Evaluation of diphtheria convalescent patients to serve as donors for the production of anti-diphtheria immunoglobulin preparations.

AIMS: The study was conducted to evaluate the possibility of selecting convalescent diphtheria patients to serve in emergency situations as donors for the production of anti-diphtheria immunoglobulin. To select suitable donors, the criterion of an antitoxin titer >/=3.0 IU/ml was used. In addition, the effects of treatment and the effect of immunization with diphtheria toxoid on the level of anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies were evaluated. SCOPE: Three groups of diphtheria patients were included in the study. The first group (n = 23) consisted of patients who had a basic antibiotic treatment, with or without serotherapy using horse antitoxin and/or human immunoglobulin. The second group (n = 12) comprised patients examined immediately after the onset of disease. The immunological history of this group was not known. The third group (n = 20) included patients with a known immunization history, treated only with antibiotics but having received a booster immunization with diphtheria toxoid. Antitoxin titers were measured using the toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) assay. CONCLUSIONS: In the first group, 47.8% (11/23) of the patients had a diphtheria antibody titer >/=3.0 IU/ml. For most of them, however, the antibody titers could have resulted from treatment with exogenous antibodies from horse antitoxin or human immunoglobulin (18/23). Only two of the 11 high-titer subjects had received antibiotics only. Among the second group, only two (16.76%) of the patients had an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml. In the third group 50% (10/20) of the patients showed an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml prior to vaccination, and therefore could be directly considered as donors. Three weeks after booster vaccination, 70% (14/20) had an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml and 1 year after booster vaccination, 28.6% (2/7) of the subjects still had titers of >/=3.0 IU/ml. In 40% of these patients, a decrease was observed 3-4 weeks after the booster dose. It was concluded that convalescent diphtheria patients could be considered as donors in an emergency situation, since approximately half of them showed antitoxin titers of >/=3.0 IU/ml.

Circulation of subtype A and gagA/envB recombinant HIV type 1 strains among injecting drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia, correlates with geographical origin of infections.

Countries of the former Soviet Union are experiencing an emerging HIV-1 epidemic due to a rapid expansion of HIV-1 among injecting drug users (IDUs). To study the molecular epidemiology of HIV-1 among IDUs in St. Petersburg, Russia, virus sequences were obtained from 22 individuals. Phylogenetic analysis of the env and gag regions revealed circulation of two major HIV-1 populations, one belonging to HIV-1 subtype A, and another being a recombinant of subtype A and B viruses (gagA/envB). Both virus populations were highly homogeneous, with a mean pairwise genetic distance of <2%, and similar to viruses obtained earlier from IDUs in other regions of the former Soviet Union. Distribution of the two major HIV-1 genotypes in St. Petersburg correlated with geographical origin of infections. In one individual, a virus type previously unseen among IDUs was found, which demonstrates the possibility that new viruses are entering this risk group.

Fatal respiratory tract diphtheria apparently caused by nontoxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae.

A major diphtheria epidemic affecting the whole population of St. Petersburg started in 1990. During the period of 1991 to 1995, 4600 patients with clinical respiratory tract diphtheria were treated in Botkin's Hospital. From 112 (2.4%) of these patients only a nontoxigenic strain of Corynebacterium diphtheriae was isolated. Three patients with this strain who were suffering from clinical disease consistent with classical toxic diphtheria died. All had myocarditis, two had asphyxia due to membrane formation in the lower respiratory tract, and one had severe polyneuritis. In two patients the causative agent was of the biotype mitis and in the third intermedius, whereas the prevailing epidemic strain was of the biotype gravis. As the clinical presentation of the disease in the three patients who died was typical of toxic diphtheria, it is considered likely that the immunodiffusion test for toxin production in vitro may fail to detect strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae producing toxin in vivo.