RESUMEN
A threshold-based classification of cerebral vasospasm needs reference values for intracranial vessel diameters on digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We aimed to generate adjusted reference values for this purpose by retrospectively analyzing angiograms and potential influencing factors on vessel diameters. Angiograms of the anterior circulation were evaluated in 278 patients aged 18−81 years. The vessel diameters of 453 angiograms (175 bilateral) were gathered from nine defined measuring sites. The effect sizes of physical characteristics (i.e., body weight and height, body mass index, gender, age, and cranial side) and anatomical variations were calculated with MANOVA. Segments bearing aneurysms were excluded for the calculation of reference values. Adjusted vessel diameters were calculated via linear regression analysis of the vessel diameter data. Vessel diameters increased with age and body height. Male and right-sided vessels were larger in diameter. Of the anatomical variations, only the hypoplastic/aplastic A1 segment had a significant influence (p < 0.05) on values of the anterior cerebral artery and the internal carotid artery with a small effect size (|ω2| > 0.01) being excluded from the reference values. We provide gender-, age-, and side-adjusted reference values and nomograms of arterial vessel diameters in the anterior circulation.
RESUMEN
Background: Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) continues to account for high morbidity and mortality in patients surviving the initial aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Nimodipine is the only drug known to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), but it is believed not to affect large vessel CVS. Milrinone has emerged as a promising option. Our retrospective study focused on the effectiveness of the intra-arterial application of both drugs in monotherapy and combined therapy. Methods: We searched for patients with aneurysmal SAH, angiographically confirmed CVS, and at least one intra-arterial pharmacological angioplasty. Ten defined vessel sections on angiograms were assessed before and after vasodilator infusion. The improvement in vessel diameters was compared to the frequency of DCI-related cerebral infarction before hospital discharge and functional outcome reported as the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score after 6 months. Results: Between 2014 and 2021, 132 intra-arterial interventions (144 vascular territories, 12 bilaterally) in 30 patients were analyzed for this study. The vasodilating effect of nimodipine was superior to milrinone in all intradural segments. There was no significant intergroup difference concerning outcome in mRS (p = 0.217). Only nimodipine or the combined approach could prevent DCI-related infarction (both 57.1%), not milrinone alone (87.5%). Both drugs induced a doubled vasopressor demand due to blood pressure decrease, but milrinone alone induced tachycardia. Conclusions: The monotherapy with intra-arterial nimodipine was superior to milrinone. Nimodipine and milrinone may be used complementary in an escalation scheme with the administration of nimodipine first, complemented by milrinone in cases of severe CVS. Milrinone monotherapy is not recommended.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the last decade, cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) was a current research focus without a standardized classification in digital subtraction angiography (DSA). This study was performed to investigate a device-independent visual cerebral vasospasm classification for endovascular treatment. METHODS: The analyses are DSA based rather than multimodal. Ten defined points of intracranial arteries were measured in 45 patients suffering from cerebral vasospasm after SAH at three time points (hospitalization, before spasmolysis, control after six months). Mathematical clustering of vessel diameters was performed to generate four objective grades for comparison. Six interventional neuroradiologists in two groups scored 237 DSAs after a new visual classification (grade 0-3) developed on a segmental pattern of vessel contraction. For the second group, a threshold-based criterion was amended. RESULTS: The raters had a reproducibility of 68.4% in the first group and 75.2% in the second group. The complementary threshold-based criterion increased the reproducibility by about 6.8%, while the rating deviated more from the mathematical clustering in all grades. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed visual classification scheme of cerebral vasospasm is suitable as a standard grading procedure for endovascular treatment. There is no advantage of a threshold-based criterion that compensates for the effort involved. Automated vessel analysis is superior to compare inter-group results in research settings.
