Treatment of axial postural abnormalities in parkinsonism disorders: A systematic review of pharmacological, rehabilitative and surgical interventions.

Axial postural abnormalities (PA) are frequent, highly disabling, and drug-refractory motor complications affecting patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) or atypical parkinsonism. Over the past few years, advances have been reached across diagnosis, assessment, and pathophysiological mechanisms of PA. Nonetheless, their management remains a challenge, and these disturbances are generally overlooked by healthcare professionals, potentially resulting in their worsening and impact on patients' disabilities. From shared consensus-based assessment and diagnostic criteria, PA calls for interdisciplinary management based on the complexity and multifactorial pathogenesis. In this context, we conducted a systematic literature review to analyze the available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for PA in PD according to the new expert-based classification of axial PA in Parkinsonism. Different multidisciplinary approaches, including dopaminergic therapy adjustment, physiotherapy, botulinum toxin injection, and deep brain stimulation, can improve PA depending on its type and severity. An early, interdisciplinary approach is recommended in PD patients to manage PA.

How Does Postural Control in Patients with Functional Motor Disorders Adapt to Multitasking-Based Immersive Virtual Reality?

BACKGROUND: Motor symptoms in functional motor disorders (FMDs) refer to involuntary, but learned, altered movement patterns associated with aberrant self-focus, sense of agency, and belief/expectations. These conditions commonly lead to impaired posture control, raising the likelihood of falls and disability. Utilizing visual and cognitive tasks to manipulate attentional focus, virtual reality (VR) integrated with posturography is a promising tool for exploring postural control disorders. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether postural control can be adapted by manipulating attentional focus in a 3D immersive VR environment. METHODS: We compared postural parameters in 17 FMDs patients and 19 age-matched healthy controls over a single session under four increasingly more complex and attention-demanding conditions: simple fixation task (1) in the real room and (2) in 3D VR room-like condition; complex fixation task in a 3D VR city-like condition (3) avoiding distractors and (4) counting them. Dual-task effect (DTE) measured the relative change in performance induced by the different attention-demanding conditions on postural parameters. RESULTS: Patients reduced sway area and mediolateral center of pressure displacement velocity DTE compared to controls (all, P < 0.049), but only under condition 4. They also showed a significant reduction in the sway area DTE under condition 4 compared to condition 3 (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides novel preliminary evidence for the value of a 3D immersive VR environment combined with different attention-demanding conditions in adapting postural control in patients with FMDs. As supported by quantitative and objective posturographic measures, our findings may inform interventions to explore FMDs pathophysiology.

Placebo effect on gait: a way to reduce the dual-task cost in older adults.

The ability to perform two tasks simultaneously is essential for daily activities. In older adults, this ability is markedly reduced, as evidenced by the dual-task cost on gait. Preliminary evidences indicate that the dual-task cost can be influenced by different types of manipulations. Here, we explored the effectiveness of a new approach to reduce the dual-task cost, based on the placebo effect, a psychobiological phenomenon whereby a positive outcome follows the administration of an inert device thought to be effective. Thirty-five healthy older adults were asked to walk on a sensorized carpet (single-task condition) and to walk while counting backward (dual-task condition) in two sessions (pre-test and post-test). A placebo group, randomly selected, underwent sham transcranial direct current stimulation over the supraorbital areas between sessions, along with information about its positive effects on concentration and attention. A control group did not receive any intervention between sessions. The dual-task cost was significantly reduced in the placebo group at the post-test session compared to the pre-test for several gait parameters (Cohen's d > 1.43). At the post-test session, the dual-task cost was also lower in the placebo group than in the control group (d > 0.73). Cognitive (number of subtractions and number of errors) and subjective (perceived mental fatigability) variables remained stable across sessions. The reduced dual-task cost in the placebo group could indicate the ability to re-establish the allocation of attentional resources between tasks. These findings could contribute to the development of cognitive strategies that leverage positive expectations to boost motor control in older adults.

Dual tasking affects gait performance but not automaticity in functional gait disorders: A new diagnostic biomarker.

INTRODUCTION: Functional gait disorders (FGDs) are disabling symptoms of Functional Motor Disorders. Clinical observations show improvement with distraction suggesting an association with higher-level control mechanisms. Dual tasking is a valuable tool for exploring the interplay between gait and cognition. Our research question was: how do different dual task paradigms shape spatio-temporal gait parameters in FGDs?. METHODS: In all, 29 patients with FGDs (age 43.48 ± 15.42 years; female 75%) and 49 healthy controls (age 43.33 ± 15.41 years; female 62%) underwent spatio-temporal gait analysis during a single task and during performance on a motor, a cognitive, and a visual-fixation dual-task. The dual-task effect was a measure of interference of the concurrent task on gait speed, stride length (a measure of gait performance), and stride time variability (a measure of automaticity and steadiness). RESULTS: Overall lower gait speed, shorter stride length, and higher stride time variability were noted in FGDs compared to healthy controls (for all, p < 0.019). The was a significant effect of group and Task × Group interaction for the dual-task effect on gait speed (p = 0.023) and stride length (p = 0.01) but not for stride time variability. CONCLUSION: Poorer gait performance and less automaticity and steadiness were noted in FGDs. However, dual tasking affected gait performance but, unlike different neurological diseases, not automaticity and steadiness compared to controls. Our findings shed light on higher-level gait control mechanisms in FGDs and suggest stride time variability could be a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.

Improvement in motor symptoms, physical fatigue, and self-rated change perception in functional motor disorders: a prospective cohort study of a 12-week telemedicine program.

BACKGROUND: Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are highly disabling conditions associated with long-term disability, poor quality of life, and economic burden on health and social care. While multidisciplinary 5-days rehabilitation programs have been shown to reduce motor and non-motor symptoms, long-term management and monitoring in FMDs remain an unmet need. AIM: To compare a 12-weeks telemedicine program against a 12-weeks self-management program after a 5-days rehabilitation program for improving motor, non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and perception of change in patients with FMDs. METHODS: The study population was 64 consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of FMDs who underwent a 5-days in-person rehabilitation program followed by either a self-management (the first 32 patients) or a telemedicine program (the latter 32 patients). Validated measures of motor and non-motor symptoms such as fatigue and pain, quality of life, perception of change, gait, and postural control were recorded before (T0), after completion of rehabilitation (T1), and then again at 3 months (T2). RESULTS: Improvement at 3-month follow-up assessment of motor symptoms (p < 0.001), physical fatigue (p = 0.028), and self-rated change perception (p = 0.043) was greater in the telemedicine group. No different between-groups effect was found on other dimensions of fatigue, pain, physical and mental health, and gait and postural control. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term management and expert monitoring of patients with FMDs via telemedicine may enhance long-term outcomes in motor symptoms and physical fatigue, with a positive long-term impact on self-rated health perception of change.