Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in high-risk patients prior to hip fracture.

PURPOSE: Hip fractures in older adults are common and serious events. Patients who sustain fragility hip fractures are defined as having osteoporosis. Patients with dementia or a history of a prior fragility fracture are at increased risk of a future fracture. This study assesses prefracture osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in high-risk groups. METHODS: A case-control analysis of a database of all patients age ≥60 years admitted for surgical repair of nonpathological, low-impact femur fracture between May 2005 and October 2010 was performed. RESULTS: Of 1070 patients, 511 (47.8%) had dementia and 435 (40.7%) had been diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to admission. Patients with dementia were more likely to have a diagnosis of osteoporosis prior to their fracture than those without dementia (43.8% vs 37.7%, P < .05). Twenty-five percent of the total study population had been treated with calcium and vitamin D (Cal+D) prior to admission, and 12% with other osteoporosis medications. There was a trend toward patients with dementia being more likely to have been on Cal+D prior to admission (27.6% vs 22.5%, P = .06), but no difference in treatment with other agents (10.8% vs 13.1%, P = .25). Patients with prior fragility fractures were more likely to be on Cal+D (32.3% vs 25.0%, P < .02); however, there was no difference in the use of other osteoporosis medications (12.3% vs 12%, P = .90). CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of patients that presented with hip fractures were diagnosed with osteoporosis prior to fracture and primary preventative treatment rates were low. Although patients with dementia are more likely to be diagnosed with osteoporosis, they were not more likely to be treated, despite having a greater risk. Additionally, those with prior fragility fractures are often not on preventative treatment. This may represent a missed opportunity for prevention and room for improvement in order to reduce osteoporotic hip fractures.

The impact of comorbidity on perioperative outcomes of hip fractures in a geriatric fracture model.

BACKGROUND: Older adults who sustain hip fractures usually have multiple coexisting medical problems that may impact their treatment and outcomes. The geriatric fracture center (GFC) provides a model of care that standardizes treatment and optimizes outcomes. The purpose of this study is to determine whether GFC patients with a higher burden of comorbidity or specific comorbidities are at risk for worsened perioperative outcomes, such as increased time to surgery (TTS), postoperative complications, and longer length of hospital stay (LOS). METHOD: A total of 1077 patients aged 60 years and older who underwent surgery for a proximal femur fracture between April 15, 2005, and September 30, 2010, were evaluated. Comorbidities measured in the Charlson Comorbidity index were abstracted through chart review. Outcomes were TTS, postoperative complications, and LOS. RESULTS: Most patients were white, with an average age of 85. One half lived in either a nursing home or an assisted living facility. The mean Charlson score was 3.06 and the nursing home residents had a significantly higher score compared to community dwellers (3.4 vs 2.8; P < .0001). Dementia was the most common comorbidity. There was no difference in the LOS or TTS based on Charlson score. The overall complication rate was 44% with delirium being the most common postoperative complication. Peripheral vascular disease, history of solid tumor, and peptic ulcer disease predicted delirium incidence. Charlson score predicted complication risk, with an odds ratio of 1.12 for each point increase. CONCLUSION: Frailty and comorbidity put this hip fracture population at high risk for adverse perioperative outcomes. This study shows that in the GFC model of care the comorbidity burden did not impact the TTS and LOS but did predict postoperative complication rate.

Dementia and hip fractures: development of a pathogenic framework for understanding and studying risk.

Dementia and hip fractures are 2 conditions that are seen primarily in older adults, and both are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. An individual with dementia is up to 3 times more likely than a cognitively intact older adult to sustain a hip fracture. This may occur via several mechanisms, including (1) risk factors that are common to both outcomes; (2) the presence of dementia increasing hip fracture incidence via intermediate risk factors, such as falls, osteoporosis, and vitamin D; and (3) treatment of dementia causing side effects that increase hip fracture risk. We describe a model that applies these 3 mechanisms to explain the relationship between dementia and hip fractures. Comprehensive understanding of these pathways and their relative influence on the outcome of hip fracture will guide the development of effective interventions and potentially improve prevention efforts.

Prevention and clinical management of hip fractures in patients with dementia.

Hip fractures and dementia increase exponentially with age, and patients who are afflicted by both conditions suffer significant morbidity and mortality. The aging of our population heightens the need to recognize the interaction of these conditions in order to improve our efforts to prevent hip fractures, provide acute care that improves outcomes, and provide secondary prevention and rehabilitation that returns patients to their previous level of functioning. Identification and treatment of vitamin D deficiency and osteoporosis and assessment and interventions to reduce falls in patients with dementia can significantly impact the incidence of first and subsequent hip fractures. Acute management of hip fractures that focuses on comanagement by orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians and uses protocol-driven geriatric-focused care has been shown to decrease mortality, length of hospitalization, readmission rates, and complications including delirium. Patients with mild-to-moderate dementia benefit from intensive geriatric rehabilitation to avoid nursing home placement. Recognizing the need to optimize primary and secondary prevention of hip fractures in patients with dementia and educating providers and families will lead to improved quality of life for patients affected by dementia and hip fractures.

HIV infection in men who have sex with men, New York City Department of Health sexually transmitted disease clinics, 1990-1999: a decade of serosurveillance finds that racial disparities and associations between HIV and gonorrhea persist.

BACKGROUND: Previous data indicating wide racial disparities in HIV seroprevalence, associations between sentinel sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and HIV infection, and recent reports of STD outbreaks among men who have sex with men (MSM) have raised concerns that HIV may be resurgent among MSM. GOAL: To measure trends in HIV seroprevalence and describe racial disparities among MSM presenting to New York City Department of Health STD clinics, 1990-1999 (n = 4076). STUDY DESIGN: This blinded HIV-1 serosurvey used remnant serum originally drawn for routine serologic tests for syphilis. Demographic, risk factor, clinical and laboratory data were abstracted from clinic charts of patients whose medical records documented sexual contact with men or with both men and women ("bisexual" men). Data were matched to the specimens, and all personal identifiers were removed before testing. Patients were not interviewed. RESULTS: The sample was 41% black, 20% Hispanic, 31% white, and 9% of other or mixed race/ethnicity. Sixty-one percent of the patients were >30 years of age; 21% were > or = 40 years of age. One-third had sex with women as well as men. For 60%, laboratory-confirmed STD diagnosis was made on the serosurvey visit. Overall, HIV seroprevalence declined from 47% in 1990 to 18% in 1999 (P < 0.01). Seroprevalence declined from 34% to 11% among white men (n = 1250), from 47% to 19% among Hispanic men (n = 795), from 56% to 28% among black men (n = 1656), and from 43% to 14% among men who had sex with both men and women (n = 1447). Seroprevalence among MSM with gonorrhea (n = 507) declined but remained high (57-34%; P < 0.05). In contrast, seroprevalence among MSM with nongonococcal urethritis (n = 953) declined from 36% to 16% (P < 0.01), and seroprevalence among MSM who had no STD (n = 1650) dropped from 48% to 12% (P < 0.01). Gonorrhea was diagnosed almost twice as frequently among seropositive versus seronegative MSM (19% versus 10%; P < 0.05). Black MSM were not more or less likely to have been tested for HIV or to be diagnosed with acute STD than were MSM in the other-race/ethnicity group. Positive serostatus was associated with black race/ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% CI, 2.1-2.9), age >25 years (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.9-3.1), and a diagnosis of gonorrhea (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.0-2.8). Sixty percent of seropositive MSM knew their serostatus from confidential or anonymous HIV testing at this or a previous visit. Two thirds of the known seropositive men had a new STD diagnosed at the serosurvey visit. CONCLUSION: Seroprevalence in this racially diverse sample of MSM declined significantly during the study period. However, wide racial disparities in seroprevalence were observed that were not attributable to disparities in risk factors such as STD, bisexuality, or acceptance of HIV testing. This finding suggests that the observed differences may reflect racial differences in the background seroprevalences, such as those seen in all New York City serosurvey samples and the population-based AIDS case rates. High prevalence associated with gonorrhea and new STD in known seropositive men of any race suggests that continued efforts to control the incidence of STD, increased encouragement of MSM to accept HIV counseling and testing, and prevention-focused counseling of seropositive men are needed.