Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cirrhotic patients frequently undergo screening endoscopy for the presence of oesophageal varices (OV). In the future, this social and medical burden will increase due to the greater number of patients with chronic liver disease and their improved survival. In this study, our aims were (1) to identify clinical, biochemical, and ultrasonographic parameters which might non-invasively predict the presence of OV in patients with liver cirrhosis; (2) to evaluate the reproducibility of the obtained results in a different, although related, further group of patients; and (3) to assess the predictiveness of the identified rules in patients with compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: In the first part of the study we retrospectively evaluated the presence of OV in 145 cirrhotic patients, and in the second part we evaluated the reproducibility of the study results in a subsequent group of 121 patients. Finally, we evaluated these parameters in a subgroup of 145 patients with compensated disease. All 266 patients underwent a complete biochemical workup, upper digestive endoscopy, and ultrasonographic measurement of spleen bipolar diameter. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio was calculated for all patients. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of OV were 61% and 58% in the first and second groups of patients, respectively. In the first part of the study, we found that platelet count, spleen diameter, platelet count/spleen diameter ratio, and Child- Pugh class were significantly different among patients with or without OV, although the platelet count/spleen diameter ratio was the only parameter which was independently associated with the presence of OV in a multivariate analysis. A platelet count/spleen diameter ratio cut off value of 909 had 100% negative predictive value for a diagnosis of OV. This result was reproduced in the second group of patients as well as in patients with compensated disease. In a cost-benefit analysis, screening cirrhotic patients according to the "platelet count/spleen diameter ratio strategy" was far more cost effective compared with the "scope all strategy". CONCLUSIONS: The platelet count/spleen diameter ratio is the only parameter which is independently associated with the presence of OV, and its negative predictive value is reproducible. Its use is of value even in the subgroup of patients with compensated disease, and it is also cost effective.

Helicobacter pylori infection is not involved in the pathogenesis of either erosive or non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The majority of reflux patients have non-erosive reflux disease. AIM: To evaluate the influence of Helicobacter pylori on oesophageal acid exposure in patients with both non-erosive and erosive reflux disease and in a group of controls. The pattern and distribution of chronic gastritis were also assessed. METHODS: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients with symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease agreed to undergo both upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-h oesophageal pH-metry. Patients were grouped as H. pylori-positive or H. pylori-negative on the basis of both CLO-test and histology, and as cases with or without oesophagitis on the basis of endoscopy. The controls consisted of 19 subjects without reflux symptoms and with normal endoscopy and oesophageal pH-metry. RESULTS: H. pylori was positive in 35 patients (31%) and in six controls (31%); oesophagitis was found in 44 patients (39%) and non-erosive reflux disease in 68 (61%). The prevalence of chronic gastritis in the antrum and corpus was higher in H. pylori-positive than in H. pylori-negative patients (P < 0.001), but was more frequently mild (P < 0.001) than moderate or severe. The percentage total time the oesophageal pH < 4.0 was higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.008-0.001), but there was no difference between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients (12.3% vs. 12%, P = 0.43) or H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative controls (1.07% vs. 1.47%, P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori infection had the same prevalence in reflux patients and in controls. It did not affect oesophageal acid exposure, as there was no difference between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative individuals. The high prevalence of mild body gastritis in H. pylori-positive patients suggests that H. pylori eradication is unlikely to lead to gastric functional recovery, which might precipitate or worsen symptoms and lesions in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Circadian pattern of intragastric acidity in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD).

BACKGROUND: Most patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have non-erosive reflux disease. Proton pump inhibitors are less effective than expected in these patients, but no previous study has measured their 24-h gastric pH values. AIMS: To evaluate whether there are differences in 24-h intragastric acidity between reflux patients with and without oesophagitis and controls. The influence of Helicobacter pylori on the gastric pH of reflux patients was also assessed. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms who agreed to undergo endoscopy and 24-h pH-metry were recruited. Twenty-five (39%) had erosive oesophagitis and 38 (61%) did not. H. pylori was diagnosed by CLO test, histology and 13C-urea breath test. Gastric pH was also measured in 30 controls without digestive symptoms. RESULTS: H. pylori was found in seven of the 25 (28%) patients with oesophagitis and 14 of the 38 (37%) patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Oesophageal pH-metry was abnormal in 21 of the 25 (84%) patients with oesophagitis and in 32 of the 38 (84%) patients with non-erosive reflux disease. The median gastric pH did not differ between patients with and without oesophagitis or between them and controls during the 24 h (P = 0.8) and other time intervals (P = 0.2-0.4). The gastric pH did not differ between infected and non-infected patients with oesophagitis (P = 0.2-0.4) or non-erosive reflux disease (P = 0.3-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: The circadian pattern of intragastric acidity does not differ between patients with non-erosive reflux disease and oesophagitis. Moreover, the study confirms that H. pylori infection does not affect the gastric pH in either group of reflux patients.

Stool antigen assay (HpSA) is less reliable than urea breath test for post-treatment diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic yield of the stool antigen test (HpSA) in evaluating the results of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is controversial, but many studies have used only the 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) as a gold standard which has greatly reduced their relevance. AIM: To compare the reliability of HpSA and 13C-UBT in patients post-treatment using biopsy-based methods as reference tests. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive dyspeptic patients (42 male and 58 female; mean age, 56 +/- 18 years) were enrolled in our study. All patients were H. pylori positive on the basis of at least two biopsy-based methods, and underwent 1 week of treatment with various triple therapies. They were again endoscoped 4 weeks after completing therapy and six biopsy specimens were taken from the gastric antrum and corpus for rapid urease test, histology and culture. HpSA and 13C-UBT were also performed within 3 days of the second endoscopy. RESULTS: On the basis of biopsy-based tests, infection was eradicated in 77 patients but continued in 23. Three false negatives were observed with HpSA and two with 13C-UBT. In contrast, the number of false positives was significantly higher (P < 0.01) with HpSA than with 13C-UBT (nine vs. one), confirming the lower specificity of the former test. The overall accuracy of HpSA was 88% vs. 97% for 13C-UBT (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: HpSA has lower diagnostic value than 13C-UBT in the evaluation of the outcome of anti-H. pylori therapy. 13C-UBT remains the first-line diagnostic method to monitor eradication results. The use of HpSA should be reserved for those settings in which 13C-UBT is not available.

Comparison of the main oesophageal pathophysiological characteristics between short- and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus.

AIM: To assess the oesophageal manometric characteristics and 24-h pH profiles of patients with both short-segment and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus and compare them with those of patients with reflux oesophagitis and controls. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients who had undergone upper digestive endoscopy were recruited: 16 had short-segment Barrett's oesophagus, 13 had long-segment Barrett's oesophagus, 25 had grade III oesophagitis according to the Savary-Miller classification and 25 were used as controls. The diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus was based on the histological detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia, which extended < 3 cm into the oesophagus in patients with short-segment disease and > 3 cm in patients with long-segment disease. All subjects underwent oesophageal manometry and basal 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring. RESULTS: The lower oesophageal sphincter pressure was significantly lower in patients with reflux oesophagitis and short-segment and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus than in controls (P=0.0004-0.0001), but there was no difference among the three reflux groups. The peristaltic wave amplitude of patients with long-segment Barrett's oesophagus was significantly lower than that of controls (P=0.002) and patients with short-segment Barrett's oesophagus (P=0.02), but was no different from that of patients with reflux oesophagitis. The percentage of non-propagated wet swallows was significantly higher in patients with reflux oesophagitis and short-segment and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus when compared with that of controls (P=0.0004-0.0001). The total percentage of time the oesophagus was exposed to pH < 4.0 was significantly higher in patients with reflux oesophagitis and short-segment and long-segment Barrett's oesophagus (P=0.0001) than in controls, and was higher in patients with long-segment disease than in those with short-segment disease (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Long-segment Barrett's oesophagus is characterized by a greater impairment of peristaltic wave amplitude and a higher oesophageal acid exposure than is short-segment Barrett's oesophagus. However, both forms are linked to increased acid reflux.

Negative effect of ranitidine on the results of urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVES: In analogy with proton pump inhibitors, H2-antagonists may also be responsible for false-negative results on urea breath test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori. In this study we assessed the frequency and duration of false-negative urea breath tests in patients given different doses of ranitidine. METHODS: A total of 120 consecutive dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori on the basis of concomitant positive results of CLO-test, histology and urea breath test were recruited for this prospective, open, parallel-group study performed in an urban university gastroenterological clinic. They were randomized to receive an acute treatment with either ranitidine 300 mg once a day in the evening, ranitidine 300 mg once a day in the morning, ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d., or ranitidine 300 mg b.i.d. for 14 days. The urea breath test was performed on day 14 while patients were still taking ranitidine, and on day 21, 1 wk after completion of therapy. The test was repeated on day 28 in those patients who were still negative on day 21. Duplicate breath samples were collected after ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea plus citric acid. A delta value >5/1000 was considered positive. RESULTS: Of 118 patients infected with H. pylori, 15 (13%) had a negative urea breath test on day 14. The false-negative results were equally distributed among the four groups of ranitidine dosage. Nine of these patients reverted to positive at 7 days and the remaining six at 14 days after completion of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that ranitidine negatively affects the results of urea breath testing, independent of the given dosage. Patients undergoing this examination for H. pylori diagnosis should discontinue use of H2-antagonists 2 wk before testing.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on 24-hour gastric pH and duodenal gastric metaplasia.

Published data on the regression of the extent of duodenal gastric metaplasia (DGM) after the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and the normalization of the organism-induced alterations in gastric physiology are scanty and controversial. Therefore, we decided to assess the circadian pattern of gastric acidity and the degree of DGM before and one year after H. pylori eradication in a group of duodenal ulcer patients. Fifteen consecutive H. pylori-positive patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were recruited for this study. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection was based on CLO-test and histology, and DGM was assessed on four bulb biopsies taken before and one year after H. pylori eradication. At the same time, gastric pH was measured by 24-hr continuous intraluminal recording. H. pylori eradication was ascertained by means of concomitant negative CLO-test and histology performed both four weeks after the end of the eradicating treatment and at the one-year endoscopic control. After successful cure, all patients discontinued any antiulcer medication. The mean 24-hr gastric pH was 1.7 +/- 0.4 before and 1.6 +/- 0.4 after one year of H. pylori eradication (P = 0.75). DGM improved in three cases, worsened in four cases, and was unchanged in eight cases at the one-year control (P = 0.87). No correlation was found between 24-hr gastric pH and DGM (P = NS) both at baseline and one year after eradication. Our results show that neither circadian gastric acidity nor DGM change significantly one year after H. pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer patients. Thus, the disappearance of H. pylori infection does not determine any increase in gastric pH and any reversal of gastric-type epithelium in the duodenum.

Circadian gastric acidity and Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

A high prevalence of duodenal ulcer has been reported in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Data from previous studies on gastric acid secretion in these patients have provided conflicting results, and the potential role of H. pylori infection has been poorly investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the circadian pattern of gastric acidity and the prevalence of H. pylori infection in a group of patients suffering from this disease. Thirty-five patients with chronic pancreatitis ascertained by means of pancreatic calcifications or ductal alterations revealed by ERCP were recruited for this prospective study. They underwent 24-hr gastric pH-metry with glass minielectrodes positioned in the gastric corpus, and their profile of gastric acidity was compared with that of 35 healthy subjects, matched for age and sex. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by means of serology. There was no statistical difference (P = NS) in gastric pH of circadian, nocturnal, daytime, and postprandial periods between healthy subjects and patients with chronic pancreatitis. The prevalence of H. pylori infection was rather low (31%) in our patients and similar to that of a comparable control population (37%) in our geographical area. In conclusion, our study shows that patients with chronic pancreatitis have a circadian pattern of gastric acidity similar to that of normal subjects. Moreover, the prevalence of H. pylori infection is low in this population. These findings greatly differentiate the ulcer diathesis in chronic pancreatitis from that of patients with ordinary duodenal ulcer and suggest that other factors are implicated in the ulcerogenic process.

Comparative effects of levosulpiride and cisapride on gastric emptying and symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of several prokinetic drugs on dyspeptic symptoms and on gastric emptying rates are well-established in patients with functional dyspepsia, but formal studies comparing different prokinetic drugs are lacking. AIM: To compare the effects of chronic oral administration of cisapride and levosulpiride in patients with functional dyspepsia and delayed gastric emptying. METHODS: In a double-blind crossover comparison, the effects of a 4-week administration of levosulpiride (25 mg t.d.s.) and cisapride (10 mg t.d.s.) on the gastric emptying rate and on symptoms were evaluated in 30 dyspeptic patients with functional gastroparesis. At the beginning of the study and after levosulpiride or cisapride treatment, the gastric emptying time of a standard meal was measured by 13C-octanoic acid breath test. Gastrointestinal symptom scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: The efficacy of levosulpiride was similar to that of cisapride in significantly shortening (P < 0.001) the t1/2 of gastric emptying. No significant differences were observed between the two treatments with regards to improvements in total symptom scores. However, levosulpiride was significantly more effective (P < 0.01) than cisapride in improving the impact of symptoms on the patients' every-day activities and in improving individual symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and early postprandial satiety. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of levosulpiride and cisapride in reducing gastric emptying times with no relevant side-effects is similar. The impact of symptoms on patients' everyday activities and the improvement of some symptoms such as nausea, vomiting and early satiety was more evident with levosulpiride than cisapride.

Effect of gastric acid suppression on 13C-urea breath test: comparison of ranitidine with omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of the effect of H2 antagonists on the results of the urea breath test has produced controversial results. AIM: To assess whether standard doses of both omeprazole and H2 blockers can adversely influence the accuracy of the urea breath test. METHODS: Sixty dyspeptic patients with ascertained Helicobacter pylori infection were recruited for this prospective, open study. They were randomized to receive either omeprazole 20 mg at 08:00 hours (n = 30) or ranitidine 300 mg at 22:00 hours (n = 30) for 14 days. The urea breath test was performed at baseline, on day 14, while patients were still taking the antisecretory drugs, and on day 21, 1 week after their cessation. Duplicate breath samples were collected after ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea + citric acid. A delta value > 5 per thousand was considered positive. RESULTS: On day 14 the median delta values had declined, but not significantly (P = 0. 07) compared to baseline (13.79 vs. 22.39) with omeprazole, while they had increased (P = 0.27) with ranitidine (27.21 vs. 19.46). On the same day there were five out of 30 (17%) and five out of 28 (18%) false-negative results in the omeprazole and ranitidine groups, respectively. All these cases became positive again on day 21. However, in eight cases treated with omeprazole and 13 treated with ranitidine, there was an increase of 14-day delta values compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that both omeprazole and ranitidine at standard doses are able to negatively affect the results of the urea breath test. Their adverse effect resolves within 7 days of drug cessation and therefore the withdrawal of these drugs 7 days before testing seems to be sufficient to avoid false-negative results. The surprising finding that both antisecretory drugs reduce delta values in one group and increase them in another group of patients deserves further study.

Comparison of isotope ratio mass spectrometry and nondispersive isotope-selective infrared spectroscopy for 13C-urea breath test.

OBJECTIVES: The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is a sensitive and noninvasive method to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection, but mass spectrometry (IRMS) is very expensive. The aims of this study were to compare the new low-priced infrared spectroscopy with IRMS in detecting the infection and to assess the influence of feeding on test accuracy. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients with dyspeptic symptoms were recruited. Of these, 74 were infected and 60 uninfected on the basis of both CLO-test and histology. A subgroup of 37 patients (22 H. pylori-positive and 15 H. pylori-negative) was studied under fasting and nonfasting conditions on two different days. Duplicate breath samples were analyzed with two IRMS systems (Breath Mat and ABCA) and an infrared spectrometer (IRIS) before, 15 min, and 30 min after ingestion of 75 mg 13C-urea with citric acid. In 37 patients the test was repeated the day after the fasted one and was performed 60 min after a meal of 800 Kcal. RESULTS: There was a close correlation between IRIS and Breath Mat (r = 0.969 at 15 min and r = 0.977 at 30 min; p < 0.0001), IRIS and ABCA (r = 0.963 at 15 min and r = 0.985 at 30 min; p < 0.0001), and Breath Mat and ABCA (r = 0.987 at 15 min and r = 0.981 at 30 min; p = 0.0001). The sensitivity ranged from 97-100% at both times with all devices, although the specificity was slightly inferior with the infrared system than with the two IRMS machines (95% vs 98-100% at 30 min), but the difference was not significant (p = NS). Food intake produced three false negative results in all three machines and a systematic shift to lower 6 values in infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Infrared spectroscopy can be considered a valid alternative to mass spectroscopy for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. Fasting is required to guarantee an accurate test.

Head-to-head comparison of 1-week triple regimens combining ranitidine or omeprazole with two antibiotics to eradicate Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies containing omeprazole and ranitidine have been shown to be equivalent in eradicating H. pylori infection, but have been assessed either separately or head-to-head, only in small trials. AIM: To carry out a large randomized controlled study comparing omeprazole and ranitidine combined with two antibiotic combinations for 1 week. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive patients were randomly subdivided into four equal-sized groups and received one of the following treatments: OAM = omeprazole 20 mg b.d. + amoxycillin 1 g b.d. + metronidazole 500 mg b.d.; RAM = ranitidine 300 mg b.d. + amoxycillin 1 g b.d. + metronidazole 500 mg b.d.; OAC = omeprazole 20 mg b.d. + amoxycillin 1 g b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg t.d.s.; RAC = ranitidine 300 mg b.d. + amoxycillin 1 g b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg t.d.s. The assessment of H. pylori status was performed before and 4 weeks after the end of therapy by means of CLO-test and histology. H. pylori infection was considered to be eradicated when both tests were negative. RESULTS: OAM and RAM eradicated H. pylori in 89% and 85% of cases on per protocol (P = 0.48) and in 77% and 75% of cases on intention-to-treat analyses (P = 0.71). OAC and RAC eradicated H. pylori in 67% and 70% of cases on per protocol (P = 0.68) and in 57% and 64% of cases on intention-to-treat analyses (P = 0.41). In contrast, there was significant difference between OAM and OAC (P<0.01) and between RAM and RAC (P<0.05). Side-effects occurred in 15%, 10%, 17% and 16% of patients with respect to the above four subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole and ranitidine combined with two antibiotics for 1 week are equally effective in the eradication of H. pylori infection, and these results question the role of profound acid suppression in the eradication of the bacterium.

Histological and functional recovery in patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric histology and physiology in patients with multifocal atrophic gastritis over 1-year period. PATIENTS: Fourteen consecutive patients with histological evidence of chronic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosed by histology and serology entered this study. Patients with pernicious anaemia, gastric ulcer or carcinoma, duodenal ulcer, reflux oesophagitis and regular intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded. METHODS: Patients underwent triple anti-Helicobacter treatment for one week, which resulted successful in all subjects on the basis of negative CLO test and histology as well as 50% decrease in IgG antibodies after 4 weeks and 6 months of treatment, respectively. Histological and functional investigations were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Histological assessment of inflammatory cell infiltrates was performed on multiple biopsy specimens of the corpus and fundus. Functional tests were 24-hour continuous gastric pH-metry, fasting serum gastrin assay and pepsinogen I levels. RESULTS: There was a progressive significant improvement (p < 0.01-0.001) in acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltrates in the gastric mucosa throughout the 12-month period. Functional recovery with increase in gastric acidity (p < 0.01) and decrease in gastrin and pepsinogen I levels (p < 0.001) was more evident at the 6-month than at the 12-month checkpoint after Helicobacter pylori eradication (p = NS for gastric pH and p < 0.02 for the other two variables) between 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection significantly improves the inflammatory status of oxyntic mucosa and this promotes an almost complete functional recovery. However, the non-parallel behaviour of gastric acidity, which was maximal at 6-month checkpoint, and histological parameters which continued to improve throughout the entire 12-month observation period, seems to indicate that removal of acid-inhibitory substances induced by Helicobacter pylori infection was also responsible for the more rapid recovery of gastric secretory function.

Optimal duration of therapy combining ranitidine bismuth citrate with clarithromycin and metronidazole in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) co-prescribed with clarithromycin and metronidazole for 1 week has been shown to be an effective eradicating regimen for Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To determine the optimal duration of this regimen. METHODS: A series of 165 dyspeptic patients were recruited for this randomized, open, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into three groups receiving RBC 400 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for three different periods (4, 7 and 10 days). H. pylori infection was assessed by the concomitant positivity of CLO-test and histology performed at the pre-entry endoscopy. The bacterium was considered eradicated on the basis of a negative 13C-urea breath test performed at least 28 days after the completion of treatment. RESULTS: The three subgroups were well matched and 16 patients dropped out of the study for many reasons (six in the 4-day, five in the 7-day and five in the 10-day treatment regimens). Intention-to-treat cure rates were 60%, 84% and 85%, and the per-protocol rates 67%, 92% and 94% in the 4-day, 7-day and 10-day treatment regimens, respectively. There was a significant difference, P = 0.003-0.006 on intention-to-treat and P = 0.001-0. 002 on per protocol analysis between the 4-day and the 7-day and the 4-day and the 10-day periods, respectively. The 7-day and 10-day periods did not differ from each other. Side-effects were reported in 9%, 14% and 20% of the 4-, 7- and 10-day regimens. They led to stopping treatment in four cases (one in the 7-day and three in the 10-day period). There was no statistical difference among them. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the duration of RBC-based triple therapy to 4 days provides a low and unacceptable rate of H. pylori eradication. As there is no difference between 7 and 10 days of treatment, 1 week represents the optimal time period for this kind of treatment, based on RBC plus two antibiotics.

Effect of one-month treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on gastric pH of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The use of NSAIDs is strongly associated with peptic ulceration. The inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis with the consequent increase of gastric acidity is considered a possible mechanism. Therefore we decided to assess the effect of one-month treatment with NSAIDs on the circadian gastric pH of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. We studied 11 consecutive patients (one man and 10 women, median age 55, range 26-72 years) with confirmed RA. None was H. pylori positive. A 24-hr gastric pH recording was performed both in basal conditions and after one-month treatment with either indomethacin 150 mg/day (eight cases) or ketoprofen 300 mg/day (three cases). Only the 10 female patients were eligible for final analysis, and six matched healthy subjects not taking NSAIDs were used as control group. The number of 24-hr pH readings for various pH thresholds was calculated for both populations. The highest acid levels (pH < 3.0) did not differ between the two pH profiles of the control group (7440 vs 7391, P = NS), while they predominated after the one-month NSAID treatment (10,339 vs 11,440, P < 0.001) in RA patients. These findings show that there is an increased gastric acidity after one-month of treatment with NSAIDs in female patients with RA of recent onset. This may sustain the rationale of using antisecretory agents to prevent gastroduodenal ulcerations in these patients.

24-hour gastric pH and extent of duodenal gastric metaplasia in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastric metaplasia (GM) is essential to explain duodenal colonization by Helicobacter pylori. It seems to be acid induced but also occurs in H. pylori-positive patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD), who are not acid hypersecretors. The aim of this study was to assess the circadian gastric acidity of 47 patients with duodenal ulcers (DUs) and 32 patients with NUD, both H. pylori positive, and its correlation to duodenal GM extent. METHODS: H. pylori was detected by histology and CLOtest, and GM was diagnosed and graded on four bulb biopsy specimens. Each patient underwent 24-hour gastric pH-metry, and the relation between gastric pH and GM extent was assessed by factorial analysis. RESULTS: Gastric pH was greater in patients with NUD than in patients with DU during 24 hours, night and daytime (P < 0.03-0.005). Gastric pH differed significantly (P < 0.0002) in relation to GM extent between the two populations, whereas no difference was found among the pH values of GM degrees. A significant increase in 24-hour gastric pH was associated with greater GM in patients with DU, whereas the opposite occurred in patients with NUD (P < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The lower gastric acidity in patients with NUD than in patients with DU and the lack of correlation between gastric pH and the various GM degrees in the two H. pylori-positive populations suggest that gastric hyperacidity is not associated with duodenal GM.

A new 1-week therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: One-week triple regimens are currently the most recommended therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. No previous study has evaluated the efficacy of a short-term regimen combining ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics. METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients were recruited for this randomized, three-centre, open, parallel-group study. They were subdivided into two groups receiving either ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. (group A) or ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. + clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 250 mg q.d.s (group B) for 1 week. H. pylori infection was assessed by CLO-test and histology on both antral and corpus biopsies before and at least 4 weeks after the end of therapy. The bacterium was considered eradicated when both tests were negative. Eradication rates and the number of side-effects were evaluated in each group. The Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One patient with only CLO-test positivity was erroneously randomized to group B and four patients dropped out of the study (two in group A and two in group B), mainly because they refused the second endoscopy. In group A, H. pylori was eradicated in 31 of 36 patients (intention-to-treat = 86%; 95% CI = 71-95% and per protocol 31/34 = 91%; 95% CI = 76-98%). Side-effects occurred in 10 patients (27%) and they were generally mild. In group B, H. pylori was eradicated in 29 of 35 patients (intention-to-treat = 83%; 95% CI = 66-93%; and per protocol 29/33 = 88%; 95% CI = 72-97%). Seven patients (20%) complained of modest side-effects. There was no significant difference between the two treatment arms (P = N.S.): no severe adverse events occurred and none of the patients was withdrawn from the study because of them. CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin at low dosage and metronidazole in twice daily doses for 1 week is a short, effective and well-tolerated regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. These findings should provide the impetus for large-scale investigations.

Circadian gastric acidity in Helicobacter pylori positive ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum.

BACKGROUND: The presence of gastric metaplasia allows helicobacter pylori to colonise the duodenum and this condition is thought to be acquired as a response to acid hypersecretion. This functional disorder, however, is present only in a subgroup of duodenal ulcer patients and, in addition, surface gastric metaplasia has been frequently found in the proximal duodenum of normal subjects and patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, who cannot be certainly considered as acid hypersecretors. AIMS: To clarify the role of acid in inducing gastric type epithelium in the duodenum. This study aimed at assessing whether the pattern of circadian gastric acidity differs between H pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients with and without duodenal gastric metaplasia. PATIENTS: Seventy one patients with duodenal ulcer confirmed by endoscopy and who were found to be positive for H pylori infection by histology on antrum biopsy specimens were enrolled into this study. METHODS: Gastric type epithelium in the duodenum was found in 49 of 71 ulcer patients (69%). Continuous 24 hour gastric pH metry was performed in 50 healthy subjects and in the two subgroups of duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia in the duodenum. Gastric acidity was calculated for 24 hours (1700-1659), night (2000-0759) and day-time (0800-1959). RESULTS: Ulcer patients without gastric metaplasia showed a significantly higher gastric acidity (p < 0.001) than controls for every time interval considered, while the ulcer subgroup with gastric metaplasia was more acid than healthy subjects (p < 0.001) during the whole 24 hour period and the daytime. There was no difference between the two subgroups of duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia during the various time segments analysed. CONCLUSION: The findings confirm that the circadian gastric acidity of duodenal ulcer patients is higher than that of controls. As there is no difference in gastric pH between duodenal ulcer patients with and without gastric metaplasia, gastric hyperacidity is not specific to patients with duodenal gastric metaplasia. It is probable that this histological change is a non-specific response to mucosal injury resulting from various factors and not exclusively to acid.

Evaluation of 24-hour gastric acidity in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Data from previous studies on gastric acid secretion in patients with hepatic cirrhosis are controversial, due, at least in part, to the possible interference of liver failure and altered gastric mucosal microcirculation on the pharmacological action of the substances used to stimulate the parietal cell. For this reason, we wished to investigate the circadian pattern of gastric acidity by means of continuous 24-hour pH monitoring, which permits measurement of pH fluctuations in a nearly physiological manner and does not require any pharmacological stimulus. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with liver cirrhosis of different aetiology were recruited for this study. They underwent 24-hour gastric pH-metry with an electrode positioned in the gastric corpus, and their pattern of gastric acidity was compared with that of 49 healthy subjects, matched for age and sex. In a subgroup of 31 patients with cirrhosis, antral pH was recorded in addition to body pH in order to assess whether there are regional differences in gastric acidity. RESULTS: The circadian, daytime and nocturnal gastric acidity in patients with cirrhosis was significantly lower (p < 0.05-0.001) than that of controls. In the 31 patients studied with two electrodes, antral pH was higher (p < 0.05) than body pH only during the night. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection was rather low (42%) in our patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is a marked hypoacidity over the circadian cycle in patients with cirrhosis compared to controls, and the greatest difference between them is visible during the nocturnal hours. Also, in patients with liver cirrhosis the pH in the antrum is higher than that in the body of the stomach during the night for reasons that need to be elucidated.

Time pattern of gastric acidity in Barrett's esophagus.

Increased gastroesophageal acid reflux is frequently found in patients with Barrett's esophagus, and it has been hypothesized that gastric acid hypersecretion could be an important factor aggravating the exposure of esophageal mucosa to acid and then contributing to the development of this disorder. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the circadian pattern of gastric acidity differs between refluxer patients with and without Barrett's esophagus and normal subjects. Continuous 24-hr gastric pH monitoring was performed in 119 healthy volunteers, 20 patients with Barrett's esophagus, 37 patients with moderate and 10 patients with severe reflux esophagitis without Barrett's esophagus. In all these diseases the final diagnosis was ascertained by means of endoscopy plus biopsy. There was no difference in the 24-hr and daytime patterns of gastric pH between healthy subjects and patients with Barrett's esophagus, while nocturnal acidity was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the latter population. Gastric acidity, in contrast, was higher (P < 0.05) in controls than in patients with both moderate and severe reflux esophagitis without Barrett's esophagus during the whole 24-hr period. There was no difference between refluxer patients with and without Barrett's esophagus in any of the three time intervals we analyzed. Because normal subjects had lower gastric pH than patients with Barrett's esophagus during the night and than patients with reflux esophagitis during the whole 24-hr period, gastric hyperacidity is not a relevant factor in the development of both metaplastic columnar epithelium and inflammatory changes in the distal esophagus, and other pathophysiological mechanisms are involved in these histological alterations.