were asked about their current practices and their perceived barriers and facilitators to prescription of AEDs for home use. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of the sample believed that AEDs could be effective in preventing death, although only 7% of the cardiologists had ever prescribed an AED. Reasons for nonprescription included the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators, perceived lack of a clear patient niche, and lack of knowledge about the device. The majority of respondents reported that they would be more likely to prescribe AEDs if they were the standard of care (71%), were covered by insurance (67%), and came with comprehensive training (58%). CONCLUSION: The results showed that cardiologists believe that home use of AEDs can be effective but that many issues regarding the prescription of AEDs remain.

Factors that influence personal perceptions of the risk of an acute myocardial infarction.

Personal risk perceptions of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) affect people's preventive health behaviors as well as their beliefs during a heart attack episode. The authors investigated factors that are associated with personal risk perceptions of having an AMI. A random-digit-dial survey was conducted among 1294 respondents, aged 18 years or older, in 20 communities across the nation as part of the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) trial. Results of two mixed-model linear regression analyses suggested that worse perceived general health, more risk factors, and greater knowledge were associated with greater perception of AMI risk. The results also showed that women who answered, incorrectly, that heart disease is not the most common cause of death for women in the United States reported significantly lower risk perceptions than women who answered this question correctly. The findings in this study suggest that interventions need to target specific misconceptions regarding AMI risk.

The 'Heart Attack Survival Kit' project: an intervention designed to increase seniors' intentions to respond appropriately to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a 'Heart Attack Survival Kit', disseminated via two different delivery methods, designed to increase seniors' intentions to call 911 and take an aspirin in response to a cardiac emergency. Twelve-hundred seniors were randomly assigned to (1) receiving a Kit via a home visit by an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT), (2) receiving a Kit via direct mail or (3) a control group. All participants were telephoned and asked how they would respond to a cardiac emergency. Results showed that respondents in the intervention group (EMT and direct mail group combined) reported a greater frequency of the recommended coping response to AMI (39%) than respondents in the control group (10%) (P < 0.000). Within intervention groups, 47% in the EMT group and 30% in the direct mail group (P < 0.000) reported intentions to take the appropriate response to AMI. The results suggest that a Heart Attack Survival Kit, especially when delivered door-to-door by EMTs, can be an effective way of educating seniors about cardiac emergencies.

Patient delay in seeking care for heart attack symptoms: findings from focus groups conducted in five U.S. regions.

BACKGROUND: Patient delay in seeking health care for heart attack symptoms is a continuuing problem in the United States. METHODS: Investigators conducted focus groups (N = 34; 207 participants) in major U.S. regions (NE, NW, SE, SW, MW) as formative evaluation to develop a multi-center randomized community trial (the REACT Project). Target groups included adults with previous heart attacks, those at higher risk for heart attack, and bystanders to heart attacks. There were also subgroups reflecting gender and ethnicity (African-American, Hispanic-American, White). FINDINGS: Patients, bystanders, and those at higher risk expected heart attack symptoms to present as often portrayed in the movies, that is, as sharp, crushing chest pain rather than the more common onset of initially ambiguous but gradually increasing discomfort. Patients and those at higher risk also unrealistically judge their personal risk as low, understand little about the benefits of rapid action, are generally unaware of the benefits of using EMS/9-1-1 over alternative transport, and appear to need the "permission" of health care providers or family to act. Moreover, participants reported rarely discussing heart attack symptoms and appropriate responses in advance with health care providers, spouses, or family members. Women often described heart attack as a "male problem," an important aspect of their underestimation of personal risk. African-American participants were more likely to describe negative feelings about EMS/9-1-1, particularly whether they would be transported to their hospital of choice. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce patient delay need to address expectations about heart attack symptoms, educate about benefits and appropriate actions, and provide legitimacy for taking specific health care-seeking actions. In addition, strategy development must emphasize the role of health care providers in legitimizing the need and importance of taking rapid action in the first place.

Meeting the needs of rural breast cancer survivors: what still needs to be done?

As screening and treatment for breast cancer improve, learning about survivors' post-treatment needs becomes increasingly important. Focus groups (n = 23) were conducted with breast cancer survivors (n = 128) in rural Washington communities during a 5-month period in 1996 to explore ways to improve the lives of rural breast cancer survivors and to expand existing knowledge of breast cancer survivorship. Survivors reported positive and negative outcomes of their cancer experience. Results indicate that the needs of many women with breast cancer, particularly women diagnosed with late-stage disease, are not being met. Participants diagnosed with late-stage cancer were more likely than participants diagnosed with early-stage cancer to comment about being treated poorly by the medical system and to voice a need for increased support and educational services for breast cancer patients. Rural survivors, regardless of stage at diagnosis, reported needing more education about breast cancer and more emotional support after diagnosis. Further efforts to facilitate support and education within the context of medical care and to improve patient-clinician relationships are needed.

Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) study.

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89%; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23%, with significant geographic differences (range, 10% to 48% use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.

The emergency department experience of chest pain patients and their intention to delay care seeking for acute myocardial infarction.

This study investigated how patients' emergency department experience was related to their intention to delay action in response to future symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. A sample of 426 persons admitted to the emergency department with a chief complaint of chest pain and released from the emergency department were contacted by telephone. Patients were queried about their affective response to the emergency department experience, their satisfaction with emergency department staff communication, their intention to delay prompt action for acute myocardial infarction symptoms in the future, the influence of others in the decision to seek care, and medical and demographic status. The results of a mixed model linear regression analysis showed that the less education patients had (p = 0.007), the less sure they felt that going to the emergency department had been "the right thing to do" (p = 0.004), and the greater the degree of embarrassment (p = 0.0001), the greater was the intention to delay action for future symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. The results also showed that those patients who were prompted by health professionals to go to the emergency department were less likely to report intentions to delay for future symptoms (p = 0.036). It is important that emergency department staff reassure chest pain patients who are sent home that they did the right thing by coming to the emergency department for their symptoms. Providers need to be particularly sensitive to feelings of embarrassment.

The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities.

INTRODUCTION: The Community Trial of Mammography Promotion assessed the effectiveness of mammography promotion by community volunteer groups in rural areas. Three interventions were tested. One used an individual counseling strategy, one used a community activities strategy, and a third combined the two strategies. METHODS: The effects of the interventions were tested by randomizing 40 communities either to the study interventions or to a control group. A cohort of 352 women from each community was randomly selected and used to evaluate the interventions' effectiveness. Of these, 6592 women were eligible for screening mammography at baseline and follow-up and were successfully interviewed prior to and after study intervention activities. RESULTS: Although the interventions did not significantly increase women's overall use of mammography, the community activities intervention increased use at follow-up by regular users over baseline by 2.9% (p = 0.01). Intervention appears to have increased the use of mammography among certain groups of women who were not regular users at baseline, including those in communities without female physicians (10% to 16%; p < 0.05), and among women with no health insurance (10% to 23%; p

The impact of television public service announcements on the rate of bystander CPR.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether televised public service announcements (PSAs) demonstrating the fundamentals of CPR were effective in increasing the rate of layperson bystander-initiated CPR. METHODS: Two 30-second PSAs were shown 597 times from September 8, 1996, through April 12, 1997. In each, CPR was given to one member of an older couple by the other in the home. The authors measured rates of bystander CPR in communities that were exposed to the PSA and in communities that were not exposed in two time periods, a before-airing period, January 1, 1993, through September 7, 1996, and a during-airing period, September 8, 1996, through April 12, 1997. A case was defined as a patient with a nontraumatic cardiac arrest that occurred before arrival of EMS personnel, and for whom CPR was initiated by EMS personnel or lay bystanders. RESULTS: There were 1,786 cardiac arrests in the "before" period and 289 in the "during" period. The rate of bystander CPR increased from 43% to 55% (p<0.05) in the intervention community and remained the same in the comparison community (33%). CONCLUSION: Airing of the PSA was accompanied by an increase in the rate of bystander CPR, though the increase may be attributable to a secular trend.

Health care providers' perspectives on patient delay for seeking care for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction.

To inform intervention development in a multisite randomized community trial, the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) project formative research was undertaken for the purpose of investigating the knowledge, beliefs, perceptions, and usual practice of health care professionals. A total of 24 key informant interviews of cardiologists and emergency physicians and 15 focus groups (91 participants) were conducted in five major geographic regions: Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, Southwest, and Midwest. Transcript analyses revealed that clinicians are somewhat unaware of the empirical evidence related to the problem of patient delay, are concerned about the practice constraints they face, and would benefit from concrete suggestions about how to improve patient education and encourage fast action. Findings provide guidance for selection of educational strategies and messages for health providers as well as patients and the public.

REACT theory-based intervention to reduce treatment-seeking delay for acute myocardial infarction. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of mortality in the U.S. Innovations in reperfusion therapies can potentially reduce CHD morbidity and mortality associated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) when treatment is initiated within the first few hours of symptom onset. However, delay in seeking treatment for AMI is unacceptably lengthy, resulting in most patients being ineligible for reperfusion therapies. The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial is a four-year, 20-community, randomized trial to design and test the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention to reduce patient delay for hospital care-seeking for AMI symptoms. This manuscript describes the development and content of the theoretically-based REACT intervention and summarizes: (1) the research literature used to inform the intervention; (2) the behavioral theories used to guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of the intervention; (3) the formative research undertaken to understand better decision-making processes as well as barriers and facilitators to seeking medical care as perceived by AMI patients, their families, and medical professionals; (4) the intervention design issues that were addressed; (5) the synthesis of data sources in developing the core message content; (6) the conceptualization for determining the intervention target audiences and associated intervention components and strategies, their integration with guiding theoretical approaches and implementation theories for the study, and a description of major intervention materials developed to implement the intervention; and (7) the focus of the outcome, impact, and process measurement based on the intervention components and theories on which they were developed.

How women label and respond to symptoms of acute myocardial infarction: responses to hypothetical symptom scenarios.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how women label and intend to respond to common and less common symptoms of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Telephone interviews were conducted with 862 women older than age 50 years in the state of Washington. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intended coping strategies, labeling of hypothetical symptoms, perceived risk of AMI, knowledge of AMI symptoms, medical and family history of AMI and demographics. RESULTS: Women who labeled common or less common symptoms as a heart attack (65% and 36%, respectively) were more likely to report they would call 911 or go to a hospital right away than women who labeled these symptoms as something else. The results of a multiple logistic regression analysis suggests that knowledge of less common AMI symptoms, AMI information seeking, and personal risk perceptions were significant predictors of labeling less common symptoms as a heart attack. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that many women might be in danger of mislabeling their symptoms and not taking appropriate action. Women need to be educated about the less common symptoms of AMI and need to be encouraged to seek out information regarding AMI.

What can you teach about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in 30 seconds? Evaluation of a television campaign.

This study evaluated an 8-month media campaign, implemented in western Washington, to educate people on the basic steps of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for cardiac arrest. A telephone survey was conducted with a total of 384 adults randomly selected from two towns, one that had been exposed to the campaign (intervention town) and one that had not been exposed to the campaign (comparison town). Results showed that respondents in the intervention town were more likely than respondents in the comparison town to report (a) having heard messages on CPR in the past month, (b) having seen the CPR media campaign, and (c) knowing the three basic steps of CPR. Respondents who had seen the campaign evaluated it very favorably. There were no differences between respondent groups in self-reported CPR training or intentions to perform CPR, suggesting that the campaign had a greater impact on knowledge and awareness than on intentions and behavior.

Prevalence of aspirin use among patients calling 9-1-1 for chest pain.

OBJECTIVE: Early aspirin administration during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) decreases morbidity and mortality. This investigation examined the extent to which patients with a complaint of chest pain, the symptom most identified with AMI by the general population, self-administer aspirin before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional prevalence study, data were derived through the analysis of EMS incident reports for patients with a complaint of chest pain from June 1, 1997, to August 31, 1997. RESULTS: The study included 694 subjects. One hundred two (15%) took aspirin for their chest pain before the arrival of EMS personnel. Of the 322 subjects who reported taking aspirin on a regular basis, 82 (26%) took additional aspirin for their acute chest pain. Only 20 (5%) of the 370 patients who were not using regular aspirin therapy self-administered aspirin acutely (p<0.001). In addition, patients with lower intensity of chest pain (p = 0.03) were more likely to take aspirin for their chest pain. CONCLUSION: Only a relatively small fraction of individuals calling 9-1-1 with acute chest pain take aspirin prior to the arrival of EMS personnel. These individuals are more likely to self-administer aspirin if they are already taking it on a regular basis. It is also possible that they are less likely to take aspirin if their chest pain is more severe.

Knowledge of heart attack symptoms in a population survey in the United States: The REACT Trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Greater use of thrombolysis for patients with myocardial infarction has been limited by patient delay in seeking care for heart attack symptoms. Deficiencies in knowledge of symptoms may contribute to delay and could be a target for intervention. We sought to characterize symptom knowledge. METHODS: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment is a community trial designed to reduce this delay. At baseline, a random-digit dialed survey was conducted among 1294 adult respondents in the 20 study communities. Two open-ended questions were asked about heart attack symptom knowledge. RESULTS: Chest pain or discomfort was reported as a symptom by 89.7% of respondents and was thought to be the most important symptom by 56.6%. Knowledge of arm pain or numbness (67.3%), shortness of breath (50.8%), sweating (21.3%), and other heart attack symptoms was less common. The median number of correct symptoms reported was 3 (of 11). In a multivariable-adjusted model, significantly higher mean numbers of correct symptoms were reported by non-Hispanic whites than by other racial or ethnic groups, by middle-aged persons than by older and younger persons, by persons with higher socioeconomic status than by those with lower, and by persons with previous experience with heart attack than by those without. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of chest pain as an important heart attack symptom is high and relatively uniform; however, knowledge of the complex constellation of heart attack symptoms is deficient in the US population, especially in low socioeconomic and racial or ethnic minority groups. Efforts to reduce delay in seeking medical care among persons with heart attack symptoms should address these deficiencies in knowledge.

Assessment of chest pain onset and out-of-hospital delay using standardized interview questions: the REACT Pilot Study. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency of responses to a standardized 2-part "key" question (Key-Q) about acute symptom onset in patients presenting with chest pain when measured using alternative questions (Qs) about symptom perception and decisions to seek treatment. METHODS: A structured patient interview was performed at 3 university teaching hospitals and 1 community hospital. Convenience samples of adult patients presenting to these EDs with chest pain were asked specific questions related to their symptoms and recognition of illness. Information obtained included the 2-part Key-Q: "What are the symptoms that brought you here today?" and "When did those symptoms start?" The alternative Qs (in order of use) were as follows: Q1 = "When did your very first symptom or sensation begin?"; Q2 = "When did your symptoms lead you to think something was wrong or that you were ill?"; Q3 = "When did your symptoms become serious enough for you to seek medical care?"; and Q4 = "When did you actually call 9-1-1/emergency medical services (EMS) or go to the hospital?" The documented ED arrival time, demographic variables, and whether the patient arrived by ambulance were obtained from the medical record. Patients also were queried regarding potential barriers to seeking medical care and their cardiac risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 135 patients surveyed, 9 were unsure of the date and time of symptom onset. For the 126 patients with analyzable data, the mean (+/- SD) patient age was 62 +/- 16 years, and 59% were male. The general sequence of events reported from acute symptom onset until hospital care was Q1/Key-Q-->Q2-->Q3-->Q4-->ED arrival. The median differences and interquartile ranges (IQRs) in minutes between Q times and the Key-Q response were: Q1 = 0 (0-0); Q2 = 30 (0-210); Q3 = 140 (30-720); Q4 = 265 (90-1,215); and ED arrival = 340 (120-1,230). The interval from the Key-Q response until calling 9-1-1/EMS or going to the hospital was shorter for those who used an ambulance and for those who did not consult a physician first. The interval from the Key-Q response until considering symptoms to be serious was shorter for those with a family history of heart disease, but longer for non-white patients. CONCLUSION: The Key-Q elicited a response recalled near the time of first symptoms and generally before the patient had concluded something was "wrong or that he or she was ill." Measurement of the out-of-hospital delay in chest pain patients using the Key-Q appears promising.