First experience in ambulatory ultrafiltration therapy for congested heart failure patients in Israel: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing rapidly with high readmission rates, mainly due to fluid retention. Ultrafiltration (UF) is a mechanical method for removing fluids. Since UF was introduced only recently in Israel, the skill and experience required for outpatient congested HF patients is scarce. OBJECTIVEs: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of UF therapy in congested HF patients in outpatient clinics under a strict protocol of monitoring and therapy that we developed. METHODS: Between April and September 2013 we applied UF in our outpatient clinic to seven chronically congested HF patients with NYHA III-IV who did not respond adequately to diuretics. We administered a total of 38 courses. RESULTS: On average, 1982 ml fluid per course was removed without significant adverse events and with patients' subjective feeling of improvement. Only two courses were interrupted prematurely due to mechanical problems but were completed without harm to the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Under appropriate professional medical supervision, UF therapy in an outpatient setting is a safe and effective procedure and serves as an additional tool for managing congested HF patients who do not respond adequately to diuretics.

Risk score model for predicting mortality in advanced heart failure patients followed in a heart failure clinic.

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) in the population is increasing, concomitant with high incidence of rehospitalizations and mortality. The aim of this study was to characterize a prognostic risk score model for patients with chronic HF. A total of 500 patients followed at the HF clinic were evaluated by clinical, functional, laboratory, imaging, and therapeutic variables that were correlated to mortality during a follow-up period of 25 months. Risk stratification was carried out by applying a risk score model based on multivariate analysis. Predictors correlated with mortality during follow-up were systolic blood pressure <110 mm Hg, male sex, age older than 70 years, 6-minute walk distance <300 m, lack of ß-blocker therapy, hyperuricemia (>7.5 mg/dL), hyponatremia, and prolonged QTc interval (>450 ms). Based on these variables, a risk score model (score 0-55) was established and included low risk, score <21 (9% mortality during 2-year follow-up); moderate risk, 21 to 29 (22%); high risk, 30 to 35 (35%), and very high risk: ≥36 points (62% 2-year mortality). The risk model had good discrimination ability (concordance index 0.75), which was better than the performance of the Seattle Heart Failure Model on our cohort (0.69). Simple noninvasive characteristics examined during the initial admission to the HF clinic can serve as prognostic markers for mortality and may help in the process of therapeutic decision-making in patients with HF.

Mortality rates and modes of death in heart failure patients with reduced versus preserved systolic function.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting reports regarding the characteristics and mortality rates of heart failure patients with preserved (HFPSF) vs. reduced systolic left ventricular function (SHF). METHODS: We evaluated the clinical profiles, mortality rates and modes of death in 481 consecutive symptomatic heart failure patients. In 317(66%) patients LVEF was <40% (SHF), and in 164(34%) LVEF≥40% (HFPSF). RESULTS: Compared to the HFPSF group, SHF patients were predominantly younger males with ischemic etiology and less cardiovascular comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation. Over a mean follow-up period of 2 years, 148(31%) patients died. Overall mortality was similar between the two groups: 53(32%) HFPSF patients and 95(30%) SHF patients died (p=0.6), even after adjusting for baseline variables, including age, gender and comorbidities (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.61; p=0.67). In contrast to the similar mortality rates, the modes of death were different. SHF patients had higher death rates due to pump failure compared to the HFPSF group {32/95(34%) vs. 9/53(17%) patients, p=0.03}. A trend towards higher rate of non-cardiac death was observed in HFPSF group {33/53(62%) patients vs. 45/95(47%) patients, respectively, p=0.08}. The prevalence of arrhythmic death was similar in both groups {17/95(18%) vs. 10/53(19%) patients, p=0.9}. CONCLUSIONS: Although the characteristics of HFPSF and SHF patients are distinctively different, the mortality rates are similar. The mode of death is different among the two groups of patients, as pump failure death is significantly higher in SHF patients, while non-cardiac mortality is more prevalent in HFPSF patients.