RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In 2010, 33% of young Europeans (ages 15-29) were Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET), rising to 40 million by 2015. Those with disabilities or health challenges are 40% more likely to be NEET. Hence, we conducted a systematic search to identify health challenges as NEET risk factors. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across four databases on February 21, 2023, with an update on January 15, 2024. Data collected after 1980 were included. The main findings from this search concerning risk factors are summarized in a chart. RESULTS: A total of 33,314 articles were screened, resulting in the inclusion of 32 articles in this review. The review identified multiple physical risk factors associated with NEET status, which were categorized into two primary domains: congenital conditions and birth-related factors, for example, factors encompassed neonatal life in utero and experiences related to birth, and health conditions during childhood and adolescence, for example, survivors of childhood cancer and other severe health conditions during childhood and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that varying congenital conditions and birth-related factors as well as diseases from childhood to adulthood challenges or even hinder educational and job market participation, this emphasizing the importance of targeted support for children facing health challenges. These findings highlight the immediate requirement for comprehensive interventions specifically designed for children and adolescents who are for example, preterm, have experienced severe illness, or are coping with chronic diseases. These interventions should address the challenges encountered by youth in NEET. However, limited evidence on the impact of health conditions on NEET status underscores the necessity for further research into both short- and long-term effects.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In the fields of labor market and education research, there is a vast interest in mental health factors affecting unsuccessful school-to-work transitions, dropout from school and labor market disconnections for young people. Young people who are not in employment, education or training are conceived of as NEET. AIM: To get an overview we conducted a systematic review of the present literature on the influence of mental health on the likelihood of becoming NEET in Europe. METHOD: A Systematic literature search was conducted in four databases on February 21, 2023, with an update on January 15, 2024. RESULTS: 33,314 articles were screened whereas 41 studies involving 8,914,123 individuals were included. Poor mental health such as attention deficit hyperactive disorder, autism, depression, borderline, and psychosis during childhood and adolescence is strongly associated with becoming NEET. CONCLUSION: Mental health issues, whether mild or severe, heighten significant the risk of adverse education and employment outcomes in early adulthood, extending to young individuals with personality disorders, borderline personality disorder, and psychoses. These observations inform early intervention strategies for children and young people grappling with mental health challenges. Timely treatment is essential. Future research should focus on the gap in research like specific disorders such as eating disorders and anxiety.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that anticholinergic medications are associated with cardiovascular disease. Little is known about how discontinuation of anticholinergic medication affects this association. We investigated how baseline anticholinergic load and change in anticholinergic load associates with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) on four different scales. METHODS: We included all geriatric outpatients aged 65 and older in Denmark between January 2011 and December 2018. Data were sourced from Danish national registries. Anticholinergic drug exposure was assessed at first contact to the outpatient clinic (baseline) and changes were assessed at 180 days after outpatient contact. Anticholinergic scales were the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale, Anticholinergic Drugs Scale, Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden and a scale by the Danish Institute of Rational Pharmacotherapy. Multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the 1- and 5-year risk of MACE by baseline anticholinergic load and changes in anticholinergic load after 180 days. RESULTS: We included a total of 64 378 patients in the analysis of baseline anticholinergic load and 54 010 patients remained after 180 days for inclusion in the analysis of change in anticholinergic load. At baseline the mean age was 81.7 year (SD 7.5) and 68% were women. Higher level of anticholinergic load on any scale associated with greater risk of MACE in a dose response pattern. There were no association between reduction in anticholinergic load and risk of MACE. CONCLUSION: While anticholinergic load at baseline was associated with MACE, reducing anticholinergic load did not lower the risk of MACE indicating the association may not be causal.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Medición de Riesgo , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
AIM: The purpose of this scoping review is to map the knowledge about the multisensory birthing room regarding the birth experience and birth outcomes. BACKGROUND: The concept of multisensory birthing rooms is relatively novel, making it relevant to explore its impact. METHODS: Five databases were searched. The search was limited to articles in English, Danish, Norwegian, and Swedish. There were no time limitations. Fourteen relevant articles were identified providing knowledge about multisensory birthing rooms. RESULTS: Eight articles focused on birth experience, six articles focused on birth outcome, and one on the organization of the maternity care. Seven of the studies identified that sensory birthing rooms have a positive impact on the birth experience and one qualitative study could not demonstrate a better overall birth experience. Five articles described an improvement for selected birth outcomes. On the other hand, a randomized controlled trial study could not demonstrate an effect on either the use of oxytocin or birth outcomes such as pain and cesarean section. The definition and description of the concept weaken the existing studies scientifically. CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review revealed that multisensory birthing rooms have many definitions and variations in the content of the sensory exposure; therefore, it is difficult to standardize and evaluate the effect of its use. There is limited knowledge concerning the multisensory birthing room and its impact on the birth experience and the birth outcome. Multisensory birthing rooms may have a positive impact on the birth experience. Whereas there are conflicting results regarding birth outcomes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease of the oesophagus. Eosinophilic oesophagitis is associated with a substantial disease burden affecting the quality of life and affecting mental health. There are limited data describing the incidence of psychiatric disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs (PDs) in EoE patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate whether EoE patients in Denmark have higher use of PDs, contacts with the department of psychiatry, and attempts of suicide or intentional self-harm compared with the general population after being diagnosed with EoE. METHODS: This study was a nationwide, population-based register study including 3367 EoE patients and 16,835 age- and sex-matched comparators. A register-based EoE definition was used to identify cases. Incident PD use was extracted from the prescription register and information regarding psychiatric contacts was retrieved from the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register. RESULTS: The 5-year incidence of PD use in EoE patients was 13.8% compared to 7.1% of the matched comparators (Hazard ratio 1.83; confidence interval 1.6-2.0; p ≤ 0.001). Antidepressants were the most frequently prescribed PD, whereas antipsychotics were the least prescribed PD. Increasing age, lower educational level, and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥1) were associated with the prescription of PDs. The risk of PD use was lower in men than in women with EoE. CONCLUSION: Treatment with PDs were more common in EoE patients after they were diagnosed than in the general Danish population, indicating that EoE patients have an increased risk of psychiatric disorders.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Psicotrópicos , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Incidencia , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Older adults are susceptible to anticholinergic effects. Dysphagia and pneumonia are associated with anticholinergic usage, though a definitive causative relationship has not been established. There is no effective way to predict the prognosis of older adults with pneumonia; therefore, this study investigates the predictive value of anticholinergic burden. METHODS: Patients aged 65 years and above admitted for community-acquired pneumonia from 2011 to 2018 in Denmark were included through Danish registries. We calculated anticholinergic drug exposure using the CRIDECO Anticholinergic Load Scale (CALS). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and other outcomes included intensive care unit admission, ventilator usage, length of stay, 30-day/90-day/1-year mortality, institutionalisation, home care utilisation and readmission. RESULTS: 186,735 patients were included in the in-hospital outcome analyses, 165,181 in the readmission analysis, 150,791 in the institutionalisation analysis, and 95,197 and 73,461 patients in the home care analysis at follow-up. Higher CALS score was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, with a mean risk increasing from 9.9% (CALS 0) to 16.4% (CALS >10), though the risk plateaued above a CALS score of 8. A higher CALS score was also associated with greater mortality after discharge, more home health care, more institutionalizations and higher readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: High anticholinergic burden levels were associated with poor patient outcomes including short-/long-term mortality, dependence and readmission. It may be useful to calculate the CALS score on admission of older patients with pneumonia to predict their prognosis. This also highlights the importance of avoiding the use of drugs with a high anticholinergic burden in older patients.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Colinérgicos , Neumonía , Humanos , Anciano , Antagonistas Colinérgicos/efectos adversos , Hospitalización , Alta del Paciente , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A low incidence of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children in the North Denmark Region (NDR) were measured in 2007-2017. Few of the children diagnosed before 2017 were treated to remission suggesting a lack of awareness. While there currently are no guidelines for treating EoE in Denmark, a new English guideline was published in 2022 renewing focus on the disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the difference of current Danish clinical practice for treatment and follow-up of EoE children in the NDR with the new English guideline from the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and the British Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (BSPGHAN). METHODS: This retrospective, register-based DanEoE cohort study included 31 children diagnosed with EoE between 2007 and 2021 in NDR. Medical records were reviewed and information about treatment and follow-up were collected. RESULTS: In 32% of the children with EoE in the NDR, first-line treatment corresponded with the new English guideline. One in 6 children were never started on any treatment even though treatment always is recommended. Histologic evaluation within 12 weeks as recommended was performed in 13% of the children. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark focus on improving EoE treatment and follow-up for children is needed, as there is a significant difference between current clinical practice and the recommendations in the new English guideline.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Niño , Humanos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales Infantiles , DinamarcaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Food bolus obstruction (FBO) leading to hospital treatment is often associated with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), stenosis, or oesophageal cancer (1). Danish national guidelines recommend that patients with FBO undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy within two weeks of presentation to exclude possible malignancy, and histological evaluation of eight biopsies (2, 3). AIMS: The aims of this study were to (1) report the incidence and describe the causes and treatment of FBO in the North Denmark Region (NDR), (2) determine the proportion of patients who underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy according to regional and national guidelines, and (3) identify International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes applied to the hospital visits due to FBO in the NDR. METHODS: Among all acute hospital visits in the NDR in 2021, all visits with ICD-10 codes possibly reflecting FBO, as well as a random sample of 14,400 visits with unspecific ICD-10 codes (R and Z codes), were screened manually for possible FBO. Diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of all patients with FBO were recorded. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66.0 (Q1-Q3: 49.8-81.0) years, and half of the patients had experienced FBO before. Two thirds of patients (66.0%) were never diagnosed with a cause of FBO, followed by 17.3% with EoE. 30% of patients did not undergo upper endoscopy within two weeks of the hospital visit, and 50.7% were never biopsied in the oesophagus. Of 1886 hospital visits with registry ICD-10 codes that possibly reflected FBO, 8.4% were due to FBO, while FBO was present in 0.028% of the random sample of unspecific ICD-10 codes. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitalized FBO patients in the NDR in 2021 were never diagnosed with a cause. In these patients there is a high risk of overlooked EoE or upper gastrointestinal cancers. The area needs immediate focus and changed routines to improve treatment and prevent new FBO.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Estenosis Esofágica , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Estenosis Esofágica/diagnóstico , Estenosis Esofágica/epidemiología , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Minimal Eating Observation Form - Version II (MEOF-II) is a brief and easy to use screening tool for eating difficulties, that is psychometrically robust. The aim of this study was to explore convergent (measuring similar constructs) and discriminant (measuring somewhat different constructs) validity of the MEOF-II to other validated dysphagia specific, activity and participation related instruments. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, participants (n = 100, mean age 72, n = 42 women), diagnosed with either chronic pulmonary disease, Parkinson´s disease, Multiple Sclerosis, or stroke were recruited from rehabilitation centres. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical-rated assessments, capturing eating ability in general and swallowing in specific, included: The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI), the 4-question test (4QT), the Minimal Eating Observation Form - II, the Volume - Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) documented according to the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Type of oral intake was documented using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS). Activities in daily living was assessed with Barthel index (BI). Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze associations. The MEOF-II total score was hypothesised to have moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.3) with the other assessments, besides with PAS and FOIS (weak correlations, r < 0.3). RESULTS: In total 78 participants had any type of eating difficulties (MEOF-II), 69 reported dysphagia (4QT), 62 had dysphagia according to V-VST, 29 showed evidence of penetration/aspiration (PAS), and 31 participants had decreased oral intake ability (FOIS). The MEOF-II total score had moderate correlations with DHI, BI, 4QT, V-VST volume, and weak correlations with V-VST dysphagia and viscosity, PAS, and FOIS. Comparing a prior hypothesised correlation strengths against empirical findings showed that 83% of the hypothesised correlations were correct. CONCLUSIONS: The MEOF-II is a holistic and objective screening tool that can indicate the need for further assessment and corresponds well with the persons' subjective experiences. MEOF-II does not specifically assess the risk for penetration/aspiration.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Deglución , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: When a seriously ill and dying parent is hospitalized, the families are at risk of developing problems. Only sparse evidence is available on the effects of creating family-friendly rooms in hospitals. AIM: This study investigates how a seriously ill parent to children aged 0-18 experiences staying in a hospital room with family-friendly furnishing. METHODS: From September 2012 to September 2015, seriously ill and dying patients with children ages 0-18 were offered the opportunity to stay in a family-friendly room at the North Denmark Regional Hospital. The sick parents were interviewed about how the changed room impacted themselves, their children, and their family. RESULTS: The analysis led to three themes: (1) The ability to visit a sick parent, (2) maintaining family functions and relationships, and (3) room for children and adults. CONCLUSION: By offering the families a hospital room with cozy furniture and a big TV screen, seriously ill parents see that their children are more comfortable when visiting the hospital. A family-friendly hospital is not just an idealistic thought, it is a real opportunity to improve the final period of a dying parent's life.
Asunto(s)
Padres , Pacientes , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Hospitales , Diseño Interior y MobiliarioRESUMEN
Background: Cannabis may offer therapeutic benefits to patients with advanced cancer not responding adequately to conventional palliative treatment. However, tolerability is a major concern. Cognitive function is a potential adverse reaction to tetrahydrocannabinol containing regimens. The aim of this study was to test cognitive function in patients being prescribed dronabinol as an adjuvant palliative therapy. Methods: Adult patients with advanced cancer and severe related pain refractory to conventional palliative treatment were included in this case-series study. Patients were examined at baseline in conjunction with initiation of dronabinol therapy and at a two-week follow-up using three selected Wechsler's adult intelligence scale III neurocognitive tests: Processing Speed Index (PSI), Perceptual Organization Index (POI), and Working Memory Index (WMI). Patients were also assessed using pain visual analog scale, Major Depression Inventory, and Brief Fatigue Inventory. Results: Eight patients consented to take part in the study. Two patients discontinued dronabinol therapy, one due to a complaint of dizziness and another critical progression of cancer disease, respectively. The remaining six patients were successfully treated with a daily dosage of 12.5 mg dronabinol (p = 0.039). PSI (p = 0.020), POI (p = 0.034.), and WMI (p = 0.039). Conclusions: Cognitive function improved in this group of patients with advanced cancer in conjunction with low-dose dronabinol therapy. The cause is likely multifactorial including reported relief of cancer-associated symptoms. Further clinical investigation is required.
RESUMEN
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of chin tuck against resistance (CTAR) for citizens suffering from dysphagia compared to the standard municipal treatment in Denmark. Patients and Methods: A cost-utility analysis, employing a municipal perspective, was conducted using cost data collected alongside clinical data of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of CTAR training for citizens with dysphagia. The composition of the clinical randomized controlled trial, which included citizens with different diagnoses, means that participants had different disease courses. Ninety-two citizens from seven different Danish municipalities were enrolled, of whom 43 received standard care, and 49 received CTAR in addition to standard care. The effect outcome of the economic evaluation was quality-adjusted life years (QALY), estimated using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Individual resource consumption of each citizen was determined based on the use of home care, home nursing care, physio- and occupational therapy, dietitian guidance, and hospital admissions. The incremental costs and QALYs between the intervention group (CTAR in addition to standard care) and standard care group were estimated using regression analysis, and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the robustness of the results. Results: The base case analysis showed that the intervention group was dominant compared to the standard care group, with a decrease in incremental costs of £542.38 and an increase in incremental QALYs of 0.0118. All sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar findings as the base case analysis, supporting the robustness of the results. Conclusion: This study found that the intervention group was the dominant alternative, hence being more effective and cost-saving, compared to the standard care group in a Danish municipality perspective with a three-month time horizon. This study adds to the scarce evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CTAR in a Danish clinical setting, but further studies should focus on estimating long-term cost-effectiveness.
RESUMEN
Background and Aim: Little are known about differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients in the general population compared with patients treated at academic hospitals. This might affect the generalizability of study results. The aims of the study were to compare clinical features, and complications of EoE between patients from a population-based cohort (DanEoE) and patients from an academic hospital cohort in Copenhagen (EoE-Cph). Methods: The DanEoE cohort is a population- and register-based cohort including all 236 adult EoE patients diagnosed in the North Denmark Region in 2007-2017 previously described in detail. The new EoE-Cph cohort consists of 245 consecutively referred adult patients to a dedicated EoE center in an Academic Hospital in the Danish capital in 2013-2020. Data were collected from medical registries and medical files. Results: Patients in the academic cohort were at symptom debut 12 (SD 16) years younger (P = 0.001). At the time of diagnosis they were 5.4 (SD 15) years younger (P < 0.001). Where Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD) was present in one-third of the population-based cohort, this was only observed in 14% of the EoE-Cph group (P < 0.05). Food bolus obstruction before diagnosis was 24% less common in the EoE-Cph patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Results indicated that EoE patients referred to a Danish EoE center is a selected subgroup with disease debut at a younger age, less comorbid GORD, and rarely food bolus obstruction before diagnosis. This suggests that study results from academic hospitals might not have generalizability to the average EoE patient in a population.
RESUMEN
Background and Aim: The DanEoE is a previously described population- and register-based cohort of 236 adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in a well-defined Danish region with a population of 580 000 and free medical treatment. The aim of the study was to compare the phenotype and treatment response between EoE patients with complications to patients without complications at diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study of the DanEoE cohort's 236 adult EoE patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2017 in the North Denmark Region. Patients were divided into a group who had had complications (dilated or food bolus obstruction [FBO]) before or at the diagnosis, and a group without. Results: At the diagnostic endoscopy, 61% had never had a complication, and 39% had either had FBO (n = 77) or been dilated (n = 15). The complicated group had the same mean age at symptom debut (37 [SD = 16] vs 37 [SD = 17] years, P = 1.0), but were diagnosed significantly later with a resulting longer diagnostic delay (13 [SD = 13] vs 7.9 [SD = 11] years, P = 0.01). Almost half of all patients were never treated to symptomatic remission (uncomplicated 40%, complicated 49%). The histological remission was not secured in the majority (uncomplicated 68%, complicated 70%). Despite this, <15% of patients with previous FBO experienced this after the diagnosis. Conclusion: In the population-based DanEoE cohort, results indicated that the complicated EoE phenotype was a patient with a 5-year longer diagnostic delay. In the current study, the complication status did not predict the treatment response.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: There is an increasing prevalence of chronic heart failure (HF). It is well known that patients with HF and disturbances in the potassium level have an increased mortality risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognosis of a second plasma-potassium measurement after an episode with hyperkalaemia on short-term mortality in patients with chronic HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: From Danish national registers, 2,339 patients with chronic HF and hyperkalaemia (>4.6 mmol/L) at first potassium measurement within 14-365 days from concomitant treatment were identified. To be included, a second measurement was required within 6-30 days subsequent to the first measurement and the 60-day mortality was observed. Based on the second measurement, the patients were divided into five groups: <3.5 mmol/L (n = 257), 3.5-4.0 mmol/L (n = 709), 4.1-4.6 mmol/L (n = 1,204, reference), 4.7-5.0 mmol/L (n = 89) and >5.0 mmol/L (n = 80). To assess all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, we used the Cox regression model. The multivariable analysis showed that patients with potassium concentrations <3.5 mmol/L (hazard ratio (HR): 3.03; 95% CI: 2.49-3.70) and 3.5-4.0 mmol/L (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.54-2.14) had a worse prognosis compared to the reference. We observed similar results when calculating the risk of cardiovascular mortality. A restricted cubic spline curve showed a U-shaped relationship between plasma-potassium and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic HF and hyperkalaemia who became hypokalaemic after 6-30 days were associated with a higher 60-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to the reference. This also applied for patients with low normal potassium concentrations (3.5-4.0 mmol/L).
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hiperpotasemia , Hipopotasemia , Humanos , Hiperpotasemia/epidemiología , Hiperpotasemia/complicaciones , Potasio , Pronóstico , Hipopotasemia/epidemiología , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the North Denmark Region an increased awareness of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) was observed after 2011 where a regional biopsy guideline was implemented. This resulted in an increased awareness of EoE and a 50-fold increase in the incidence of EoE patients between 2007-2017. AIMS: The aims of this study were to examine the progress in diagnostic delay, complications, PPI treatment, and follow up since 2017 in Danish patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective registry- and population-based cohort study (DanEoE2 cohort) including 346 adult patients with esophageal eosinophilia diagnosed between 2018-2021 in the North Denmark Region. The DanEoE2 cohort included all possible EoE patients by using the Danish Patho-histology registry based on the SNOMED-system. The data was analyzed and compared to the DanEoE cohort (2007-2017). RESULTS: The diagnostic delay of EoE patients diagnosed between 2018-2021 in the North Denmark Region had decreased with a median of 1.5 years (5.5 (2.0;12) years versus 4.0 (1.0;12) years, p=0.03). Strictures before diagnosis had decreased 8.4 % (11.6% versus 3.2%, p=0.003). The number of patients started on high-dose PPI increased (56% versus 88%, p<0.001). An intensified awareness regarding national guidelines and follow-up was observed as an increase in the number of histological follow up (67% versus 74%, p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of the DanEoE cohorts showed a decrease in diagnostic delay, a decrease in stricture formation before diagnosis, and an improved guideline adherence after 2017. Future studies are needed to assess if symptomatic or histological remission on PPI treatment is more capable of predicting a patient's risk of developing complications.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Adulto , Humanos , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Constricción Patológica , Diagnóstico Tardío/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Adhesión a Directriz , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background: All healthy mothers with uncomplicated births are recommended to be discharged directly from the labour ward a few hours after birth as a change in practice in three hospitals in Denmark. However, despite this practice, there is limited knowledge about when mothers leave the hospital after birth in clinical practice. Objective: The aim of this study is to examine 1) when mothers are discharged from hospital after birth, 2) if discharge time from the hospital after birth is associated with parity, and 3) which factors are associated with discharge time. Methods: This retrospective study is based on data from the North Denmark Regional Hospital and included mothers giving vaginal birth from March 25, 2019 to April 10, 2021. Results: A total of 1990 mothers were included. Nearly 50% of the new mothers stayed at the hospital less than 6 h after birth (26% of primiparous women vs 64% of multiparous women). Primiparous women had an adjusted RR 0.44 (95% CI 0.39-0.49) for discharge ≤6 h, RR 1.71 (95% CI 1.15-2.54) for discharge >6-12 h, and RR 3.76 (95% CI 3.03-4.67) for discharge >48 h after birth compared to multiparous women. Multiparous women's adjusted RR for discharge >6-12 h was 0.15 (95% CI 0.12-0.20) and for discharge >48 h 0.16 (95% CI 0.14-0.20) compared to discharge less than 6 h after birth. Furthermore, smoking, low education level, and younger age were associated with early discharge. Conclusion: There is a significant association with parity and discharge time after birth and factors related to discharge time which healthcare professionals should be aware of when planning inpatient and outpatient care. In addition, healthcare professionals should be aware of mothers discharged early who are smoking, of younger age, lower education level or multiparity.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Gender difference in the incidence of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is well-known as more men than women are affected. However, knowledge of gender differences is lacking for most other aspects of EoE. In this population-based adult EoE cohort, the aim was to study if gender differences exist with respect to 1) clinical phenotype, 2) treatment response and 3) complications. METHODS: This was a retrospective, registry-based DanEoE cohort study of 236 adult patients with EoE (178 adult men and 58 adult women) diagnosed in 2007-2017 in the North Denmark Region. Medical registries were searched for patient records and pathology reports. RESULTS: No statistically or clinically significant differences were recorded in the phenotype regarding symptoms reported, macroscopic or histological findings at diagnosis (all p > 0.3). A comparable number of men and women were followed up symptomatically and histologically (all p > 0.3). More men than women reported "no symptoms" on proton pump inhibitor (56% men versus 39% women, p = 0.04), although the histological response was similar between genders (p = 0.4). The proportions of food bolus obstructions and dilations were comparable (all p > 0.4). CONCLUSION: This study found very few gender differences. Results suggest that men and women with EoE may receive the same treatment. FUNDING: none. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Sistema de Registros , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common following hip fracture in ortho-geriatric patients and is associated with postoperative infections.. This study investigated whether intravenous iron supplements reduced the rate of postoperative infections within 30 days postoperatively in older adults after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: This observational study included 198 ortho-geriatric patients July 2018-May 2020. In May 2019 a local guideline was implemented and recommended II therapy on the 3rd postoperative day if haemoglobin concentration was < 6.5 mmol/L after hip fracture surgery. RESULTS: The patients were divided into four treatment groups: blood transfusion (n = 44), IV iron (n = 69), blood transfusion + IV iron (n = 35) and no treatment (n = 50). The number of patients who had an infection within 30 days was similar in the two time periods (38.8% before vs. 38.9% after systematic I.V. iron supplementation, P = 1.00) and no significant difference according to risk of infection was found between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: This study documents no effect of intravenous iron supplements on postoperative infections in older adults after hip fracture surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the Danish Data Protection Authority (2008-58-0028) the 2th of September 2019.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Fracturas de Cadera , Humanos , Anciano , Hierro , Anemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia/etiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To establish a generally accepted Danish definition of dysphagia to enhance collaboration across sectors and professions. METHODS: The study was initiated by a multi-professional group of experienced researchers and board members of the Danish Society for Dysphagia. We used a modified Delphi methodology to achieve consensus among experienced health care professionals from different professions and contexts. The initial stage consisted of a literature search leading to the draft of different definitions followed by two Delphi rounds between professionals and a stakeholder consultation round. RESULTS: We conducted two Delphi rounds until one definition was clearly preferred. A total of 194 participants responded in round one, and 279 in round two. Both rounds had a broad representation of sectors and geography and most participants had worked with dysphagia for more than four years. CONCLUSION: The preferred definition was 'Dysphagia is a functional impairment that either prevents or limits the intake of food and fluids, and which makes swallowing unsafe, inefficient, uncomfortable or affects quality of life'. The definition was widely accepted among different health professional groups, patients and across sectors.