RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.
Asunto(s)
Percepción Auditiva , Lenguaje Infantil , Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/efectos adversos , Comunicación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/etiología , Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Personas con Discapacidad Auditiva/métodos , Educación de Personas con Discapacidad Auditiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Integración Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas , Inteligibilidad del Habla , Logopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Cochlear and brainstem implants have been included on the list of reimbursable products (LPPR) in France since March of 2009. The implants were initially inscribed for 5 years, after which an application for renewal with the French National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies (Commission Nationale d'évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologies de santé - CNEDiMTS) was required [Haute Autorité de santé, 2009]. Upon registration to the list of reimbursable products, the companies and the reference centers for cochlear and brainstem implants were asked to set up a post-registration registry called EPIIC. This article reports the evolution in the EPIIC registry of the general indicators for 5051 patients over the five years from 2012-2016.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Comités Consultivos/organización & administración , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantes Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico/economía , Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/economía , Seguridad Computacional , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Aprobación de Recursos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia , Guías como Asunto/normas , Sector de Atención de Salud/economía , Sector de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud , Control de Calidad , Estándares de Referencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Implantes Cocleares/efectos adversos , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Falla de Prótesis , Reimplantación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative complications related to cochlear implantations. We searched for risk factors predicting these complications and analyzed the complications in the youngest and most elderly. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent cochlear implantation in France between January 2012 and December 2016 were anonymized and registered in the EPIIC database. This population included 3483 adults and 2245 children. Their demographic and surgical data and their incidence of peri- or post-operative complications, including their severity, whether major or minor, were all indicated. RESULTS: The global complication rate was 6.84%. The risk of complication was higher in initial implantation versus reimplantation (P<0.0001). The risk was also higher for bilateral implantation versus unilateral (P<0.0001). Complications were more frequent for patients with cochlear malformation (P=0.002). There was no difference in complication rates across age groups; babies under 1 year old, and the elderly over 80 and even over 90, did not have more complications than the rest of the population. Patients treated in the daily care unit had no more complications than those who were hospitalized for one night or more (P=0.64). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a safe technique with a low incidence of complications. The absence of increased risk in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum justifies offering this solution to all, without age limitation.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Cóclea/anomalías , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Centros de Día/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
This study concerns the results of cochlear implantation in children and adults from French cochlear implantation centers, monitored at one, two and three years by the Cochlear Implant French Registry EPIIC. This multicenter study enrolled 2603 subjects (1667 adults and 936 children) implanted in one ear. The following parameters were studied: hearing overall performances, monosyllabic or dissyllabic word perception, speech intelligibility, self-assessment questionnaire of Cochlear Implant (CI) benefits (Abbreviated profile of Hearing aid Benefit); professional activity and schooling. This study confirms the ceiling effect in adults' performances after the 1st year and the progressive growth in children's performances. It also shows that the contralateral hearing aid enhances performances compared to the CI alone condition, in all follow-up sessions. The French register of CIs is the only worldwide register of systematic follow-up on a period of three years and more of all adults and children implanted in a country.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Percepción Auditiva , Niño , Preescolar , Educación , Empleo , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Inteligibilidad del Habla , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. RESULTS: The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Percepción Auditiva , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Comunicación , Femenino , Francia , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Pruebas Auditivas/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Auditiva en el Tronco Encefálico/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Selección de Paciente , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría del Habla/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Implantes Cocleares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the incidence and results of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults and children in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of data in the French national registry of cochlear implantations from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2016. Functional results from CAP (Category of Auditory Performance) questionnaires and speech audiometry tests, with mono- and di-syllabic word-lists, were compared before and after implantation. Speech audiometry tests were carried out against a noisy background, except before simultaneous implantations. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty two bilateral cochlear implantations were performed during this period, that is, 16.4% of all cochlear implantations. Five hundred and eighty eight bilateral implantations were performed sequentially. 59% of the bilateral implantations were performed in children. Bilateral implants significantly improved CAP scores in all cases (P<0.001). Auditory performance, with the two types of word-list, were significantly improved after simultaneous implantation (P<0.01). After sequential implantation, the speech discrimination score, already very good with the first implant, reached 63±26% [0-100] with monosyllabic word lists, and 72±28% [0-100] with dissyllabic words. There were more complications due to surgery in bilateral cases than in the entire population of cochlear recipients (9.1% vs 6.4%, P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Hearing is significantly improved by simultaneous cochlear implantation. For sequential implantation, at one year, when auditory results were already excellent from the first implant, in the bimodal condition CAP scores were significantly improved, although there was no further change in speech audiometry in noise.
Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/métodos , Implantes Cocleares/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Audiometría del Habla/métodos , Percepción Auditiva , Niño , Implantación Coclear/efectos adversos , Implantación Coclear/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/etiología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas de Discriminación del Habla/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The role of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in the management of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is not precisely defined in children. The primary objective of this study was to describe DISE-induced revision of airway obstruction site location and the ensuing treatment changes in children with OSAHS. Secondary objectives were to analyze the correlation of number of obstruction sites found on DISE with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and with type of OSAHS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center study included 31 children (mean age: 5.5±2.6years) undergoing DISE for management of OSAHS between 2015 and 2018. Revisions of airway obstruction site location and in treatment were noted. The correlation of number of obstruction sites with AHI and with type of OSAHS was analyzed. RESULTS: Airway obstruction site location was reconsidered in 77% of children (n=24), modifying treatment in 45.2% (n=14). There was no significant correlation between number of obstruction sites and AHI: Spearman coefficient 0.20 (P=0.26). Patients with type-III OSAHS did not show more obstruction sites than others: respectively, 2.0 versus 1.8 (P=0.40). CONCLUSION: DISE induced significant revision of the location and change in treatment of obstruction sites in children with OSAHS. Systematic implementation, especially in type-I OSAHS, would allow more precise pre-therapeutic classification and treatment adapted to actual airway obstruction.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Endoscopía/métodos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Polisomnografía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Using respiratory polygraphy (RP) in children for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) can be challenging in terms of device acceptance and sensor displacement. Automatic analysis of respiratory events has never been evaluated in a pediatric population. The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of pediatric RP in routine ENT department practice. The secondary objective was to evaluate the reliability of the automatic detection of obstructive and central respiratory events in children. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included 50 children (32 boys, 18 girls; mean age 5.5±2.3years) undergoing overnight RP in an ENT department between January and August 2016 for suspected OSAHS. Manual detection of respiratory events was performed by one ENT specialist experienced in RP interpretation, and compared to automatic analysis. RESULTS: The device was well accepted in 98% of cases. Overall signal quality was>50% in 76% of cases, with average signal quality of 70.8% (86% in patients>3 yrs, 25% in patients<3 yrs, P=0.0013). There was no significant correlation between manual and automatic analyses, except for central apnea (Spearman coefficient 0.43; P=0.0015). One hundred percent of patients presented OSAHS according to automatic detection, compared to 32% according to manual detection (P<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric RP is feasible in routine practice in an ENT department, with good acceptance and satisfactory signal quality in children older than 3years. Automatic analysis of respiratory events in children is unreliable, except for central apnea.
Asunto(s)
Polisomnografía , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The WHO stated a short time ago that the total eradication of smallpox would occur shortly. This announcement has been contradicted by an epidemic of smallpox in Somaila which in spite of the energetic measures taken, remained in the capital from August 1976 to January 1977 then extended to 10 regions out of 16 with from January 1977 to 18 June 1977, 1 567 cases of smallpox. This is only a provisional estimation as it is increasing every week. In view of the ease and rapidity of airline communication, it is very possible that infected subjects or products arrive in France, it is necessary for doctors to be warned and counteract the present tendancy to neglect the legal requirement for smallpox vaccination.