Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Urol ; 192(4): 1131-6, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24846798

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Motor vehicle collisions are the most common cause of blunt genitourinary trauma. We compared renal injuries with no protective device to those with seat belts and/or airbags using NTDB. Our primary end point was a decrease in high grade (grades III-V) renal injuries with a secondary end point of a nephrectomy rate reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The NTDB research data sets for hospital admission years 2010, 2011 and 2012 were queried for motor vehicle collision occupants with renal injury. Subjects were stratified by protective device and airbag deployment. The AIS was converted to AAST renal injury grade and nephrectomy rates were evaluated. Intergroup comparisons were analyzed for renal injury grades, nephrectomy, length of stay and mortality using the chi-square test or 1-way ANOVA. The relative risk reduction of protective devices was determined. RESULTS: A review of 466,028 motor vehicle collisions revealed a total of 3,846 renal injuries. Injured occupants without a protective device had a higher rate of high grade renal injuries (45.1%) than those with seat belts (39.9%, p = 0.008), airbags (42.3%, p = 0.317) and seat belts plus airbags (34.7%, p <0.001). Seat belts (20.0%), airbags (10.5%) and seat belts plus airbags (13.3%, each p <0.001) decreased the nephrectomy rate compared to no protective device (56.2%). The combination of seatbelts and airbags also decreased total hospital length of stay (p <0.001) and intensive care unit days (p = 0.005). The relative risk reductions of high grade renal injuries (23.1%) and nephrectomy (39.9%) were highest for combined protective devices. CONCLUSIONS: Occupants of motor vehicle collisions with protective devices show decreased rates of high grade renal injury and nephrectomy. Reduction appears most pronounced with the combination of seat belts and airbags.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/epidemiología , Accidentes de Tránsito , Airbags , Riñón/lesiones , Nefrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Cinturones de Seguridad , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/prevención & control , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Riñón/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/prevención & control , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
3.
J Trauma ; 67(5): 1033-9, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19901665

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pelvic fractures from blunt force trauma place the bladder and urethra at risk for injury, often resulting in significant complications. We sought to compare morbidity, mortality, and health care resource utilization in patients with and without genitourinary injuries (GUI) associated with pelvic fractures. METHODS: In this retrospective study of patients with blunt force pelvic fractures, the incidence of GUI, initial emergency department data, mechanism of injury, morbidity, health care resource utilization, associated injuries, discharge disposition, and mortality were investigated using chi tests for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables comparing pelvic fractures with and without GUI. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to detect significant predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Of the 31,380 patients with pelvic fractures, 1,444 had GUI. Men more commonly sustained pelvic fractures with GUI than women (66.14% vs. 33.86%). The incidence of urogenital, bladder, and urethral injuries for men and women was 5.34%, 3.41%, 1.54%, and 3.62%, 3.37%, 0.15%, respectively. Patients with GUI remained hospitalized longer (median 10 vs. 6 d, p < 0.001), had more intensive care unit stay days (median 3 vs. 1 d, p < 0.001), were less often discharged home (31.02% vs. 42.82%), and had an increased mortality rate (13.99% vs. 8.08%, p < 0.001) when compared with patients without GUI. Motor vehicle collisions were the most common mechanism of injury for all pelvic fractures. Spleen and liver were the most commonly injured abdominal organs associated with pelvic fractures as a whole. Pelvic fractures with GUI were more likely to result in associated injuries of the bowel, and reproductive organs. Although GUI was not found to be an independent predictor of mortality, age >or=65 years, initial systolic blood pressure in the emergency department 0 mm Hg to 90 mm Hg, Injury Severity Score >or=25, Glasgow coma score of

Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Genitales/lesiones , Traumatismo Múltiple/epidemiología , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Sistema Urinario/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos , Acetábulo/lesiones , Adulto , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Humanos , Ilion/lesiones , Incidencia , Traumatismo Múltiple/mortalidad , Hueso Púbico/lesiones , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Am J Surg ; 192(2): 243-7, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16860638

RESUMEN

Open management of the abdomen has become an accepted technique for both the treatment and the prevention of abdominal compartment syndrome. It has also gained popularity as a treatment option in situations requiring multiple laparotomies such as uncontrolled intra-abdominal infections and severe abdominal injury necessitating damage control surgery. A significant number of patients managed with the open abdomen technique are unable to undergo complete abdominal wall closure and consequently develop large, complex anterior abdominal wall hernias. We report the use of a controlled fascial tensioning device, the Wittmann Patch (Starsurgical, Inc, Burlington, WI), in combination with an adhesion preventing barrier to allow for unhindered sequential medial advancement of the fascia toward the midline. The use of these 2 devices together may lead to a higher incidence of fascia-to-fascia abdominal wall closure than the use of fascial tension alone.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Adhesivos , Síndromes Compartimentales/cirugía , Fasciotomía , Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Laparotomía/métodos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Vendajes , Síndromes Compartimentales/complicaciones , Drenaje , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Vacio , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...