Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Left Atrial Appendage Volumetric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) echocardiographic assessment is difficult because of the complex shape and relatively small size of the LAA. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic imaging can overcome the limitations of two-dimensional imaging. Pulsed-wave Doppler is the only currently standard LAA functional parameter. The aim of this study was to test a new approach for 3D echocardiographic volumetric analysis to obtain LAA ejection fraction (EF), its size and shape. METHODS: Transesophageal two-dimensional and 3D LAA images were prospectively obtained in 159 consecutive patients. LAA volumes were measured from 3D echocardiographic images using available software. Pulsed-wave Doppler was considered the reference value for LAA function and was used for comparison with LAA EF. Comparison with cardiac computed tomography was performed in a subgroup of 32 patients. Comparisons included linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses. Repeated measurements were performed to assess measurement variability. RESULTS: Nine patients were excluded because of suboptimal image quality (94% feasibility). Three-dimensional LAA calculated EF was in good agreement with LAA pulsed-wave measurements. Three-dimensional morphologic evaluation showed that 43% of the patients had "chicken wing," 33% "cactus," 19% "windsock," and 5% cauliflower shapes. At the time of data acquisition, patients with atrial fibrillation had nonsignificantly larger LAA end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, leading to lower calculated EFs. Three-dimensional echocardiographic LAA end-systolic volumes were in good agreement with cardiac computed tomography (r = 0.75), with small biases (mean, -2.5 ± 3.9 ml). Reproducibility was better for larger LAA volumes. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 3D echocardiographic approach can determine the geometry, size, and function of the LAA. A new parameter, LAA EF, provides functional quantitation.

The Role of National Registries in Improving Quality of Care and Outcomes for Cardiovascular Disease.

Cardiovascular registries play an integral role in providing real-world data on a number of cardiovascular conditions and allowing measurement of quality metrics across a large cohort of patients. Over the past 35 years, the number of cardiovascular registries has skyrocketed, and their use will only continue to grow as data on novel procedures and devices will need to be collected and analyzed. The American College of Cardiology and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry is just one example of a modern registry that plays a crucial role in collecting data on patients undergoing transcatheter valvular procedures. Through public reporting registries, data can be shared on a hospital and provider level for many quality performance measures. There remains much work to be done on allowing automated data extraction from the electronic medical record directly into registries. No matter how sophisticated and complete a registry is, it can never overcome the problem of treatment selection bias that is inherent in observational data. This review discusses the growth, benefits, and limitations of national registries and their role in developing evidence for best clinical practice, measuring outcomes, providing feedback to clinicians, and improving quality of care.