Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Angiol ; 43(2): 262-270, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38454886

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To estimate the impact of anesthetic conduct, alone and in combination with the type of femoral access, on early results after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A retrospective multicenter analysis on patients undergoing elective standard EVAR at four academic centers was performed. Patients undergoing the procedure through either local or general anesthesia were compared. Comparative subanalyses of the two groups were performed for the type of femoral access to evaluate further impact on outcomes. RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-four patients underwent elective standard EVAR, of which 207 (39.5%) under general anesthesia and 317 (60.5%) under local anesthesia. Patients who underwent general anesthesia had higher 30-day mortality rates (3.4% vs. 0.3%, P=0.005), as well as slightly worse 30-day major systemic complication rates (8.2% vs. 5.4%, P=0.195). There were no differences in terms of reinterventions (2.1% vs. 2.5%, P=0.768) and aneurysm-related mortality (0% vs. 0.4%, P=0.422) at one year. Total intervention times were significantly longer in the general anesthesia group (126 vs. 89 minutes, P=0.001), as well as the total length of hospital stay (7.6 vs. 5.3 days, P=0.007). At subanalyses, the combination of local anesthesia with bilateral percutaneous femoral access further improved 30-day outcomes and determined an additional reduction in total intervention times and ICU stays. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR performed under local anesthesia has a significantly better impact on early results when compared to general anesthesia. Combining percutaneous bilateral femoral access to local anesthesia reduced procedural times, ICU stays and consequently improved early results.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Anestesia Local , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Arteria Femoral , Tiempo de Internación , Humanos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Anestesia General/mortalidad , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas
2.
J Endovasc Ther ; : 15266028241240900, 2024 Mar 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38533777

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Endovascular repair of chronic post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (PD-TAAA) presents specific technical challenges due to the presence of chronic septum. Small true lumen diameter and false lumen visceral vessel origin can make branched endograft prohibitive. Septotomy may allow to overcome these challenges in cases of high complex anatomy. TECHNIQUE: We describe the application of electrocautery septotomy to the visceral aorta segment to deploy an off-the-shelf branched endograft in a chronic PD-TAAA rupture with true lumen collapse. CONCLUSIONS: Electrocautery septotomy can be an effective adjunctive technique to facilitate branched endograft, overcoming technical challenges associated with the endovascular treatment of chronic PD-TAAA. CLINICAL IMPACT: Electrocautery septotomy is an adjunctive technique that can facilitate endovascular treatment of post-dissection thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. By creating a common lumen, this technique might reduce the number of re-interventions associated with PD-TAAA endovascular exclusion.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA