RESUMEN
Water molecules play a key role in many biomolecular systems, particularly when bound at protein-ligand interfaces. However, molecular simulation studies on such systems are hampered by the relatively long time scales over which water exchange between a protein and solvent takes place. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) is a simulation technique that avoids this issue by attempting the insertion and deletion of water molecules within a given structure. The approach is constrained by low acceptance probabilities for insertions in congested systems, however. To address this issue, here, we combine GCMC with nonequilibium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) to yield a method that we refer to as grand canonical nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (GCNCMC), in which the water insertions and deletions are carried out in a gradual, nonequilibrium fashion. We validate this new approach by comparing GCNCMC and GCMC simulations of bulk water and three protein binding sites. We find that not only is the efficiency of the water sampling improved by GCNCMC but that it also results in increased sampling of ligand conformations in a protein binding site, revealing new water-mediated ligand-binding geometries that are not observed using alternative enhanced sampling techniques.
RESUMEN
Water plays an important role in mediating protein-ligand interactions. Water rearrangement upon a ligand binding or modification can be very slow and beyond typical timescales used in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Thus, inadequate sampling of slow water motions in MD simulations often impairs the accuracy of the accuracy of ligand binding free energy calculations. Previous studies suggest grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) outperforms normal MD simulations for water sampling, thus GCMC has been applied to help improve the accuracy of ligand binding free energy calculations. However, in prior work we observed protein and/or ligand motions impaired how well GCMC performs at water rehydration, suggesting more work is needed to improve this method to handle water sampling. In this work, we applied GCMC in 21 protein-ligand systems to assess the performance of GCMC for rehydrating buried water sites. While our results show that GCMC can rapidly rehydrate all selected water sites for most systems, it fails in five systems. In most failed systems, we observe protein/ligand motions, which occur in the absence of water, combine to close water sites and block instantaneous GCMC water insertion moves. For these five failed systems, we both extended our GCMC simulations and tested a new technique named grand canonical nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (GCNCMC). GCNCMC combines GCMC with the nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) sampling technique to improve the probability of a successful water insertion/deletion. Our results show that GCNCMC and extended GCMC can rehydrate all target water sites for three of the five problematic systems and GCNCMC is more efficient than GCMC in two out of the three systems. In one system, only GCNCMC can rehydrate all target water sites, while GCMC fails. Both GCNCMC and GCMC fail in one system. This work suggests this new GCNCMC method is promising for water rehydration especially when protein/ligand motions may block water insertion/removal.
