RESUMEN
Although dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been widely used for measuring body composition, discrepancies have been reported to exist among results obtained from different instruments. In the course of longitudinal studies lasting for many years, old instruments may be required to be replaced with new ones, necessitating comparison and validation between the values obtained by the old and new instruments. We compared the data obtained by the two fan-beam DXA instruments, QDR-2000 (Hologic, Waltham, MA) and Delphi (Hologic). Body composition was first measured by the Hologic QDR-2000 and next by the Delphi W within 30 days in 99 healthy subjects. Whole-body fat mass (FM), percentage of FM, arm FM, and leg FM measured by the Hologic QDR-2000 were significantly larger than those measured by the Delphi W. Lean tissue mass (LTM), bone mineral content, and bone mineral density of the whole body, trunk FM, arm LTM, and leg LTM measured by the QDR-2000 were significantly smaller than those measured by the Delphi W. After converting the QDR-2000 values by equations developed by multiple regression analysis, they were not significantly different from the corresponding Delphi values. Measurements by the QDR-2000 and the Delphi W were not interchangeable and the conversion equations reduced the discrepancy to a level that enabled direct comparison of the data obtained by the two instruments. However, cautious interpretation is necessary when the conversion equations are applied to other instruments even of the same type or when evaluating data of individual subjects.