Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 225(3): 308.e1-308.e14, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33823150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In women with late preterm preeclampsia, the optimal time for delivery remains a controversial topic, because of the fine balance between the maternal benefits from early delivery and the risks for prematurity. It remains challenging to define prognostic markers to identify women at highest risk for complications, in which case a selective, planned delivery may reduce the adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This trial aimed to determine whether using an algorithm based on the maternal levels of placental growth factor in women with late preterm preeclampsia to evaluate the best time for delivery reduced the progression to preeclampsia with severe features without increasing the adverse perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This parallel-group, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 7 maternity units across Spain. We compared selective planned deliveries based on maternal levels of placental growth factor at admission (revealed group) and expectant management under usual care (concealed group) with individual randomization in singleton pregnancies with late preterm preeclampsia from 34 to 36+6 weeks' gestation. The coprimary maternal outcome was the progression to preeclampsia with severe features. The coprimary neonatal outcome was morbidity at infant hospital discharge with a noninferiority hypothesis (noninferiority margin of 10% difference in incidence). Analyses were conducted according to intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, 178 women were recruited. Of those women, 88 were assigned to the revealed group and 90 were assigned to the concealed group. The data analysis was performed before the completion of the required sample size. The proportion of women with progression to preeclampsia with severe features was significantly lower in the revealed group than in the concealed group (adjusted relative risk, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.76; P=.001). The proportion of infants with neonatal morbidity was not significantly different between groups (adjusted relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-1.53; P=.45). CONCLUSION: There is evidence to suggest that the use of an algorithm based on placental growth factor levels in women with late preterm preeclampsia leads to a lower rate of progression to preeclampsia with severe features and reduces maternal complications without worsening the neonatal outcomes. This trade-off should be discussed with women with late preterm preeclampsia to allow shared decision making about the timing of delivery.


Asunto(s)
Factor de Crecimiento Placentario/sangre , Preeclampsia/sangre , Adulto , Algoritmos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Pronóstico , Espera Vigilante
2.
J Obstet Gynaecol ; 40(6): 767-771, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32648534

RESUMEN

To assess the opinion and the level of satisfaction of patients concerning analgesia during external cephalic version (ECV), we present the results of a survey of 120 women undergoing ECV at term during a randomised controlled trial (July 2012 to February 2013) comparing remifentanil and nitrous oxide. Overall, 110 (91.7%) women said they would repeat the procedure and 111 (92.5%) that they would recommend it to another pregnant woman, with no significant differences by type of analgesia. The administration and sense of comfort were rated better in the remifentanil group (p < .01). In conclusion, the use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? ECV is commonly a painful manoeuvre for the woman. This pain triggers maternal reactive abdominal muscle contraction and involuntary abdominal tensing, reducing the likelihood of successful version and causing some women to reject the technique.What do the results of this study add? The use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women. The sense of comfort during ECV was also significantly better in the remifentanil group, probably because of its greater analgesic power and greater comfort during its administration.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? ECV should be carried out under analgesia, when available, not only to decrease pain but also to encourage wider adoption of the technique and enable more women to benefit from it.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia Obstétrica/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/psicología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Versión Fetal/psicología , Adulto , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Presentación de Nalgas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Óxido Nitroso/uso terapéutico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Embarazo , Remifentanilo/uso terapéutico , Nacimiento a Término/psicología , Versión Fetal/efectos adversos
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(7): e015548, 2020 04 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32248765

RESUMEN

Background There is little knowledge about the significance of extremely high values (>655) for the ratio of sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1) to PlGF (placental growth factor). We aim to describe the time-to-delivery interval and maternal and perinatal outcomes when such values are demonstrated while assessing suspected or confirmed placental dysfunction based on clinical or sonographic criteria. Methods and Results A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed on 237 singleton gestations between 20+0 and 37+0 weeks included at the time of first demonstrating a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >655. Clinicians were aware of this result, but standard protocols were followed for delivery indication. Main outcomes were compared for women with and without preeclampsia at inclusion. In those with preeclampsia (n=185, of whom 77.3% had fetal growth restriction), severe preeclampsia features and fetal growth restriction in stages III or IV were present in 49.2% and 13.5% cases, respectively, at inclusion and in 77.3% and 28.6% cases, respectively, at delivery. In the group without preeclampsia (n=52, 82.7% had fetal growth restriction), these figures were 0% and 30.8%, respectively, at inclusion and 21.2% and 50%, respectively, at delivery. Interestingly, 28% of women without initial preeclampsia developed it later. The median time to delivery was 4 days (interquartile range: 1-6 days) and 7 days (interquartile range: 3-12 days), respectively (P<0.01). Overall, perinatal mortality was 62.1% before 24 weeks; severe morbidity surpassed 50% before 29 weeks but became absent from 34 weeks. Maternal serious morbidity was high at any gestational age. Conclusions An sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >655 is almost invariably associated with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction that progresses rapidly. In our tertiary care settings, we observed that maternal adverse outcomes were high throughout gestation, whereas perinatal adverse outcomes diminished as pregnancy advanced.


Asunto(s)
Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/sangre , Factor de Crecimiento Placentario/sangre , Preeclampsia/sangre , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/sangre , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Parto Obstétrico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/diagnóstico , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/mortalidad , Retardo del Crecimiento Fetal/fisiopatología , Humanos , Mortalidad Materna , Mortalidad Perinatal , Preeclampsia/diagnóstico , Preeclampsia/mortalidad , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España , Factores de Tiempo , Regulación hacia Arriba
4.
J Perinat Med ; 47(6): 625-630, 2019 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31141492

RESUMEN

Background Obesity in pregnancy is increasing worldwide, reaching epidemic proportions in many countries and frequently creating challenges for obstetricians. We conducted this study to assess the effects of maternal obesity on maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods A historical cohort study was performed on 16,609 women who delivered singleton babies in a 5-year period (2013-2017). Data were retrieved from the Cruces Perinatal Database (CPD) and only women whose prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) was known were included. Women were categorized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification: normal weight (BMI 20-24.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). Obstetric, perinatal and neonatal outcomes were compared, and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the normal-weight group as the reference. Results Compared to women of normal weight (n = 9778), obese women (n = 2207) had a higher risk of preeclampsia (aOR 2.199, 95% CI: 1.46-3.29), rectovaginal group B streptococcus colonization (aOR 1.299, 95% CI: 1.14-1.47), induction of labor (aOR 1.593, 95% CI: 1.44-1.75), cesarean section (aOR 2.755, 95% CI: 2.46-3.08), cesarean section in women with a history of cesarean delivery (aOR 1.409, 95% CI: 1.03-1.92), fetal weight ≥4000 g (aOR 2.090, 95% CI: 1.803-2.422) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (aOR 1.341, 95% CI: 1.12-1.59). No association was found with preterm birth (aOR 0.936, 95% CI: 0.77-1.13), stillbirth (aOR 0.921, 95% CI: 0.41-2.02) or neonatal mortality (aOR 2.205, 95% CI: 0.86-5.62). Conclusion Maternal obesity is associated with a higher risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Pregnancy in this population of women should be considered and managed as high risk.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Obesidad Materna , Preeclampsia/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido , Edad Materna , Obesidad Materna/diagnóstico , Obesidad Materna/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Embarazo de Alto Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Mortinato/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...